Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 172

Thread: PCButts Infamous Pic of Dust**** Relaxing After Virus Writing

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Dustin Guest

    Re: The Host's file

    G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
    news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:

    > ~BD~ wrote:
    >
    >>To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.

    >
    > Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.


    Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...


    --
    I am a sinner
    Hold my prayers upto the sun
    I am a sinner
    Heaven's closed for what I've done.

  2. #2
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: The Host's file

    From: "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com>

    > G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
    > news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:
    >
    >> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>
    >>> To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.

    >>
    >> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.

    >
    > Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...


    If its a dedicated site, yes.



    --
    Dave
    Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
    http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  3. #3
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: The Host's file

    "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:Xns9F31D2724E994HHI2948AJD832@no...
    > G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
    > news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:
    >
    >> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>
    >>>To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.

    >>
    >> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.

    >
    > Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...


    Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
    instead of a name to look up? )

    Anyway, the server gets to decide what to do with your request.



  4. #4
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: The Host's file

    FromTheRafters wrote:
    > "Dustin"<bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:Xns9F31D2724E994HHI2948AJD832@no...
    >> G. Morgan<G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
    >> news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:
    >>
    >>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.
    >>>
    >>> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.

    >>
    >> Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...

    >
    > Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
    > instead of a name to look up? )


    Not according to this item!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform...rce_Identifier

    I learn a lot from being here on SE!

    > Anyway, the server gets to decide what to do with your request.


    I know that - now! ;-)

    Remember our discussion about being 'vulnerable' simply by connecting to
    news.annexcafe.com ? .... or news.dogagent.com ?!!


  5. #5
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: The Host's file


    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    news:Ys2dnaLXj4sYJa7TnZ2dnUVZ7tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
    > FromTheRafters wrote:
    >> "Dustin"<bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >> news:Xns9F31D2724E994HHI2948AJD832@no...
    >>> G. Morgan<G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
    >>> news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:
    >>>
    >>>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.
    >>>>
    >>>> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.
    >>>
    >>> Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...

    >>
    >> Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
    >> instead of a name to look up? )

    >
    > Not according to this item!
    >
    > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform...rce_Identifier


    What part of that item says that a numerical address disqualifies the string as
    being a URL?

    > I learn a lot from being here on SE!


    Here's your chance to teach *me* something.

    Why isn't http://88.198.244.100/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier a URL?

    [...]



  6. #6
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: The Host's file

    FromTheRafters wrote:
    > "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    > news:Ys2dnaLXj4sYJa7TnZ2dnUVZ7tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
    >> FromTheRafters wrote:
    >>> "Dustin"<bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >>> news:Xns9F31D2724E994HHI2948AJD832@no...
    >>>> G. Morgan<G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
    >>>> news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:
    >>>>
    >>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.
    >>>>
    >>>> Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...
    >>>
    >>> Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
    >>> instead of a name to look up? )

    >>
    >> Not according to this item!
    >>
    >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform...rce_Identifier

    >
    > What part of that item says that a numerical address disqualifies the string as
    > being a URL?



    Do you think I might have misunderstood this?

    "One can classify URIs as locators (URLs), or as names (URNs), or as
    both. A Uniform Resource Name (URN) functions like a person's name,
    while a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) resembles that person's street
    address. In other words: the URN defines an item's identity, while the
    URL provides a method for finding it."


    >> I learn a lot from being here on SE!

    >
    > Here's your chance to teach *me* something.
    >
    > Why isn't http://88.198.244.100/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier a URL?


    I'm considering first why I should be getting this response:-

    200 mx04.eternal-september.org InterNetNews NNRP server INN 2.6.0
    (20110502 snapshot) ready (posting ok)
    500 What?
    500 What?
    500 What?
    500 What?
    500 What?
    500 What?
    500 What?


    *

    Just going to wash my car. I'll be back later! :-)

    D.

  7. #7
    Dustin Guest

    Re: The Host's file

    "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in news:j0vo66$mt0$1
    @dont-email.me:

    > "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:Xns9F31D2724E994HHI2948AJD832@no...
    >> G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
    >> news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:
    >>
    >>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.
    >>>
    >>> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.

    >>
    >> Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...

    >
    > Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
    > instead of a name to look up? )


    Nope. URL is a name, IP is an.. You guessed it, IP! URL requires DNS
    help, actual IP doesn't.

    > Anyway, the server gets to decide what to do with your request.


    Of course.


    --
    I am a sinner
    Hold my prayers upto the sun
    I am a sinner
    Heaven's closed for what I've done.

  8. #8
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: The Host's file


    "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:Xns9F3492CC0679AHHI2948AJD832@no...
    > "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in news:j0vo66$mt0$1
    > @dont-email.me:
    >
    >> "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >> news:Xns9F31D2724E994HHI2948AJD832@no...
    >>> G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
    >>> news:jkl537puukrjda1tsqi8fu0pl3qnbvkvde@Osama-is-dead.net:
    >>>
    >>>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.
    >>>>
    >>>> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.
    >>>
    >>> Or use the sites known IP and forget the "URL" altogether...

    >>
    >> Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
    >> instead of a name to look up? )

    >
    > Nope. URL is a name, IP is an.. You guessed it, IP! URL requires DNS
    > help, actual IP doesn't.


    This time, I'll have to agree with Wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Locator
    "Every URL consists of some of the following: the scheme name (commonly called
    protocol), followed by a colon, then, depending on scheme, a domain name
    (alternatively, IP address), a port number, the path of the resource to be
    fetched or the program to be run, then, for programs such as Common Gateway
    Interface (CGI) scripts, a query string,[8][9] and an optional fragment
    identifier.[10]

    The syntax is
    scheme://domainort/path?query_string#fragment_id"

    They are in total agreement with what I had already understood to be the case,
    so I like their answer better than yours. It is *still* a URL whether a domain
    name (or other name) to IP address lookup is needed or not.



  9. #9
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: The Host's file

    From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com>

    >>>
    >>> Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
    >>> instead of a name to look up? )

    >>
    >> Nope. URL is a name, IP is an.. You guessed it, IP! URL requires DNS
    >> help, actual IP doesn't.

    >
    > This time, I'll have to agree with Wikipedia:
    >
    > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Locator
    > "Every URL consists of some of the following: the scheme name (commonly called
    > protocol), followed by a colon, then, depending on scheme, a domain name (alternatively,
    > IP address), a port number, the path of the resource to be fetched or the program to be
    > run, then, for programs such as Common Gateway Interface (CGI) scripts, a query
    > string,[8][9] and an optional fragment identifier.[10]
    >
    > The syntax is
    > scheme://domainort/path?query_string#fragment_id"
    >
    > They are in total agreement with what I had already understood to be the case, so I like
    > their answer better than yours. It is *still* a URL whether a domain name (or other
    > name) to IP address lookup is needed or not.
    >



    When does a URL become an IRL ?

    Local protocols like hcp ?
    Ex: hcp://system/HomePage.htm

    BTW: That syntax is incomplete:
    scheme://userassword@hostort/path

    PS: Remember to remove; alt.politics.scorched-earth

    --
    Dave
    Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
    http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  10. #10
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: The Host's file

    "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
    news:j173ll0tfr@news6.newsguy.com...
    > From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com>
    >
    >>>>
    >>>> Isn't it still a URL even if you use the numerical address
    >>>> instead of a name to look up? )
    >>>
    >>> Nope. URL is a name, IP is an.. You guessed it, IP! URL requires DNS
    >>> help, actual IP doesn't.

    >>
    >> This time, I'll have to agree with Wikipedia:
    >>
    >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Locator
    >> "Every URL consists of some of the following: the scheme name (commonly
    >> called protocol), followed by a colon, then, depending on scheme, a domain
    >> name (alternatively, IP address), a port number, the path of the resource to
    >> be fetched or the program to be run, then, for programs such as Common
    >> Gateway Interface (CGI) scripts, a query string,[8][9] and an optional
    >> fragment identifier.[10]
    >>
    >> The syntax is
    >> scheme://domainort/path?query_string#fragment_id"
    >>
    >> They are in total agreement with what I had already understood to be the
    >> case, so I like their answer better than yours. It is *still* a URL whether a
    >> domain name (or other name) to IP address lookup is needed or not.
    >>

    >
    >
    > When does a URL become an IRL ?
    >
    > Local protocols like hcp ?
    > Ex: hcp://system/HomePage.htm


    I don't know, maybe when localhost (127.0.0.1) is assumed by the protocol?

    I refer to RFC 1738 now:

    "host
    The fully qualified domain name of a network host, or its IP
    address as a set of four decimal digit groups separated by
    ".". Fully qualified domain names take the form as described
    in Section 3.5 of RFC 1034 [13] and Section 2.1 of RFC 1123
    [5]: ..."

    > BTW: That syntax is incomplete:
    > scheme://userassword@hostort/path


    Yes, this is in agreement with rfc 1738 and the "host" section excerpted above.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •