Re: [OT] Malwarebytes as a business

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:0f6dnUxEtsSxq7HTnZ2dnUVZ7qSdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Do you really think *I* could forge a header?!!! ;-)
>
> I think you could, if you took the time. It's not that difficult.

I'd rather be upfront and honest!

>> Might help to change the perception others have of you, Dustin.
>
> LOL! It won't change anything for me, David.

Perhaps your right.

>> If PF *has* put one on *my* computer, he and his colleagues may have
>> put them on thousands of other machines too. Surreptitiously of
>> course.
>
> It's my personal opinion that you're being overly paranoid. Yes, it's
> possible if you visited something he setup. But, not very likely.

It's not a case of being paranoid, Dustin, I'm simply interested. Let's
just say, for example, if one went to http://aumha.net/ could a web bug
be installed simply by the action of going to the URL?

If you went there as a 'test', you said you would be able to locate
same. Like to carry out an experiment and take a look?

>> Would the 'average' PC user *ever* know such a bug was resident?
>
> Define average user.

The kind of folk who ask a myriad of questions on the numerous 'help'
sites around the internet. ie non-techie folk who just use their
computers to send email, write letters and surf the 'net

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:9dWdnbXqK7QiH7HTnZ2dnUVZ8g-dnZ2d@bt.com...

> It's not a case of being paranoid, Dustin, I'm simply interested. Let's just say,
> for example, if one went to http://aumha.net/ could a web bug be installed simply
> by the action of going to the URL?


LOL.Your paranoia never fails with you. Good luck

^%$(*&()

[Aardvark]

On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:38:23 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> If you went there as a 'test', you said you would be able to locate
> same. Like to carry out an experiment and take a look?

He won't, ****. Even if he did, he certainly wouldn't tell you.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:9dWdnbXqK7QiH7HTnZ2dnUVZ8g-dnZ2d@bt.com:

> I'd rather be upfront and honest!

Why did I have to hunt you down then? Why not just fork over your details
to begin with? [g]. Don't be coy, you aren't that good.

> Perhaps your right.

nothing in the positive would come of it, David.

> Like to carry out an experiment and take a look?

Nope. To this day, I'm still *not* interested in that forum.

> The kind of folk who ask a myriad of questions on the numerous
> 'help' sites around the internet. ie non-techie folk who just use
> their computers to send email, write letters and surf the 'net

Probably not then, no.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:9dWdnbXqK7QiH7HTnZ2dnUVZ8g-dnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> I'd rather be upfront and honest!
>
> Why did I have to hunt you down then? Why not just fork over your details
> to begin with? [g]. Don't be coy, you aren't that good.

Maybe all you had to do was ask me - in an email?!!

>> Perhaps your right.
>
> nothing in the positive would come of it, David.

That sure is negative thinking, Dustin. :-(

"Believe it, and you'll see it!"

>> Like to carry out an experiment and take a look?
>
> Nope. To this day, I'm still *not* interested in that forum.


How about this page then? http://www.annexcafe.com/

At the very least, please explain why www.googlesyndication.com and
www.live.com are wanting to run on that URL - TIA


>> The kind of folk who ask a myriad of questions on the numerous
>> 'help' sites around the internet. ie non-techie folk who just use
>> their computers to send email, write letters and surf the 'net
>
> Probably not then, no.

You may have noticed the recent discussion on SE - Aardvark has /made/
one but doesn't believe it could be left inside a computer to *spy*!

What do *you* think, Dustin?

[Bullwinkle.]

Easier:
http://www.spyshop.co.uk/Cameras/covert-spy-cameras

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:sMqdnScgf-ZEh7DTnZ2dnUVZ8g2dnZ2d@bt.com...

You may have noticed the recent discussion on SE - Aardvark has /made/
one but doesn't believe it could be left inside a computer to *spy*!

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:sMqdnScgf-ZEh7DTnZ2dnUVZ8g2dnZ2d@bt.com:

> Maybe all you had to do was ask me - in an email?!!

Uh right.. I didn't get the impression you'd be forthcoming.

> That sure is negative thinking, Dustin. :-(

No, that's the realist in me.

> "Believe it, and you'll see it!"

Doesn't work that way. Need an example? Seen the remailer posts? I no
longer see them, but I know he's still flooding. ;p

> How about this page then? http://www.annexcafe.com/

Nope.

> You may have noticed the recent discussion on SE - Aardvark has
> /made/ one but doesn't believe it could be left inside a computer to
> *spy*!

Well, that's because you are talking about one kind of web bug; I was
including both styles. Not really web bug, but silly enough terminology
where it might work. [g]

> What do *you* think, Dustin?

See above.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.