Ping: Dustin Cook - How would *you* find this rootkit?

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:08:39 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in news:iusqf9$c77$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>
>>> [groups trimmed]
>>>> Being as the original cds are still very much in the possesion of the
>>>> owners I borrowed them from, how and on what possible planet could
>>>> you get the idea I stole them? The owners *still* have them.
>>>
>>> Did you copy the music from the owners' CDs? If so, you may need to
>>> read up on copyright laws.
>>>
>>>
>> I believe Dustin Cook to be a founding partner of Pirate Bay.
>> http://thepiratebay.org/
>>
>> He knows full well that what they do is illegal, but they do it anyway!
>
>
> Hi all.
>
> I wonder what my legal options are now that he's done with the inneundo
> and outright accused me of being directly involved with a very large and
> very well known website.

Your legal position in this case would be, IMO (IANAL), pretty shaky at
best. He has very carefully avoided making any outright accusations (as
is his habit and wont), instead stating a belief. Add to that his
provable total lack of credibility, and any court in any land would tell
you to **** off and stop wasting their time, although not in such blunt
language.

> That's a very large accusation.

Nope. Just typical BD innuendo.

> Suggestions
> from the audience are welcome... Should I use the real life information
> I have on him and pursue legal action?

There may very well come a time when you may be able to do this. My
advice is to hold on to the info until such time. On the other hand, you
could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would definitely IMO
(IANAL) have a much stronger case against him. There's a strong
possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs has lost them money.

Use what ammunition you have to its best advantage.

There are more ways than one to skin a cat, y'know.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.�

[~BD~]

On 06/07/2011 18:33, G. Morgan wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, you
>> could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would definitely IMO
>> (IANAL) have a much stronger case against him. There's a strong
>> possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs has lost them money.
>
> How could that possibly be proven?
>
> Giggity
>

Especially as it is a *free* facility!

http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free

[SeaNymph]

"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:iv254v$j3s$2@dont-email.me...
> On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:08:39 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>
>>
>
>
>> Suggestions
>> from the audience are welcome... Should I use the real life information
>> I have on him and pursue legal action?
>
> There may very well come a time when you may be able to do this. My
> advice is to hold on to the info until such time. On the other hand, you
> could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would definitely IMO
> (IANAL) have a much stronger case against him. There's a strong
> possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs has lost them money.
>
> Use what ammunition you have to its best advantage.
>
> There are more ways than one to skin a cat, y'know.
>
Excellent advice. I think the indirect approach is much more viable, and
probably infinitely more entertaining <g>

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:46:47 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> On 06/07/2011 18:33, G. Morgan wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>> On the other hand, you
>>> could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would definitely
>>> IMO (IANAL) have a much stronger case against him. There's a strong
>>> possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs has lost them money.
>>
>> How could that possibly be proven?
>>
>> Giggity
>>
>>
> Especially as it is a *free* facility!
>
> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free

So why is there a big ****ing green button on their main page with the
words: 'Buy Now - Just $24.95'?

Your slimy innuendo and insinuation could easily have cost them money. It
also might have caused someone to have their machine still infected
because they took your sliminess, innuendo and insinuation as gospel and
*not* used MBAM, either bought or free, for fear that it might further
infect their system.

A nice ****ing double whammy for BD.

--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.�

[~BD~]

On 06/07/2011 19:40, Aardvark wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:46:47 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> On 06/07/2011 18:33, G. Morgan wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>> On the other hand, you
>>>> could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would definitely
>>>> IMO (IANAL) have a much stronger case against him. There's a strong
>>>> possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs has lost them money.
>>>
>>> How could that possibly be proven?
>>>
>>> Giggity
>>>
>>>
>> Especially as it is a *free* facility!
>>
>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free
>
> So why is there a big ****ing green button on their main page with the
> words: 'Buy Now - Just $24.95'?

Coersion?

> Your slimy innuendo and insinuation could easily have cost them money. It
> also might have caused someone to have their machine still infected
> because they took your sliminess, innuendo and insinuation as gospel and
> *not* used MBAM, either bought or free, for fear that it might further
> infect their system.
>
> A nice ****ing double whammy for BD.
>

You, of course, don't have to worry, do you? (being a non-Windows,
Linux, fellow!)

How many computer users do you think monitor these newsgroups before
finding the Malwarebytes URLs? Next to zero, I suspect!

D.

[Nobody > (Revisited)]

On 7/6/2011 10:58 AM, SeaNymph wrote:
> "Aardvark"<aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
> news:iv254v$j3s$2@dont-email.me...
>> On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:08:39 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Suggestions
>>> from the audience are welcome... Should I use the real life information
>>> I have on him and pursue legal action?
>>
>> There may very well come a time when you may be able to do this. My
>> advice is to hold on to the info until such time. On the other hand, you
>> could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would definitely IMO
>> (IANAL) have a much stronger case against him. There's a strong
>> possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs has lost them money.
>>
>> Use what ammunition you have to its best advantage.
>>
>> There are more ways than one to skin a cat, y'know.
>>
> Excellent advice. I think the indirect approach is much more viable, and
> probably infinitely more entertaining<g>
>
>

Yah know, the old "follow up every ~BD~ poast with a personalized ~BD~
FAQ (with cites) by more than one person would stifle his ass fairly
well. He might consider it "cyberstalking", but what could he do? The
"Clean Hands" principle would shoot his ass out of the water.


--
"**** this is it, all the pieces do fit.
We're like that crazy old man jumping
out of the alleyway with a baseball bat,
saying, "Remember me mother****er?"
Jim “Dandy” Mangrum

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

James Egan wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:45:22 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote:
>
>> Dustin is full of bluster, but he's not the total dirtbag you're
>> making him out to be. For that, you need to look to BD. With Dustin,
>> what you see is what you get--he's not a sneak, even when he isn't
>> doing quite the right thing. Note that not doing quite the right
>> thing is not quite the same as doing something outright wrong.
>
> You'll be asking raidy for a date next. lol.

And another country heard from.

How have you been?

[Bullwinkle.]

You may want to email them and ask.

Might be too late...LOL


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:iv273n$1ih$2@dont-email.me...
On 06/07/2011 18:33, G. Morgan wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, you
>> could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would definitely IMO
>> (IANAL) have a much stronger case against him. There's a strong
>> possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs has lost them money.
>
> How could that possibly be proven?
>
> Giggity
>

Especially as it is a *free* facility!

http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free

[Jim Willemenz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <813Rp.18773$LG7.10186@newsfe01.iad>
"Nobody > (Revisited)" <usenetharvested@aol.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/6/2011 10:58 AM, SeaNymph wrote:

> > Excellent advice. I think the indirect approach is much more viable, and
> > probably infinitely more entertaining<g>
> >
> >
>
> Yah know, the old "follow up every ~BD~ poast with a personalized ~BD~
> FAQ (with cites) by more than one person would stifle his ass fairly
> well. He might consider it "cyberstalking", but what could he do? The
> "Clean Hands" principle would shoot his ass out of the water.

I can do that.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOFMsPAAoJENNVkNCLrP2bWHkP/01zNWVVqoYeV/O1S/b5ihzJ
Ngce0pVTXTfT5KGj0//gklEkIi1sgCmWqgM83KH6b4YLNybEDvzu4WHvkBMHh2TH
RmQfzicFdbOVgnDjv+Jwk7en3vOCj7Eigde25fSBrbBUNA6gD9 RJfOubzhtQV7dp
Pww045yjtuKjYJcuT6jZqGw/1JeaYV7MJIdXCYg07ZK4mfX5d2gzfFbaOGAIWWap
9mDS1U5bz354lfy1PvBhvyhr5Cd1eluo537Fn13tplj13EkWl9 LxgPYOdu0dGqWh
j7APi/JEWgAMNhvfjRW8gxt2JU5S7iQz3ySrsyNg621R4moGfUfhoEQx aE/ORLUg
kNTGN/RrYXuQJVNtn/F+BeyR0weLYTvTGhALrg4BPUVWy01uCUiK4YaaeQwPy59n
2fhD43/58W88SFYHSYFN27fiAF6jtapyp+frfkNXXd4Hf9p2D9TwEqbua 3J88rSN
68zfBkIyxPqeFUgAB3/rr1WsoooPoiFHtf/msb3eP7WWIC4OQWmQ9mKz6RU9jQUz
TamxyuQFi39n9MHdaUeJfyOttZnnQNj/faETlQNkNs12teB7fGEJWraRu2rX0M7i
jqPkLHQJgQ0zUzNnphgFhdrAmvYCG8dVB+FR0wQmoGy0zWRTD8 u0bnAqvpDqphQh
NAeqccvX7KUB6UhZV3cU
=rQB0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--

In an amazing display of insensitivity, wannabe woman beater David Brooks
asks a random lady in MID <dICdnSmKnNQlaHPRnZ2dnUVZ7sOdnZ2d@bt.com>:

"Can you describe how it felt to have your breast(s) removed, SeaNympph?"

Low-life scum David Brooks continues his abuse
in MID <Zc2dnfB8oNwdoxbQnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@bt.com>:

"You mentioned that you are a cancer 'survivor'. After your treatment,
were you left with both breasts, one breast or simply none at all?"

[Dustin]

"Nobody > (Revisited)" <usenetharvested@aol.com> wrote in
news:813Rp.18773$LG7.10186@newsfe01.iad:

> On 7/6/2011 10:58 AM, SeaNymph wrote:
>> "Aardvark"<aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>> news:iv254v$j3s$2@dont-email.me...
>>> On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:08:39 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Suggestions
>>>> from the audience are welcome... Should I use the real life
>>>> information I have on him and pursue legal action?
>>>
>>> There may very well come a time when you may be able to do this.
>>> My advice is to hold on to the info until such time. On the other
>>> hand, you could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would
>>> definitely IMO (IANAL) have a much stronger case against him.
>>> There's a strong possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs
>>> has lost them money.
>>>
>>> Use what ammunition you have to its best advantage.
>>>
>>> There are more ways than one to skin a cat, y'know.
>>>
>> Excellent advice. I think the indirect approach is much more
>> viable, and probably infinitely more entertaining<g>
>>
>>
>
> Yah know, the old "follow up every ~BD~ poast with a personalized
> ~BD~ FAQ (with cites) by more than one person would stifle his ass
> fairly well. He might consider it "cyberstalking", but what could he
> do? The "Clean Hands" principle would shoot his ass out of the
> water.

Pcbutts.txt faq style?


--
(Hey) I keep on thinking that it's
(Hey) all done and all over now (whoa)
You keep on thinking you can save me save me
(Hey) My ship is sinking but it's
(Hey) all good and I can go down (whoa)
You've got me thinking that the party's all over