Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

[Aardvark]

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:51:22 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:

> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
> news:N_ydnc9lp7SF5brTnZ2dnUVZ8hidnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:21:15 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>> [....]
>>
>>>> Dustin - read this:-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Two years ago when i posted that message MBAM had a lot of issues
>>>> and a few of their team members had personal issues with me. They
>>>> have since cleaned up their act, their professionalism, and their
>>>> image by getting rid of bad employees and making great updates in
>>>> their product. I have no more issues with them and I recommend MBAM
>>>> as it is a good product.
>>>>
>>>> July 20, 2011 7:32 AM"
>>>>
>>>> http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspo.../shame-on-you-
malware-
>>> bytes-antimalware.html
>>>>
>>>> (in the comments section)
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>> Btw, have you read the email I sent you a few days ago? I would
>>>> appreciate a response.
>>>
>>> The words of PCButts and therefore to be taken with a large pinch of
>>> salt, to say the least.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Let me reiterate. He said ......
>>
>> "*I recommend MBAM* as it is a good product".
>
> Yes, but we know that your post was all about that first part about
> personal issues and not about the recommendation itself.
>
> PCButts' 'personal issue' was with those that outed him as the liar and
> thief that he is - and some of those people were associated with the
> company. Since they are no longer working directly for the company,
> PCButts (and you) are trying to imply that they were "dismissed" rather
> than just not working directly for the company anymore.
>
> I know, you knew this already, but this was for any readers that haven't
> a 'program' to go along with this opera.

Thanks for posting that. It had crossed my mind right after I made my
previous post, but I just couldn't be arsed arguing with that slimy ****
BD, who it was obvious knew what were the implications contained in what
he wrote.

Just more of his slime, if you ask me.


--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know>

>
> BD has been told in no uncertain terms and quite strenuously by many
> people about Butts, and yet he still insists on quoting the ****er as if
> he's some kind of believable source of information.
>

It's amazing how he believes the falsehoods spewed by Butts and yet he questions the
validity of the undeniable safe vetting of Malwarebytes.

The guy is... < censored >



--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Aardvark]

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:12:13 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> He used such foul language as a term of endearment with Dustin.

Dustin is a good ****. You're just a ****, ****.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[Aardvark]

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:51:28 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:

> From: "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know>
>
>
>> BD has been told in no uncertain terms and quite strenuously by many
>> people about Butts, and yet he still insists on quoting the ****er as
>> if he's some kind of believable source of information.
>>
>>
> It's amazing how he believes the falsehoods spewed by Butts and yet he
> questions the validity of the undeniable safe vetting of Malwarebytes.
>

He has said in the past that he has accepted that just about everything
that some people say should be considered dubious at best. Despite his
professed acceptance of this, it doesn't stop him from quoting their
words as truth when it suits him, or his agenda.

> The guy is... < censored >





--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[G. Morgan]

Aardvark wrote:

>On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:12:54 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:19:34 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>The words of PCButts, ****, and therefore to be taken with a large
>>>>>pinch of salt, to say the least.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I pinched a loaf worth more than PCButts opinion.
>>>
>>>Dunno what the **** BD is doing citing anything from Butts when he knows
>>>that no one places any credibility in what Butts has to say.
>>>
>>>If I didn't previously have experience of MBAM and had read Butts'
>>>recommendation, I'd be wary enough of it to do further research on it
>>>before touching it with a barge-pole. Or even steer well clear.
>>
>> If you didn't have previous experience with Butts, you wouldn't have
>> known to ignore everything coming from it.
>
>BD has been told in no uncertain terms and quite strenuously by many
>people about Butts, and yet he still insists on quoting the ****er as if
>he's some kind of believable source of information.

I'm pretty sure I was in on some of that too, IIRC.

[G. Morgan]

Aardvark wrote:

>On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:14:50 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>>****, Butts accidentally told one truth, ****.
>>>
>>>> Are you saying that you do not believe that to be true?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I know MBAM is good and have known for quite some time, ****, despite
>>>your disparaging innuendo regarding the product.
>>>
>>>> Seems like a pretty good endorsement to me!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>*Nothing* Butts says can be taken as truth unless it's double-checked,
>>>****.
>>>
>>>> Maybe you're still not thinking straight.
>>>
>>>My thinking is fine, ****?
>>>
>>>> See a doctor.
>>>
>>>Why would I want to do that, ****?
>>
>> Tourette's Syndrome?
>
>No, mate. Addressing BD by his innate and hard-worked-for title.

I cee. No language-barrier mate!

[JD]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Aardvark"<aardvark@youllnever.know>
>
>>
>> BD has been told in no uncertain terms and quite strenuously by many
>> people about Butts, and yet he still insists on quoting the ****er as if
>> he's some kind of believable source of information.
>>
>
> It's amazing how he believes the falsehoods spewed by Butts and yet he questions the
> validity of the undeniable safe vetting of Malwarebytes.
>
> The guy is...< censored>
>
>
>

Why do you continue to engage yourself in this troll back and forth?

You're on the verge of resurrecting PC Butts. Please don't do that.

KillFile the trolls and let peace reign once again. Please?

--
JD..

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
newss-dnX_wCP9m7brTnZ2dnUVZ8gKdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Dustin wrote:
>> "David H. Lipman"<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in
>> news:j01sq10142o@news4.newsguy.com:
>>
>>> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com>
>>>
>>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please note: Since BD was kicked off the Malwarebytes' forum
>>>>> for posting improper, sexually oriented, graphics he seeks out
>>>>> to besmirch Malwarebytes whenever, wherever, possible.
>>>>>
>>>> Ah! :-)
>>>>
>>>> Do you know, David - I thought it was because I had the gall to
>>>> suggest that the programme might well eradicate all manner of
>>>> malware - but might possibly (just *possibly*) insert either a
>>>> Trojan or a 'back door' onto the otherwise cleaned computer.
>>>>
>>>> David - tell folk here *why* you were dismissed from employment
>>>> by Malwarebytes. I'm sure readers would like to know.
>>>
>>> Look you piece of ****, I was not dismissed. I resigned. It was
>>> my decision, my choice and for my reasons.
>>>
>>> Gee, so much for that statement that you "never lie". You just
>>> did - twice.
>>
>> Yes, yes he did..
>>
>>
>
> Dustin - read this:-
>
>
> "Two years ago when i posted that message MBAM had a lot of issues
> and a few of their team members had personal issues with me. They
> have since cleaned up their act, their professionalism, and their
> image by getting rid of bad employees and making great updates in
> their product. I have no more issues with them and I recommend MBAM
> as it is a good product.

Bawahahahahaha.
Okay.

> Btw, have you read the email I sent you a few days ago? I would
> appreciate a response.

Yep, I have. No response is required on my end.


--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over

[Dustin]

"FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in
news:j09vvs$oif$1@dont-email.me:

> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
> news:N_ydnc9lp7SF5brTnZ2dnUVZ8hidnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:21:15 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>> [....]
>>
>>>> Dustin - read this:-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Two years ago when i posted that message MBAM had a lot of
>>>> issues and a few of their team members had personal issues with
>>>> me. They have since cleaned up their act, their professionalism,
>>>> and their image by getting rid of bad employees and making great
>>>> updates in their product. I have no more issues with them and I
>>>> recommend MBAM as it is a good product.
>>>>
>>>> July 20, 2011 7:32 AM"
>>>>
>>>> http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspo...ame-on-you-mal
>>>> ware-
>>> bytes-antimalware.html
>>>>
>>>> (in the comments section)
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>> Btw, have you read the email I sent you a few days ago? I would
>>>> appreciate a response.
>>>
>>> The words of PCButts and therefore to be taken with a large pinch
>>> of salt, to say the least.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Let me reiterate. He said ......
>>
>> "*I recommend MBAM* as it is a good product".
>
> Yes, but we know that your post was all about that first part about
> personal issues and not about the recommendation itself.
>
> PCButts' 'personal issue' was with those that outed him as the liar
> and thief that he is - and some of those people were associated
> with the company. Since they are no longer working directly for
> the company, PCButts (and you) are trying to imply that they were
> "dismissed" rather than just not working directly for the company
> anymore.
>
> I know, you knew this already, but this was for any readers that
> haven't a 'program' to go along with this opera.

Like, oh, say, G. Morgan for example?


--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over

[Dustin]

JD <JD@example.invalid> wrote in
news:8OOdnQ5BCpb5ZbXTnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@posted.grand ecom:

> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "Aardvark"<aardvark@youllnever.know>
>>
>>>
>>> BD has been told in no uncertain terms and quite strenuously by
>>> many people about Butts, and yet he still insists on quoting the
>>> ****er as if he's some kind of believable source of information.
>>>
>>
>> It's amazing how he believes the falsehoods spewed by Butts and yet
>> he questions the validity of the undeniable safe vetting of
>> Malwarebytes.
>>
>> The guy is...< censored>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Why do you continue to engage yourself in this troll back and forth?
>
> You're on the verge of resurrecting PC Butts. Please don't do that.

I'll just call him again at work. [g]



--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over