On 7/6/2011 3:18 PM, Dustin wrote:
> "Nobody> (Revisited)"<usenetharvested@aol.com> wrote in
> news:813Rp.18773$LG7.10186@newsfe01.iad:
>
>> On 7/6/2011 10:58 AM, SeaNymph wrote:
>>> "Aardvark"<aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>>> news:iv254v$j3s$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:08:39 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Suggestions
>>>>> from the audience are welcome... Should I use the real life
>>>>> information I have on him and pursue legal action?
>>>>
>>>> There may very well come a time when you may be able to do this.
>>>> My advice is to hold on to the info until such time. On the other
>>>> hand, you could always pass the info on to Malwarebytes, who would
>>>> definitely IMO (IANAL) have a much stronger case against him.
>>>> There's a strong possibility his slimy insinuations in various NGs
>>>> has lost them money.
>>>>
>>>> Use what ammunition you have to its best advantage.
>>>>
>>>> There are more ways than one to skin a cat, y'know.
>>>>
>>> Excellent advice. I think the indirect approach is much more
>>> viable, and probably infinitely more entertaining<g>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yah know, the old "follow up every ~BD~ poast with a personalized
>> ~BD~ FAQ (with cites) by more than one person would stifle his ass
>> fairly well. He might consider it "cyberstalking", but what could he
>> do? The "Clean Hands" principle would shoot his ass out of the
>> water.
>
> Pcbutts.txt faq style?
>
Eggzactly!
--
"**** this is it, all the pieces do fit.
We're like that crazy old man jumping
out of the alleyway with a baseball bat,
saying, "Remember me mother****er?"
Jim “Dandy” Mangrum


Reply With Quote
)
16 +0100, ~BD~ wrote: