On 06/07/2011 19:40, Aardvark wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:46:47 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> On 06/07/2011 18:33, G. Morgan wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>> On the other hand, you
>>>> could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would definitely
>>>> IMO (IANAL) have a much stronger case against him. There's a strong
>>>> possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs has lost them money.
>>>
>>> How could that possibly be proven?
>>>
>>> Giggity
>>>
>>>
>> Especially as it is a *free* facility!
>>
>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free
>
> So why is there a big ****ing green button on their main page with the
> words: 'Buy Now - Just $24.95'?

Coersion?

> Your slimy innuendo and insinuation could easily have cost them money. It
> also might have caused someone to have their machine still infected
> because they took your sliminess, innuendo and insinuation as gospel and
> *not* used MBAM, either bought or free, for fear that it might further
> infect their system.
>
> A nice ****ing double whammy for BD.
>

You, of course, don't have to worry, do you? (being a non-Windows,
Linux, fellow!)

How many computer users do you think monitor these newsgroups before
finding the Malwarebytes URLs? Next to zero, I suspect!

D.