PCButts Infamous Pic of Dust**** Relaxing After Virus Writing

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:req637d6mugpf7a2f5t8425qjs2864eokv@Osama-is-dead.net:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>
>>Seems to me, he has *much* to learn. Shame too, could have taught
>>him many things.
>
> Look man. YOU made a deal that you wouldn't reply or talk about me.
> You are breaking your word. The proposal was your's to begin with,
> can't you keep your word??

I can. I can also treat others exactly as they treat me. I read your
posts Morgan. You didn't mention me by name, you skirted around it.
Cheeky references to Harry Potter didn't go unnoticed.

For some reason, and I don't really know why, anymore, you just piss me
right off. Perhaps it's the two faced nature you have which annoys me, or
maybe it's just because I plain don't ****ing like you. I'm having a hard
time deciding which.




--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:qcq637593u2jb43uil6j7em1tgqmg7drt3@Osama-is-dead.net:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>Don't bother David. We have Morgan to thank for the remailers
>>ability to quickly spam now-evidently the remailer was doing it by
>>hand previously. He was kind enough to provide them detailed
>>instructions on a specific application.
>
> Cite...

I said that once before, in alt.politics.scorched-earth.
You didn't disagree then, in fact, you laughed about it and encouraged
more.

> That's bull****.

See above. Or, were you bull****ting the first time?


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[Bullwinkle.]

Maybe because he is bd's newest stooge?


"Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9F3494C295E5CHHI2948AJD832@no...
G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:req637d6mugpf7a2f5t8425qjs2864eokv@Osama-is-dead.net:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>
>>Seems to me, he has *much* to learn. Shame too, could have taught
>>him many things.
>
> Look man. YOU made a deal that you wouldn't reply or talk about me.
> You are breaking your word. The proposal was your's to begin with,
> can't you keep your word??

I can. I can also treat others exactly as they treat me. I read your
posts Morgan. You didn't mention me by name, you skirted around it.
Cheeky references to Harry Potter didn't go unnoticed.

For some reason, and I don't really know why, anymore, you just piss me
right off. Perhaps it's the two faced nature you have which annoys me, or
maybe it's just because I plain don't ****ing like you. I'm having a hard
time deciding which.




--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[G. Morgan]

Dustin wrote:

>G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
>news:qcq637593u2jb43uil6j7em1tgqmg7drt3@Osama-is-dead.net:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>
>>>Don't bother David. We have Morgan to thank for the remailers
>>>ability to quickly spam now-evidently the remailer was doing it by
>>>hand previously. He was kind enough to provide them detailed
>>>instructions on a specific application.
>>
>> Cite...
>
>I said that once before, in alt.politics.scorched-earth.
>You didn't disagree then, in fact, you laughed about it and encouraged
>more.

I laughed because you thought I had anything to do with helping the
Remailer. You said yourself he's been doing it for years.

>> That's bull****.
>
>See above. Or, were you bull****ting the first time?

I was just laughing the first time, I didn't confirm nor deny your
accusation.

[G. Morgan]

Dustin wrote:

>G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
>news:req637d6mugpf7a2f5t8425qjs2864eokv@Osama-is-dead.net:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Seems to me, he has *much* to learn. Shame too, could have taught
>>>him many things.
>>
>> Look man. YOU made a deal that you wouldn't reply or talk about me.
>> You are breaking your word. The proposal was your's to begin with,
>> can't you keep your word??
>
>I can. I can also treat others exactly as they treat me. I read your
>posts Morgan. You didn't mention me by name, you skirted around it.
>Cheeky references to Harry Potter didn't go unnoticed.
>
>For some reason, and I don't really know why, anymore, you just piss me
>right off. Perhaps it's the two faced nature you have which annoys me, or
>maybe it's just because I plain don't ****ing like you. I'm having a hard
>time deciding which.

Well, while you're deciding I guess it's time to renew to deal or cancel
it. Your choice.

[FromTheRafters]

"Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9F3492CC0679AHHI2948AJD832@no...
> "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in news:j0vo66$mt0$1
> @dont-email.me:
>
>> "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9F31D2724E994HHI2948AJD832@no...
>>> G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
>>> news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:
>>>
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.
>>>>
>>>> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.
>>>
>>> Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...
>>
>> Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
>> instead of a name to look up? )
>
> Nope. URL is a name, IP is an.. You guessed it, IP! URL requires DNS
> help, actual IP doesn't.

This time, I'll have to agree with Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Locator
"Every URL consists of some of the following: the scheme name (commonly called
protocol), followed by a colon, then, depending on scheme, a domain name
(alternatively, IP address), a port number, the path of the resource to be
fetched or the program to be run, then, for programs such as Common Gateway
Interface (CGI) scripts, a query string,[8][9] and an optional fragment
identifier.[10]

The syntax is
scheme://domainort/path?query_string#fragment_id"

They are in total agreement with what I had already understood to be the case,
so I like their answer better than yours. It is *still* a URL whether a domain
name (or other name) to IP address lookup is needed or not.

[David H. Lipman]

From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com>

>>>
>>> Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
>>> instead of a name to look up? )
>>
>> Nope. URL is a name, IP is an.. You guessed it, IP! URL requires DNS
>> help, actual IP doesn't.
>
> This time, I'll have to agree with Wikipedia:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Locator
> "Every URL consists of some of the following: the scheme name (commonly called
> protocol), followed by a colon, then, depending on scheme, a domain name (alternatively,
> IP address), a port number, the path of the resource to be fetched or the program to be
> run, then, for programs such as Common Gateway Interface (CGI) scripts, a query
> string,[8][9] and an optional fragment identifier.[10]
>
> The syntax is
> scheme://domainort/path?query_string#fragment_id"
>
> They are in total agreement with what I had already understood to be the case, so I like
> their answer better than yours. It is *still* a URL whether a domain name (or other
> name) to IP address lookup is needed or not.
>


When does a URL become an IRL ?

Local protocols like hcp ?
Ex: hcp://system/HomePage.htm

BTW: That syntax is incomplete:
scheme://userassword@hostort/path

PS: Remember to remove; alt.politics.scorched-earth

--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Dustin]

"FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in
news:j17351$f14$1@dont-email.me:

> "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9F3492CC0679AHHI2948AJD832@no...
>> "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:j0vo66$mt0$1 @dont-email.me:
>>
>>> "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns9F31D2724E994HHI2948AJD832@no...
>>>> G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
>>>> news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:
>>>>
>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.
>>>>
>>>> Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...
>>>
>>> Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
>>> instead of a name to look up? )
>>
>> Nope. URL is a name, IP is an.. You guessed it, IP! URL requires
>> DNS help, actual IP doesn't.
>
> This time, I'll have to agree with Wikipedia:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Locator
> "Every URL consists of some of the following: the scheme name
> (commonly called protocol), followed by a colon, then, depending on
> scheme, a domain name (alternatively, IP address), a port number,
> the path of the resource to be fetched or the program to be run,
> then, for programs such as Common Gateway Interface (CGI) scripts, a
> query string,[8][9] and an optional fragment identifier.[10]
>
> The syntax is
> scheme://domainort/path?query_string#fragment_id"
>
> They are in total agreement with what I had already understood to be
> the case, so I like their answer better than yours. It is *still* a
> URL whether a domain name (or other name) to IP address lookup is
> needed or not.

If your using the IP address, a domain name lookup (resolve URL to IP)
seems a bit redundant.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:kbtd37l8ubl681oaakjeqk0s6agighklua@Osama-is-dead.net:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
>>news:req637d6mugpf7a2f5t8425qjs2864eokv@Osama-is-dead.net:
>>
>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Seems to me, he has *much* to learn. Shame too, could have taught
>>>>him many things.
>>>
>>> Look man. YOU made a deal that you wouldn't reply or talk about
>>> me. You are breaking your word. The proposal was your's to begin
>>> with, can't you keep your word??
>>
>>I can. I can also treat others exactly as they treat me. I read
>>your posts Morgan. You didn't mention me by name, you skirted around
>>it. Cheeky references to Harry Potter didn't go unnoticed.
>>
>>For some reason, and I don't really know why, anymore, you just piss
>>me right off. Perhaps it's the two faced nature you have which
>>annoys me, or maybe it's just because I plain don't ****ing like
>>you. I'm having a hard time deciding which.
>
> Well, while you're deciding I guess it's time to renew to deal or
> cancel it. Your choice.

And you'll do what exactly? From where I sit, you don't have anything I
want so aren't really in much of a position to bargain with me. In
fairness, I have nothing you want either; so we're on even ground here.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:h5td371jhmcvuarnpmdgfifsavveqdm9hl@Osama-is-dead.net:

> I laughed because you thought I had anything to do with helping the
> Remailer. You said yourself he's been doing it for years.

You find the actions of the remailer amusing, do you? If you had any
questions of me, you could ask me. If you really think the information
provided by the remailer is in any possible way an accurate dipiction of
me, I have serious doubts as to your mental abilities in general. It's
either that, OR, you're pitifully unaware of the underground scene and
what it could mean at that time for my real identity to become known.
Speculations aside.

>>See above. Or, were you bull****ting the first time?
>
> I was just laughing the first time, I didn't confirm nor deny your
> accusation.

In that case, I am sorry for having wrongly accused you and for
misunderstanding what you wrote.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.