Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Re: PCButts Infamous Pic of Dust**** Relaxing After Virus Writing

  1. #11
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Missing post?

    Aardvark wrote:
    > On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:20:09 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
    >
    >> Aardvark wrote:
    >>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:18:10 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Aardvark wrote:
    >>>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:35:28 -0700, BoaterDave wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> I agree with this well written post! :-)
    >>>>>
    >>>>> There's *no* post here, well-written or otherwise.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>> <SNIP UNREAD>
    >>>
    >>> There's *no* post here, well-written or otherwise.

    >>
    >> Why not?<shrug>

    >
    > Bit-bucket.
    >
    >
    >


    Then you've missed a treat! :-)

    Here it is again.

    He says .........

    (As usual, when replying to one of "those kind" on Usenet, it is
    necessary to cut their overly long character per line count to what
    is standard for the vast majority of users. It seems these infantile
    tantrum throwers like Foldes and Raid cannot abide by the simplest of
    decorums - 72 characters or less per a line. They are sufferers with
    pathetically sensitive egos which cannot tolerate the dicipline of
    the simplest forms in life.)

    What I know about PCButts is that "supposedly" he claimed to be an
    MSMVP. I don't know nor care if that is the truth. If I cut everyone
    out of my life who made a mistake due to ego, I'd be totally
    friendless.

    All I know is that HOST files supposedly were made to protect users
    from malware entering their systems, not to even scores with those
    the-powers-that-be disagree with. The claims against PCButts belong in
    the legal system, not in a HOST file.

    The average user hasn't a clue about what Code is or isn't in PCButts
    software. They are incapable of judgement on the subject. Those whose
    code has "supposedly' been stolen, evidently - since PCButts' site is
    still extant, have not taken the proper legal steps to avail
    themselves of any remedy there might be. I can only assume, therefore,
    that PCButts is innocent of all charges.

    > By posting what you did...you are in agreement with PCButts....You

    are also a thieving idiot."

    And you are Peter Foldes - and all of the sane on Usenet know what
    that connotes

    I advise no one to download PCButt's programs from his site. But in
    good concience, I must tell them that the site is free of malware, and
    they should do a FIND with their text program and remove all mentions
    of PCButts from their HOST files.


  2. #12
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: Missing post?

    On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:39:22 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

    > Aardvark wrote:
    >> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:20:09 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
    >>
    >>> Aardvark wrote:
    >>>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:18:10 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Aardvark wrote:
    >>>>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:35:28 -0700, BoaterDave wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> I agree with this well written post! :-)
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> There's *no* post here, well-written or otherwise.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>> <SNIP UNREAD>
    >>>>
    >>>> There's *no* post here, well-written or otherwise.
    >>>
    >>> Why not?<shrug>

    >>
    >> Bit-bucket.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    > Then you've missed a treat! :-)
    >
    > Here it is again.
    >
    > He says .........
    >
    > <SNIPPED UNREAD>


    I have a bit-bucket for a reason, ****.



    --
    "Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
    lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
    sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
    practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

  3. #13
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: PCButts Infamous Pic of Dust**** Relaxing After Virus Writing

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    news:96ednfX6c9G_XK_TnZ2dnUVZ8gKdnZ2d@bt.com...
    > Aardvark wrote:
    >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:35:28 -0700, BoaterDave wrote:
    >>
    >>> I agree with this well written post! :-)

    >>
    >> There's *no* post here, well-written or otherwise.
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Message-ID: <PYTVU51O40751.2386574074@reece.net.au>


    Who wrote that error filled post?



  4. #14
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: PCButts Infamous Pic of Dust**** Relaxing After Virus Writing

    FromTheRafters wrote:
    > "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    > news:96ednfX6c9G_XK_TnZ2dnUVZ8gKdnZ2d@bt.com...
    >> Aardvark wrote:
    >>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:35:28 -0700, BoaterDave wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> I agree with this well written post! :-)
    >>>
    >>> There's *no* post here, well-written or otherwise.
    >>>
    >>>

    >>
    >> Message-ID:<PYTVU51O40751.2386574074@reece.net.au>

    >
    > Who wrote that error filled post?
    >
    >


    Charlie?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OBlgSz8sSM

    :-)

  5. #15
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: PCButts Infamous Pic of Dust**** Relaxing After Virus Writing

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    news:6fydncQOobdUuq7TnZ2dnUVZ7sSdnZ2d@bt.com...
    > FromTheRafters wrote:
    >> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    >> news:96ednfX6c9G_XK_TnZ2dnUVZ8gKdnZ2d@bt.com...
    >>> Aardvark wrote:
    >>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:35:28 -0700, BoaterDave wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> I agree with this well written post! :-)
    >>>>
    >>>> There's *no* post here, well-written or otherwise.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> Message-ID:<PYTVU51O40751.2386574074@reece.net.au>

    >>
    >> Who wrote that error filled post?
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Charlie?


    Maybe you could ask him where he got the hairbrained
    idea that the hosts file was made to have anything to do
    with its current implementation as a filter.

    How is PCButts' webpage a "supposed" claim to being
    a Microsoft MVP?

    It doesn't suprise me much that you expressed your agreement
    with that post, but it being so full of crap I would think that you
    would rather distance yourself from it.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •