PCButts Infamous Pic of Dust**** Relaxing After Virus Writing

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know>

>
> You're wasting your time, David. BD is so deeply entrenched in his
> paranoia that he won't believe the truth of the matter.
>
> It doesn't take even half a brain to work out that, in order to cause a
> simple text file to cause any problems would take a lot of work and a
> number of conscious decisions on the part of the luzer.
>
> Not forgetting, a modicum of programming knowledge.


You are correct there. Didn't want third party readers to obtain or believe false
information from an uninformed post.

I watched his suggested video. Everything from ways to detect if it is running in a VM
(yeah, been seeing those techniques for years like detecting "drivers\vmmouse.sys" and )
to detecting IsDebuggerPresent() (see that string in countless binaries) to that simple
bat file. NOTHING in that video would indicate that a text file was used in any exploit
or malware vector. It was all overarching data on malware avoiding detection, exploiting
malware vulnerabilities due to bad programming and on OffensiveComputing as a web site.

Then when he is confronted with the lack of support for his misinformed and incorrect post
and the lack of supportive/corroborative information he posts another malicious activity
news report activity. Sheeeeeesh !


--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Aardvark]

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:37:33 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:

> From: "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know>
>
>
>> You're wasting your time, David. BD is so deeply entrenched in his
>> paranoia that he won't believe the truth of the matter.
>>
>> It doesn't take even half a brain to work out that, in order to cause a
>> simple text file to cause any problems would take a lot of work and a
>> number of conscious decisions on the part of the luzer.
>>
>> Not forgetting, a modicum of programming knowledge.
>
>
> You are correct there. Didn't want third party readers to obtain or
> believe false information from an uninformed post.
>

It's a bit much when there always has to be someone watching the ****er
in order to immediately correct incorrect information he gives or slimy
insinuations he makes, just in case some poor no0b reads it and takes it
as gospel.

> I watched his suggested video.

I didn't :-)

> Everything from ways to detect if it is
> running in a VM (yeah, been seeing those techniques for years like
> detecting "drivers\vmmouse.sys" and ) to detecting IsDebuggerPresent()
> (see that string in countless binaries) to that simple bat file.
> NOTHING in that video would indicate that a text file was used in any
> exploit or malware vector.

That'd be some trick if someone could find a way to do it.

> It was all overarching data on malware
> avoiding detection, exploiting malware vulnerabilities due to bad
> programming and on OffensiveComputing as a web site.

What? No malicious text-files? I'm shocked.

>
> Then when he is confronted with the lack of support for his misinformed
> and incorrect post and the lack of supportive/corroborative information
> he posts another malicious activity news report activity. Sheeeeeesh !

Sheeeeeesh! Indeed.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”