PCButts Infamous Pic of Dust**** Relaxing After Virus Writing

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know>

> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:11:35 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:
>
>> From: "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know>
>>
>>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:20:27 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:52:03 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To *GET* the text file, one *has* to visit a URL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or use the command line 'wget' in a sandbox, for the paranoid.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL. I use wget all the time, along with urpmi and apt-get. All
>>>>> command- line driven. I could use GUI applications, but I find the
>>>>> CLI faster and more convenient. Nothing to do with security.
>>>>>
>>>> I use it daily. Great for malware download scripting and I can use
>>>> *any* User-Agent.
>>>>
>>>> Core component of my Multi-AV.
>>>>
>>>> I'm using "Wget 1.12-2504 built on mingw32."
>>>
>>> "[root@aardvark2 ~]# wget -V
>>> GNU Wget 1.12 built on linux-gnu."
>>>
>> Originally there were problems on the Windows builds and that's why the
>> version still has the "2504" build in its versioning.
>
> Thanks. I was actually idly wondering about that.
>
> Did you need many (or any) dependencies fulfilled in order to install it
> on Windoze?
>

It comes with dependent SSL DLLs.


--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:36:43 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Free_software
>>
>> Can one see that page using 'Wget'?
>
> What do you think?

I do not know the answer.

I have only ever looked at a web site with a browser.

Just like 99.99% of people at a guess.

[Bullwinkle.]

Why do you Socialist mooches have such limited vocabulary?

Never finished school?

Too busy making road side bombs?

Oh Yea!


"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:j0urit$7me$5@dont-email.me...


What do you think, ****?

[~BD~]

Bullwinkle. wrote:

> Too busy making road side bombs?

He's already admitted trying to kill and maim British soldiers when he
was a teenager.

Even now, he still doesn't comprehend what an evil act that was. :-(

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:06:16 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Bullwinkle. wrote:
>
>> Too busy making road side bombs?
>
> He's already admitted trying to kill and maim British soldiers when he
> was a teenager.

Cite, ****.

>
> Even now, he still doesn't comprehend what an evil act that was. :-(

How can defence of one's community against a destructive invading
military force be 'evil', ****?



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[Aardvark]

http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/htt...ls/mailpv.html





--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:06:16 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Bullwinkle. wrote:
>>
>>> Too busy making road side bombs?
>>
>> He's already admitted trying to kill and maim British soldiers when he
>> was a teenager.
>
> Cite.

Sure .....

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi...nt-email.me%3E

You said "I also threw blast-bombs and nail bombs, ****. I taught others
how to make them. Until we ran out of industrial gelignite."

>> Even now, he still doesn't comprehend what an evil act that was. :-(
>
> How can defence of one's community against a destructive invading
> military force be 'evil', ****?

You were resisting the forces of law and order, legally engaged in
trying to keep the peace between Catholics and Protestants in a part of
*Britain* (whether you liked it or not!)

You were *wrong*.

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:37:10 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:06:16 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Bullwinkle. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Too busy making road side bombs?
>>>
>>> He's already admitted trying to kill and maim British soldiers when he
>>> was a teenager.
>>
>> Cite.
>
> Sure .....
>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi...Cj0hfup%24og8%
247%40dont-email.me%3E
>
> You said "I also threw blast-bombs and nail bombs, ****. I taught others
> how to make them. Until we ran out of industrial gelignite."
>

Where is the support for your notion that I tried to kill anyone, ****?

>>> Even now, he still doesn't comprehend what an evil act that was. :-(
>>
>> How can defence of one's community against a destructive invading
>> military force be 'evil', ****?
>
> You were resisting the forces of law and order, legally engaged in
> trying to keep the peace between Catholics and Protestants in a part of
> *Britain* (whether you liked it or not!)

There were *no* Protestants there, ****. If the army hadn't been there,
there would have been no need for us to defend anything.

>
> You were *wrong*.

Defence of one's community is *never* wrong, ****.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[David H. Lipman]

From: "G. Morgan" <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net>

> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Please tell me in simple terms, *how* one loads 'wget' onto one's
>> computer in the first place.
>
> MAC:

Don't provide that **** anything.
The way he acts and what he does on Usenet does NOT need to be rewarded with "help" or
"assistance."



--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[~BD~]

G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Please tell me in simple terms, *how* one loads 'wget' onto one's
>> computer in the first place.
>
> MAC:
> http://www.mactricksandtips.com/2008...-terminal.html
>

Thank you Graham. I have 'bookmarked' the *URL* for possible
implementation later. I appreciate your guidance.

Even on that page, there are links to lots of *URLs* - which open in a
browser, do they not?!!

*Any* of those URLs *could* be infected with Malware - most folk would
*never* know if they had actually been infected if they had received no
warning from their AV software (assuming they actually have one - fully
up to date!).

The *really* clever 'bad guys' will *always* be one step ahead of the AV
companies - they pay their recruits far more than the good guys! ;-)

D.