Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 117

Thread: Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

  1. #21
    Bullwinkle. Guest

    Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    Speech Therapist would help you a lot.


    "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
    news:j099ej$lkv$2@dont-email.me...

    ****, Butts accidentally told one truth, ****.


    I know MBAM is good and have known for quite some time, ****,

    *Nothing* Butts says can be taken as truth unless it's double-checked,
    ****.

    My thinking is fine, ****?

    > See a doctor.


    Why would I want to do that, ****?





  2. #22
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    Aardvark wrote:

    >On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:19:34 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
    >
    >> Aardvark wrote:
    >>
    >>>The words of PCButts, ****, and therefore to be taken with a large pinch
    >>>of salt, to say the least.

    >>
    >>
    >> I pinched a loaf worth more than PCButts opinion.

    >
    >Dunno what the **** BD is doing citing anything from Butts when he knows
    >that no one places any credibility in what Butts has to say.
    >
    >If I didn't previously have experience of MBAM and had read Butts'
    >recommendation, I'd be wary enough of it to do further research on it
    >before touching it with a barge-pole. Or even steer well clear.


    If you didn't have previous experience with Butts, you wouldn't have
    known to ignore everything coming from it.

  3. #23
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    Aardvark wrote:

    >****, Butts accidentally told one truth, ****.
    >
    >> Are you saying that you do not believe that to be true?
    >>

    >
    >I know MBAM is good and have known for quite some time, ****, despite
    >your disparaging innuendo regarding the product.
    >
    >> Seems like a pretty good endorsement to me!
    >>

    >
    >*Nothing* Butts says can be taken as truth unless it's double-checked,
    >****.
    >
    >> Maybe you're still not thinking straight.

    >
    >My thinking is fine, ****?
    >
    >> See a doctor.

    >
    >Why would I want to do that, ****?


    Tourette's Syndrome?


  4. #24
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    news:N_ydnc9lp7SF5brTnZ2dnUVZ8hidnZ2d@bt.com...
    > Aardvark wrote:
    >> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:21:15 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

    >
    > [....]
    >
    >>> Dustin - read this:-
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> "Two years ago when i posted that message MBAM had a lot of issues and a
    >>> few of their team members had personal issues with me. They have since
    >>> cleaned up their act, their professionalism, and their image by getting
    >>> rid of bad employees and making great updates in their product. I have
    >>> no more issues with them and I recommend MBAM as it is a good product.
    >>>
    >>> July 20, 2011 7:32 AM"
    >>>
    >>> http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspo...n-you-malware-

    >> bytes-antimalware.html
    >>>
    >>> (in the comments section)
    >>>
    >>> **
    >>>
    >>> Btw, have you read the email I sent you a few days ago? I would
    >>> appreciate a response.

    >>
    >> The words of PCButts and therefore to be taken with a large pinch
    >> of salt, to say the least.
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Let me reiterate. He said ......
    >
    > "*I recommend MBAM* as it is a good product".


    Yes, but we know that your post was all about that first part about
    personal issues and not about the recommendation itself.

    PCButts' 'personal issue' was with those that outed him as the liar
    and thief that he is - and some of those people were associated
    with the company. Since they are no longer working directly for
    the company, PCButts (and you) are trying to imply that they were
    "dismissed" rather than just not working directly for the company
    anymore.

    I know, you knew this already, but this was for any readers that
    haven't a 'program' to go along with this opera.



  5. #25
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: {OMFG!} ~BD~ defending PCBUTTS.......... (was)Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    "JD" <JD@example.invalid> wrote in message
    news:EqOdnbIOoYaAALrTnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@posted.grand ecom...
    > Ignore the troll, plonk the troll. The troll disappears.
    >
    > Continue to feed the troll and PCbutts comes back to life.


    It doesn't work that way, and never has.



  6. #26
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    G. Morgan wrote:
    > Aardvark wrote:
    >
    >> ****, Butts accidentally told one truth, ****.
    >>
    >>> Are you saying that you do not believe that to be true?
    >>>

    >>
    >> I know MBAM is good and have known for quite some time, ****, despite
    >> your disparaging innuendo regarding the product.
    >>
    >>> Seems like a pretty good endorsement to me!
    >>>

    >>
    >> *Nothing* Butts says can be taken as truth unless it's double-checked,
    >> ****.
    >>
    >>> Maybe you're still not thinking straight.

    >>
    >> My thinking is fine, ****?
    >>
    >>> See a doctor.

    >>
    >> Why would I want to do that, ****?

    >
    > Tourette's Syndrome?


    >


    Ha! He used such foul language as a term of endearment with Dustin.

    Do you not think he's treating me as a buddy too? <rolls eyes>

  7. #27
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    ~BD~ wrote:

    >G. Morgan wrote:
    >> Aardvark wrote:
    >>
    >>> ****, Butts accidentally told one truth, ****.
    >>>
    >>>> Are you saying that you do not believe that to be true?
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> I know MBAM is good and have known for quite some time, ****, despite
    >>> your disparaging innuendo regarding the product.
    >>>
    >>>> Seems like a pretty good endorsement to me!
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> *Nothing* Butts says can be taken as truth unless it's double-checked,
    >>> ****.
    >>>
    >>>> Maybe you're still not thinking straight.
    >>>
    >>> My thinking is fine, ****?
    >>>
    >>>> See a doctor.
    >>>
    >>> Why would I want to do that, ****?

    >>
    >> Tourette's Syndrome?

    >
    >>

    >
    >Ha! He used such foul language as a term of endearment with Dustin.
    >
    >Do you not think he's treating me as a buddy too? <rolls eyes>


    **** if I know. AFAIK that's a Euro-Aussie thing.

    Around these parts only gays say that to each other.


  8. #28
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com>

    > "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:N_ydnc9lp7SF5brTnZ2dnUVZ8hidnZ2d@bt.com...
    >> Aardvark wrote:
    >>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:21:15 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

    >>
    >> [....]
    >>
    >>>> Dustin - read this:-
    >>>>
    >>>> "Two years ago when i posted that message MBAM had a lot of issues and a
    >>>> few of their team members had personal issues with me. They have since
    >>>> cleaned up their act, their professionalism, and their image by getting
    >>>> rid of bad employees and making great updates in their product. I have
    >>>> no more issues with them and I recommend MBAM as it is a good product.
    >>>>
    >>>> July 20, 2011 7:32 AM"
    >>>>
    >>>> http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspo...n-you-malware-
    >>> bytes-antimalware.html
    >>>>
    >>>> (in the comments section)
    >>>>
    >>>> **
    >>>>
    >>>> Btw, have you read the email I sent you a few days ago? I would
    >>>> appreciate a response.
    >>>
    >>> The words of PCButts and therefore to be taken with a large pinch
    >>> of salt, to say the least.
    >>>

    >> Let me reiterate. He said ......
    >>
    >> "*I recommend MBAM* as it is a good product".

    >
    > Yes, but we know that your post was all about that first part about
    > personal issues and not about the recommendation itself.
    >
    > PCButts' 'personal issue' was with those that outed him as the liar
    > and thief that he is - and some of those people were associated
    > with the company. Since they are no longer working directly for
    > the company, PCButts (and you) are trying to imply that they were
    > "dismissed" rather than just not working directly for the company
    > anymore.
    >
    > I know, you knew this already, but this was for any readers that
    > haven't a 'program' to go along with this opera.


    Actually, many still are. He (Butts) just doesn't know it.

    You hit the nail on the head. Note the timing involved as well. ;-)


    --
    Dave
    Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
    http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  9. #29
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:12:54 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:

    > Aardvark wrote:
    >
    >>On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:19:34 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
    >>
    >>> Aardvark wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>The words of PCButts, ****, and therefore to be taken with a large
    >>>>pinch of salt, to say the least.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> I pinched a loaf worth more than PCButts opinion.

    >>
    >>Dunno what the **** BD is doing citing anything from Butts when he knows
    >>that no one places any credibility in what Butts has to say.
    >>
    >>If I didn't previously have experience of MBAM and had read Butts'
    >>recommendation, I'd be wary enough of it to do further research on it
    >>before touching it with a barge-pole. Or even steer well clear.

    >
    > If you didn't have previous experience with Butts, you wouldn't have
    > known to ignore everything coming from it.


    BD has been told in no uncertain terms and quite strenuously by many
    people about Butts, and yet he still insists on quoting the ****er as if
    he's some kind of believable source of information.



    --
    "Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
    lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
    sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
    practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

  10. #30
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

    On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:14:50 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:

    > Aardvark wrote:
    >
    >>****, Butts accidentally told one truth, ****.
    >>
    >>> Are you saying that you do not believe that to be true?
    >>>
    >>>

    >>I know MBAM is good and have known for quite some time, ****, despite
    >>your disparaging innuendo regarding the product.
    >>
    >>> Seems like a pretty good endorsement to me!
    >>>
    >>>

    >>*Nothing* Butts says can be taken as truth unless it's double-checked,
    >>****.
    >>
    >>> Maybe you're still not thinking straight.

    >>
    >>My thinking is fine, ****?
    >>
    >>> See a doctor.

    >>
    >>Why would I want to do that, ****?

    >
    > Tourette's Syndrome?


    No, mate. Addressing BD by his innate and hard-worked-for title.



    --
    "Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
    lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
    sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
    practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •