Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
newss-dnX_wCP9m7brTnZ2dnUVZ8gKdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Btw, have you read the email I sent you a few days ago? I would
> appreciate a response.

Yes. BD, You should re-read the terms I laid out for you. I won't give
you another opportunity.


--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> newss-dnX_wCP9m7brTnZ2dnUVZ8gKdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Btw, have you read the email I sent you a few days ago? I would
>> appreciate a response.
>
> Yes. BD, You should re-read the terms I laid out for you. I won't give
> you another opportunity.

Dustin - I'm here shakin' in my boots!

Now ..... do the *right* thing.

*Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.

D.

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:32:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.

****ing typical, ****.

Once again, you prove my point that you can't be trusted with private
communications.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:32:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.
>
> ****ing typical, ****.
>
> Once again, you prove my point that you can't be trusted with private
> communications.
>
>
>

What I choose to post is *my* decision! :-)

[Aardvark]

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:13:03 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:32:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.
>>
>> ****ing typical, ****.
>>
>> Once again, you prove my point that you can't be trusted with private
>> communications.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> What I choose to post is *my* decision! :-)

What you choose to post shows that you can't be trusted, ****.

--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:BbydnfzTs_nPcbTTnZ2dnUVZ8gGdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Dustin wrote:
>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
>> newss-dnX_wCP9m7brTnZ2dnUVZ8gKdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>
>>> Btw, have you read the email I sent you a few days ago? I would
>>> appreciate a response.
>>
>> Yes. BD, You should re-read the terms I laid out for you. I won't
give
>> you another opportunity.
>
> Dustin - I'm here shakin' in my boots!

Heh...

> Now ..... do the *right* thing.

?

> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.

BD,

You may do with the emails as you see fit. I thought I was being
honorable and not posting them. I emailed you as I didn't think it
needed to be public. If you wish to make it public, that's your
perrogative.


--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over

[Dustin]

Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in news:j0csfp$gto$4@dont-
email.me:

> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:32:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.
>
> ****ing typical, ****.
>
> Once again, you prove my point that you can't be trusted with private
> communications.

Hehe. It's why the only email he has recently from me has no source IP to
trace back to, well.. anywhere. [g].

His second email is a bit lengthly, if he wants to post it, I can't stop
him.


--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:BbydnfzTs_nPcbTTnZ2dnUVZ8gGdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Dustin - I'm here shakin' in my boots!

I realize that if I came to your house, and introduced myself, even
after giving you a few lumps; you'd still turn right around and say
something smart. I *know* you well, David.

I meant what I wrote in the email; and I will honour my word. I don't
like you, David. I probably never will, but despite your goading, I
won't intentionally make you a target anymore so than I've already
done; as tempting as it is to do that to you. You just don't know what
you're doing.

> Now ..... do the *right* thing.

I've contemplated it. I really have, David. I came *very close* to
seeing you in person last week. Didn't you wonder why I hadn't posted
much? [g]

> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.

With regard to the emails...

Which one do you intend to post? It doesn't matter. If you wish to
provide the remailer potential ammunition, do so.


--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over

[Aardvark]

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:14:49 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in news:j0csfp$gto$4@dont-
> email.me:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:32:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.
>>
>> ****ing typical, ****.
>>
>> Once again, you prove my point that you can't be trusted with private
>> communications.
>
> Hehe. It's why the only email he has recently from me has no source IP
> to trace back to, well.. anywhere. [g].
>
> His second email is a bit lengthly, if he wants to post it, I can't stop
> him.

As soon as you made clear that you had emailed him, I thought, bad idea-
I wonder how long it'll take the **** to copy and paste the contents of a
*personal* email to usenet without explicit permission to do so.

Looks like I know now.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[Dustin]

Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in
news:j0da6t$f0n$1@dont-email.me:

> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:14:49 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>
>> Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in
>> news:j0csfp$gto$4@dont- email.me:
>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:32:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> *Answer* my email - before I post it to Usenet.
>>>
>>> ****ing typical, ****.
>>>
>>> Once again, you prove my point that you can't be trusted with
>>> private communications.
>>
>> Hehe. It's why the only email he has recently from me has no source
>> IP to trace back to, well.. anywhere. [g].
>>
>> His second email is a bit lengthly, if he wants to post it, I can't
>> stop him.
>
> As soon as you made clear that you had emailed him, I thought, bad
> idea- I wonder how long it'll take the **** to copy and paste the
> contents of a *personal* email to usenet without explicit permission
> to do so.
>
> Looks like I know now.

I'll save him the bother.. Here's the email I sent, I didn't think it
necessary to go public as he admits defeat here... But, since he's
wanting to do this:

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:47qdnYI6o9SXnL7TnZ2dnUVZ7vudnZ2d@bt.com:

> Message-ID: <tLWdnWpZFt48ub3TnZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d@bt.com>
>
> I meant what I said.
>
> I was saddened to hear about the loss of your friend.
>
> I know what that is like - I've been to too many funerals.
>
> D.

Hello David.

I appreciate you sharing the .jpg file. It explained things for me. I
will not be pressuring you for an apology in the newsgroup; I believe
the .jpg is as close of an apology as I'm going to get. I don't need
nor want you on your knees and it's wrong of me to try and go that
far. I'm really not the ******* the anonymous remailer is trying to
make me out to be.

You've given me what I wanted, I will leave you in peace. As I am a
person of my word, your information will be secure wiped and I will
not pursue you further.

-END OF FILE



--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over