How to get rid of malware (from Microsoft 'Answers'

[G. Morgan]

~BD~ wrote:

>G. Morgan wrote:
>> Dustin wrote:
>>
>>> Honestly, I think if he loads firebug (which is damn ****ing cool!)
>>> he'll have a lot more questions which he won't understand the answers
>>> too. I'm not trying to insult anybody, just sayin...
>>
>>
>> It is. I discovered it about 6 months ago, it provides amazing insight
>> on page objects.
>>
>
>Have you used it to look at www.Annexcafe.com ?

Lol... What do you think?

I told you, I'm not getting involved in the Annex/Aumha thing!

That is why your email went unanswered BTW. I asked you before not to
bother me with anything regarding that.

[~BD~]

G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Honestly, I think if he loads firebug (which is damn ****ing cool!)
>>>> he'll have a lot more questions which he won't understand the answers
>>>> too. I'm not trying to insult anybody, just sayin...
>>>
>>>
>>> It is. I discovered it about 6 months ago, it provides amazing insight
>>> on page objects.
>>>
>>
>> Have you used it to look at www.Annexcafe.com ?
>
> Lol... What do you think?

I think not - just in case you discover something untoward!

Now that *would* be embarrassing! ;-)

> I told you, I'm not getting involved in the Annex/Aumha thing!
>
> That is why your email went unanswered BTW. I asked you before not to
> bother me with anything regarding that.

I didn't mean to be a 'bother'.

I'm glad your dad is better anyway.

It would have been nice if you'd replied and said something like (as I
requested) 'got your message, but will not be responding in detail'.
Just good manners, Graham.

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:18:20 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> It would have been nice if you'd replied and said something like (as I
> requested) 'got your message, but will not be responding in detail'.
> Just good manners, Graham.

It would be good manners on your part to stop bugging people with your
****ing paranoia, ****, as well as refraining from slimy innuendo,
implication and insinuation.



--
"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask
why are they poor, they call me a Communist."
- Hélder Pessoa Câmara, Archbishop of Olinda and Recife, Brazil

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:18:20 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> It would have been nice if you'd replied and said something like (as I
>> requested) 'got your message, but will not be responding in detail'.
>> Just good manners, Graham.
>
> It would be good manners on your part to stop bugging people with your
> paranoia, as well as refraining from slimy innuendo, implication and insinuation.
>
>
>

If you don't like it here on *my* group, you are free to leave at at any
time.

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:Rp-dnTwinItoCs_TnZ2dnUVZ8lydnZ2d@bt.com...

> If you don't like it here on *my* group, you are free to leave at at any time.


I told you before BD that there is a group set up just for you and your types. It is
alt.dumb****s.troll-inc and you can access it on the
nntp.aioe.org server. Now you can freely call that your own group. Otherwise GAFO


BTW: Your grasp of the English language needs to be upgraded (at at )

Jack

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:55:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:18:20 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> It would have been nice if you'd replied and said something like (as I
>>> requested) 'got your message, but will not be responding in detail'.
>>> Just good manners, Graham.
>>
>> It would be good manners on your part to stop bugging people with your
>> paranoia, as well as refraining from slimy innuendo, implication and
>> insinuation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> If you don't like it here on *my* group, you are free to leave at at any
> time.

It's *nobody's* group, ****. Anyone may post anything any time they want
to. As long as it concerns the privacy implications of spyware.

Now **** off, ****.



--
"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask
why are they poor, they call me a Communist."
- Hélder Pessoa Câmara, Archbishop of Olinda and Recife, Brazil

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:55:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:18:20 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> It would have been nice if you'd replied and said something like (as I
>>>> requested) 'got your message, but will not be responding in detail'.
>>>> Just good manners, Graham.
>>>
>>> It would be good manners on your part to stop bugging people with your
>>> paranoia, as well as refraining from slimy innuendo, implication and
>>> insinuation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> If you don't like it here on *my* group, you are free to leave at at any
>> time.
>
> It's *nobody's* group, ****. Anyone may post anything any time they want
> to. As long as it concerns the privacy implications of spyware.
>
> Now **** off, ****.
>
>
>

You are a bit of a fly boy, aren't you?!!!

http://www.annexcafe.com/gallery/mem...8-lkb_zoom.jpg

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

~BD~ wrote:

> If you don't like it here on *my* group, you are free to leave at at
> any time.

You are not posting in that scorched group, asswipe.

--
-bts
-May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your narrowboat

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know>

> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:18:20 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> It would have been nice if you'd replied and said something like (as I
>> requested) 'got your message, but will not be responding in detail'.
>> Just good manners, Graham.
>
> It would be good manners on your part to stop bugging people with your
> ****ing paranoia, ****, as well as refraining from slimy innuendo,
> implication and insinuation.
>
Typical Passive Aggressive behaviour.



--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[FromTheRafters]

"Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9F4912123082HHI2948AJD832@no...
> "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:j2kk41$j5u$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9F45AC1D6E272HHI2948AJD832@no...
>>> "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:j2j8vv$l6u$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>>>> newst93q.107367$wK7.16036@newsfe13.ams2...
>>>>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:47:48 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's funny, FTR?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why post a link which doesn't 'work'?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because it is so simple, yet you won't figure it out without
>>>>>> help - and those that could help, won't.
>>>>>
>>>>> BD is certainly a source of great amusement.
>>>>
>>>> He seems to be claiming that "Vinny" wrote that MBAM
>>>> was written by an MS MVP. Such a shame that he can't
>>>> cite a webpage to back that assertion up.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, Marcin wasn't an MVP at the time he created MBAM. Bruce may
>>> be an MVP, but isn't on the development staff. He's the project
>>> manager. The second in command as it were.
>>
>> I figured as much. I was trying to set up BD for a little
>> lighthearted fun is all.
>
> Hey, on a good note; you did get the page information corrected in a
> round about way. [g]

Indeed ... magical! )