Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

[Aardvark]

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:14:49 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in news:j0csfp$gto$4@dont-
> email.me:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:32:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.
>>
>> ****ing typical, ****.
>>
>> Once again, you prove my point that you can't be trusted with private
>> communications.
>
> Hehe. It's why the only email he has recently from me has no source IP
> to trace back to, well.. anywhere. [g].
>
> His second email is a bit lengthly, if he wants to post it, I can't stop
> him.

As soon as you made clear that you had emailed him, I thought, bad idea-
I wonder how long it'll take the **** to copy and paste the contents of a
*personal* email to usenet without explicit permission to do so.

Looks like I know now.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[Dustin]

Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in
news:j0da6t$f0n$1@dont-email.me:

> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:14:49 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>
>> Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in
>> news:j0csfp$gto$4@dont- email.me:
>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:32:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.
>>>
>>> ****ing typical, ****.
>>>
>>> Once again, you prove my point that you can't be trusted with
>>> private communications.
>>
>> Hehe. It's why the only email he has recently from me has no source
>> IP to trace back to, well.. anywhere. [g].
>>
>> His second email is a bit lengthly, if he wants to post it, I can't
>> stop him.
>
> As soon as you made clear that you had emailed him, I thought, bad
> idea- I wonder how long it'll take the **** to copy and paste the
> contents of a *personal* email to usenet without explicit permission
> to do so.
>
> Looks like I know now.

I'll save him the bother.. Here's the email I sent, I didn't think it
necessary to go public as he admits defeat here... But, since he's
wanting to do this:

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:47qdnYI6o9SXnL7TnZ2dnUVZ7vudnZ2d@bt.com:

> Message-ID: <tLWdnWpZFt48ub3TnZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d@bt.com>
>
> I meant what I said.
>
> I was saddened to hear about the loss of your friend.
>
> I know what that is like - I've been to too many funerals.
>
> D.

Hello David.

I appreciate you sharing the .jpg file. It explained things for me. I
will not be pressuring you for an apology in the newsgroup; I believe
the .jpg is as close of an apology as I'm going to get. I don't need
nor want you on your knees and it's wrong of me to try and go that
far. I'm really not the ******* the anonymous remailer is trying to
make me out to be.

You've given me what I wanted, I will leave you in peace. As I am a
person of my word, your information will be secure wiped and I will
not pursue you further.

-END OF FILE



--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over