We read you here and on the other groups.
You fit the mold.
"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:j2b4ql$cfn$1@dont-email.me...
Bullwinkle. wrote:
> So, you pulled a boaterdave over nothing. Nice going.
So, once again you prove that you do not logically comprehend what you read.
Buffalo
Buffalo wrote:
> Well, according to Avira AntiVir it is TR/SpySpatet.BC.
> Yes, I did submit that file to Avira as a suspected False Positive.
> Definition: V7.11.13.37 8/12/2011
> Buffalo
Comodo also finds it to be possible Malware. Heuristic Suspicious.
"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:j247qe$pff$1@dont-email.me...
> Well, according to Avira AntiVir it is TR/SpySpatet.BC.
> Yes, I did submit that file to Avira as a suspected False Positive.
> Definition: V7.11.13.37 8/12/2011
I would be suspicious of it just because the name is *so* close to
SUPERAntiSpyware.exe ;o)
FromTheRafters wrote:
> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:j247qe$pff$1@dont-email.me...
>> Well, according to Avira AntiVir it is TR/SpySpatet.BC.
>> Yes, I did submit that file to Avira as a suspected False Positive.
>> Definition: V7.11.13.37 8/12/2011
>
> I would be suspicious of it just because the name is *so* close to
> SUPERAntiSpyware.exe ;o)
Damm, I'm sorry about the mispelling of SuperAntiSpyware and that was a good
catch.
It was just a typing mistake on my part. When I submitted that file to Virus
Total, Avira hit on it and so did Comodo, no others did.
"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:j24fjc$coo$1@dont-email.me...
>
>
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:j247qe$pff$1@dont-email.me...
>>> Well, according to Avira AntiVir it is TR/SpySpatet.BC.
>>> Yes, I did submit that file to Avira as a suspected False Positive.
>>> Definition: V7.11.13.37 8/12/2011
>>
>> I would be suspicious of it just because the name is *so* close to
>> SUPERAntiSpyware.exe ;o)
>
> Damm, I'm sorry about the mispelling of SuperAntiSpyware and that was a good
> catch.
> It was just a typing mistake on my part. When I submitted that file to Virus
> Total, Avira hit on it and so did Comodo, no others did.
It's probably a false positive if you got the official exe, is the file checksum
good?
"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in news:j247qe$pff$1@dont-email.me:
> Well, according to Avira AntiVir it is TR/SpySpatet.BC.
> Yes, I did submit that file to Avira as a suspected False Positive.
> Definition: V7.11.13.37 8/12/2011
> Buffalo
My wife has the same problem. I just made sure everything is updated and
both Avira paid and SAS free are up to date. Problem persists, so I had to
exit SAS to let her do her work.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Han wrote:
> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in
> news:j247qe$pff$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Well, according to Avira AntiVir it is TR/SpySpatet.BC.
>> Yes, I did submit that file to Avira as a suspected False Positive.
>> Definition: V7.11.13.37 8/12/2011
>> Buffalo
>
> My wife has the same problem. I just made sure everything is updated
> and both Avira paid and SAS free are up to date. Problem persists,
> so I had to exit SAS to let her do her work.
I have just the opposite. Paid SAS and Free Avira. Still no word back from
Avira except that they are looking at it.
I believe it is because of the latest update of SAS that was put out which I
believe may have been to correct a problem with the new SAS and Win2kProSP4.
Buffalo
From: "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid>
>
> Han wrote:
>> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in
>> news:j247qe$pff$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Well, according to Avira AntiVir it is TR/SpySpatet.BC.
>>> Yes, I did submit that file to Avira as a suspected False Positive.
>>> Definition: V7.11.13.37 8/12/2011
>>> Buffalo
>>
>> My wife has the same problem. I just made sure everything is updated
>> and both Avira paid and SAS free are up to date. Problem persists,
>> so I had to exit SAS to let her do her work.
>
> I have just the opposite. Paid SAS and Free Avira. Still no word back from
> Avira except that they are looking at it.
> I believe it is because of the latest update of SAS that was put out which I
> believe may have been to correct a problem with the new SAS and Win2kProSP4.
> Buffalo
>
Provide me the file that is being flagged and I'll escalate the resolution.
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid>
>
>>
>> Han wrote:
>>> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:j247qe$pff$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> Well, according to Avira AntiVir it is TR/SpySpatet.BC.
>>>> Yes, I did submit that file to Avira as a suspected False Positive.
>>>> Definition: V7.11.13.37 8/12/2011
>>>> Buffalo
>>>
>>> My wife has the same problem. I just made sure everything is
>>> updated and both Avira paid and SAS free are up to date. Problem
>>> persists, so I had to exit SAS to let her do her work.
>>
>> I have just the opposite. Paid SAS and Free Avira. Still no word
>> back from Avira except that they are looking at it.
>> I believe it is because of the latest update of SAS that was put out
>> which I believe may have been to correct a problem with the new SAS
>> and Win2kProSP4. Buffalo
>>
>
>
> Provide me the file that is being flagged and I'll escalate the
> resolution.
It is the superantispyware.exe file that is being flagged, I don't know
which part of it.
Can you tell me how to find out?
I don't believe you want the whole 4.3MB file.
If so, tell me how to send it to you.
Buffalo
From: "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid>
>
> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid>
>>
>>> Han wrote:
>>>> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in
>>>> news:j247qe$pff$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, according to Avira AntiVir it is TR/SpySpatet.BC.
>>>>> Yes, I did submit that file to Avira as a suspected False Positive.
>>>>> Definition: V7.11.13.37 8/12/2011
>>>>> Buffalo
>>>>
>>>> My wife has the same problem. I just made sure everything is
>>>> updated and both Avira paid and SAS free are up to date. Problem
>>>> persists, so I had to exit SAS to let her do her work.
>>>
>>> I have just the opposite. Paid SAS and Free Avira. Still no word
>>> back from Avira except that they are looking at it.
>>> I believe it is because of the latest update of SAS that was put out
>>> which I believe may have been to correct a problem with the new SAS
>>> and Win2kProSP4. Buffalo
>>>
>> Provide me the file that is being flagged and I'll escalate the
>> resolution.
> It is the superantispyware.exe file that is being flagged, I don't know
> which part of it.
> Can you tell me how to find out?
> I don't believe you want the whole 4.3MB file.
> If so, tell me how to send it to you.
Yes, of course I'd want the whole file(s). Whatever file(s) Avira is flagging on SAS.
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote