Malwarebytes quietly becomes a big player in anti-malware software

[David H. Lipman]

From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com>

> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
>> news:PoidnfeG-9338rnTnZ2dnUVZ8rGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:ToKdnXPsv-I42bnTnZ2dnUVZ7r-dnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>> “The point is we can protect the internet community as a whole by
>>>>> stopping malware from being distributed to millions of people,”
>>>>> Kleczynski said.
>>>>>
>>>>> No mention of the work done by Dustin Cook and David Lipman though! :-(
>>>>
>>>> Typical Trolling post. It would not have been have you not added the
>>>> line above. WTF are you riding that stupid ignorant thoughts. Looks like
>>>> you are accusing Cook and Lipmann of lying . What an idiot you are
>>>
>>> Lying?
>>>
>>> Not at all.
>>>
>>> They must both be disappointed, though, that the 'company' dispensed with
>>> their services before Malwarebytes became *really* successful.
>>>
>>> I have no idea why they were dismissed though.
>>
>> Are you claiming that they were "dismissed" or "dispensed with"?
>>
>> If so, please cite some sort of reference for me to investigate.
>
> I am not claiming anything. Neither person is now employed by Malwarebytes. I do not
> know why; it is none of my business, is it?
>
> Why would *you* want to investigate? It's none of *your* business either - is it?
>
>> I somebody quits, I can see it being called "let go" but not "dismissed"
>> or "dispensed with" because those two terms have a definite negative
>> connotation.
>
> Do they? I was unaware that Mr Lipman had chosen to 'quit' of his own volition. Maybe
> he will now explain *why* he chose to leave such a flourishing company if he really was
> a key player. Being truthful will help.

BULLSH!T
You did that same insinuation months ago and at theat time I gave youy the SAME answert
that I resigned.

>
>> Are you attempting to imply something, or just willing to let others infer
>> wrongly that these researchers were sub-standard?
>
> Folk have to judge for themselves.
>
>> You definitely deserve a visit if it is either the former or the latter. Why
>> not just dispense with the slimy innuendo now that your targets have
>> shown you that they know where you live. You're just begging for some
>> anonymous foul play with real life consequences.
>
> My only *target* has been Foldes and his cronies at Aumha. If I have to suffer
> 'consequences' in real life to bring out the truth, then so be it. Suitable
> documentation will survive to help track down any miscreants.


Your targets are anybody that fails to provied you the information you want or how that
information fits your, bubble off plumb, perception.

EoD

--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[~BD~]

David H. Lipman wrote:
[....]
> BULLSH!T
> You did that same insinuation months ago and at theat time I gave youy the SAME answert
> that I resigned.


Really? Cite the MID.


>>> Are you attempting to imply something, or just willing to let others infer
>>> wrongly that these researchers were sub-standard?
>>
>> Folk have to judge for themselves.
>>
>>> You definitely deserve a visit if it is either the former or the latter. Why
>>> not just dispense with the slimy innuendo now that your targets have
>>> shown you that they know where you live. You're just begging for some
>>> anonymous foul play with real life consequences.
>>
>> My only *target* has been Foldes and his cronies at Aumha. If I have to suffer
>> 'consequences' in real life to bring out the truth, then so be it. Suitable
>> documentation will survive to help track down any miscreants.
>
>
> Your targets are anybody that fails to provied you the information you want or how that
> information fits your, bubble off plumb, perception.
>
> EoD


Why *DID* you resign, DH Lipman?

Why *do* you publish your Multi-AV-Scanning-Tool facility on a foreign
(Swiss) website?

[Bullwinkle.]

Do you still diddle little boys?


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:N4ydnfQXfYewFLnTnZ2dnUVZ8iCdnZ2d@bt.com...

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:YemdnRKZhpUI7rnTnZ2dnUVZ8oudnZ2d@bt.com...

>>>I am simply seeking the truth.

Then answer up and go ask the Mrs.


Were you at the (mooslim) rally yesterday?

Answer careful CCTV does not lie.(like you).

As a seeker of truth have you asked your wife
who pleasured her all those nights you were not home?
(then you might know who one of us is)

Are you the father of your daughters baby?

You have never denied it, so the odds stack you are.


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message

[Bullwinkle.]

You're such a AK45


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:5didnWilcfsaGLnTnZ2dnUVZ8kSdnZ2d@bt.com...
My only *target* has been Foldes and his cronies at Aumha. If I have to
suffer 'consequences' in real life to bring out the truth, then so be
it. Suitable documentation will survive to help track down any miscreants.

[FromTheRafters]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:5didnWilcfsaGLnTnZ2dnUVZ8kSdnZ2d@bt.com...
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
>> news:PoidnfeG-9338rnTnZ2dnUVZ8rGdnZ2d@bt.com...

>>> They must both be disappointed, though, that the 'company' dispensed with
>>> their services before Malwarebytes became *really* successful.
>>>
>>> I have no idea why they were dismissed though.
>>
>> Are you claiming that they were "dismissed" or "dispensed with"?
>>
>> If so, please cite some sort of reference for me to investigate.
>
> I am not claiming anything. Neither person is now employed by Malwarebytes. I
> do not know why; it is none of my business, is it?

No, it isn't.

> Why would *you* want to investigate? It's none of *your* business either - is
> it?

I want to believe that you tell the truth, but it is very hard to do so when
you phrase your questions in such an accusing way. It would be like me
asking you why you let your son die without lifting a finger to help him. It's
not lying, but it's not being truthful either.

>> I somebody quits, I can see it being called "let go" but not "dismissed"
>> or "dispensed with" because those two terms have a definite negative
>> connotation.
>
> Do they?

You know damned well that they do, you're not new to the English
language.

> I was unaware that Mr Lipman had chosen to 'quit' of his own volition.

You can't use that excuse more than once,

> Maybe he will now explain *why* he chose to leave such a flourishing company
> if he really was a key player. Being truthful will help.

Nobody owes you any explanations.

>> Are you attempting to imply something, or just willing to let others infer
>> wrongly that these researchers were sub-standard?
>
> Folk have to judge for themselves.

Since you have refused to be explicit in your intent above, it appears
that you knew you were skewing the truth. You see, being truthful
would help you as well, but you have refused to be truthful here.

Folk have to judge for themselves about your intent here too, and now
I'm sure they can see that you are a dishonest person. I believe that
you don't want to be seen as dishonest, only manipulative.

>> You definitely deserve a visit if it is either the former or the latter. Why
>> not just dispense with the slimy innuendo now that your targets have
>> shown you that they know where you live. You're just begging for some
>> anonymous foul play with real life consequences.
>
> My only *target* has been Foldes and his cronies at Aumha. If I have to suffer
> 'consequences' in real life to bring out the truth, then so be it.

You should not load your questions with innuendo meant to hurt the
reputations of others. It puts you in a bad light.

> Suitable documentation will survive to help track down any miscreants.

The problem with that is that you will have so much documentation about
so many people that you have intentionally upset, that the authorities will
have too many suspects and nothing to help them winnow them down to
an actual perpetrator. You are muddying up the waters to your own detriment.

[~BD~]

FromTheRafters wrote:
> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
> news:5didnWilcfsaGLnTnZ2dnUVZ8kSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
>>> news:PoidnfeG-9338rnTnZ2dnUVZ8rGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
>>>> They must both be disappointed, though, that the 'company' dispensed with
>>>> their services before Malwarebytes became *really* successful.
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea why they were dismissed though.
>>>
>>> Are you claiming that they were "dismissed" or "dispensed with"?
>>>
>>> If so, please cite some sort of reference for me to investigate.
>>
>> I am not claiming anything. Neither person is now employed by Malwarebytes. I
>> do not know why; it is none of my business, is it?
>
> No, it isn't.

However, the business of Malwarebytes *is* my business - it is in the
public domain. You should read here:

http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index...howtopic=21804

If you follow a link in the response, you will find a comment by me.

I'm *still* trying to get to the truth. It is that simple.

>> Why would *you* want to investigate? It's none of *your* business either - is
>> it?
>
> I want to believe that you tell the truth, but it is very hard to do so when
> you phrase your questions in such an accusing way. It would be like me
> asking you why you let your son die without lifting a finger to help him. It's
> not lying, but it's not being truthful either.

*I* would give you a truthful and straight-forward answer.

Folk who have nothing to hide invariably answer in a similar manner.
*You* do (I hope! <grin>). I *do* tell you the truth - always.

>>> I somebody quits, I can see it being called "let go" but not "dismissed"
>>> or "dispensed with" because those two terms have a definite negative
>>> connotation.
>>
>> Do they?
>
> You know damned well that they do, you're not new to the English
> language.
>
>> I was unaware that Mr Lipman had chosen to 'quit' of his own volition.
>
> You can't use that excuse more than once,

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com>
>
>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>
>>> Please note: Since BD was kicked off the Malwarebytes' forum for
posting improper, sexually oriented, graphics he seeks out to besmirch
Malwarebytes whenever, wherever, possible.

>> Ah!

>> Do you know, David - I thought it was because I had the gall to
suggest that the programme might well eradicate all manner of malware -
but might possibly (just *possibly*) insert either a Trojan or a 'back
door' onto the otherwise cleaned computer.

>> David - tell folk here *why* you were dismissed from employment by
Malwarebytes. I'm sure readers would like to know.

> Look you piece of ****, I was not dismissed. I resigned. It was my
decision, my choice and for my reasons.

> Gee, so much for that statement that you "never lie". You just did -
twice.

It would be sooooo much more straight-forward if you simply told the
truth and gave a brief explanation regarding your choice and reasons.

Folk usually abandon a sinking ship - not a company flying high.

Why cannot you see that?

Btw - I didn't lie at all - I simply asked you a question. I obviously
touched a nerve - yet again. Sorry 'bout that!

Ref: Message-ID: <3u2dnbTS8vN5HLnTnZ2dnUVZ8sadnZ2d@bt.com>


>> Maybe he will now explain *why* he chose to leave such a flourishing company
>> if he really was a key player. Being truthful will help.
>
> Nobody owes you any explanations.

*
I expect Rupert Murdoch thought that way too.
*

No satisfactory explanation ALWAYS leads to more questions!


>>> Are you attempting to imply something, or just willing to let others infer
>>> wrongly that these researchers were sub-standard?
>>
>> Folk have to judge for themselves.
>
> Since you have refused to be explicit in your intent above, it appears
> that you knew you were skewing the truth. You see, being truthful
> would help you as well, but you have refused to be truthful here.
>
> Folk have to judge for themselves about your intent here too, and now
> I'm sure they can see that you are a dishonest person. I believe that
> you don't want to be seen as dishonest, only manipulative.

Let's be quite clear. I *am* manipulative. I'm good at it.

BUT - I *do* tell the truth.

>>> You definitely deserve a visit if it is either the former or the latter. Why
>>> not just dispense with the slimy innuendo now that your targets have
>>> shown you that they know where you live. You're just begging for some
>>> anonymous foul play with real life consequences.
>>
>> My only *target* has been Foldes and his cronies at Aumha. If I have to suffer
>> 'consequences' in real life to bring out the truth, then so be it.
>
> You should not load your questions with innuendo meant to hurt the
> reputations of others. It puts you in a bad light.

Your advice is welcomed and noted, FTR.

Nobody who has been straight-forward and honest with me has ever had to
suffer sustained questioning. I most certainly have no intention of
damaging the reputation of honest folk - but it's difficult to know who
they are sometimes.

>> Suitable documentation will survive to help track down any miscreants.
>
> The problem with that is that you will have so much documentation about
> so many people that you have intentionally upset, that the authorities will
> have too many suspects and nothing to help them winnow them down to
> an actual perpetrator. You are muddying up the waters to your own detriment.

Then I will have to deal with any 'visitors' myself - or /try/ to! ;-)

Your point *is* taken though. I'll consider how best to narrow the
search should it become necessary. Hmmm. <how best to do that>?

HTH

HAND

D.

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:55:33 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> I am simply seeking the truth.

By lying, ****.

You've been told numerous times by both parties that they departed on
good terms and of their own volition from Malwarebytes, and yet you still
attempt to besmirch their characters by lying about them.



--
“Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, and socialism
without freedom is slavery and brutality.� -Mikhail Bakunin

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:31:30 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:

> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
> news:PoidnfeG-9338rnTnZ2dnUVZ8rGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ToKdnXPsv-I42bnTnZ2dnUVZ7r-dnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>> “The point is we can protect the internet community as a whole by
>>>> stopping malware from being distributed to millions of people,”
>>>> Kleczynski said.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No mention of the work done by Dustin Cook and David Lipman though!
>>>> :-(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Typical Trolling post. It would not have been have you not added the
>>> line above. WTF are you riding that stupid ignorant thoughts. Looks
>>> like you are accusing Cook and Lipmann of lying . What an idiot you
>>> are
>>
>>
>> Lying?
>>
>> Not at all.
>>
>> They must both be disappointed, though, that the 'company' dispensed
>> with their services before Malwarebytes became *really* successful.
>>
>> I have no idea why they were dismissed though.
>
> Are you claiming that they were "dismissed" or "dispensed with"?
>
> If so, please cite some sort of reference for me to investigate.
>
> I somebody quits, I can see it being called "let go" but not "dismissed"
> or "dispensed with" because those two terms have a definite negative
> connotation.
>
> Are you attempting to imply something, or just willing to let others
> infer wrongly that these researchers were sub-standard?
>
> You definitely deserve a visit if it is either the former or the latter.
> Why not just dispense with the slimy innuendo now that your targets have
> shown you that they know where you live. You're just begging for some
> anonymous foul play with real life consequences.

IAWTP.



--
“Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, and socialism
without freedom is slavery and brutality.� -Mikhail Bakunin

[Bullwinkle.]

There you go again.

Perhaps if you would learn to support your family
you would feel better and developed a better vocabulary.


"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:j044fp$jjk$5@dont-email.me...
By lying, ****.

[Bullwinkle.]

Of course you do, fits a mooching Socialist.


"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:j044in$jjk$6@dont-email.me...

IAWTP.