"Jenn" <nope@nowayatno.howanyday> wrote in
news:iv5ef0$kla$1@dont-email.me:

> Is it possible for a malware cleaner program to put it's own
> 'root-kit' hidden somewhere and then say the system is clean?

Sure, but then, that malware cleaner wouldn't last very long. It's
subject to constant peer review and 3rd party independent analysis.

> I don't know what a root-kit is

I'm not surprised.

> thread off and on. Why get insulted that someone wants to put
> Malwarebytes to the ultimate analysis? If nothing is wrong and it
> isn't doing anything wrong, then the question should just be
> answered with a, "NO ... Malwarebytes doesn't do that and here is
> the proof".......

I'm not insulted that someone wanted to put malwarebytes to some sort
of test; As I said, it's already been peer reviewed, and is constantly
under scrutiny; as all apps of it's nature are.

If something was amiss, they wouldn't be able to hide it for very long.
I already answered BD's question and my proof was that I disassembled
the executable. BD in his slimey fashion won't accept the proof.

> it, but I'm not into analyzing malware and such things either. It's
> a business... aren't they used to being put to the test?

They always are, Jenn. They aren't malicious and you only display more
astounding ignorance carrying on like this. Computers seem to be
magical to you and BD.. I just don't get that.


--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over