I'm stuck - Windows Stable Work

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:41:47 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:13:33 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> BD did *not* /make fun/ of your illness.
>>
>> ****ing liar.
>>
>> <Zc2dnfB8oNwdoxbQnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@bt.com>
>>
>> <dICdnSmKnNQlaHPRnZ2dnUVZ7sOdnZ2d@bt.com>
>
> Crap!
>
> Neither of those posts was /making fun/ of her illness.

****ing liar.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[SeaNymph]

"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jiFOp.16410$fQ4.9925@newsfe16.ams2...
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:19:10 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>
>> SeaNymph wrote:
>>
>>>If he's suffered the loss of a child, then I'm sorry for that. But,
>>>being the liar and hateful person he is, I don't know what the truth is.
>>
>> Shame on you then. Are you a Holocaust denier too?
>
> WTF?????
>
> Now *that* was some leap of logic you made there, mate.

The word "logic" has nothing to do with his post. Seriously though, how
much does this post, and several others he's supposedly made recently,
remind you of Jenn?

[G. Morgan]

SeaNymph wrote:

>
>"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>news:jiFOp.16410$fQ4.9925@newsfe16.ams2...
>> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:19:10 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> SeaNymph wrote:
>>>
>>>>If he's suffered the loss of a child, then I'm sorry for that. But,
>>>>being the liar and hateful person he is, I don't know what the truth is.
>>>
>>> Shame on you then. Are you a Holocaust denier too?
>>
>> WTF?????
>>
>> Now *that* was some leap of logic you made there, mate.
>
>The word "logic" has nothing to do with his post.

I used as much logic as you do, like when you engage Jenn.

It would seem to me your best course of action is to plonk Jenn, since
she bothers you so much. All your 'arguments' and her 'viewpoints' have
proven to be incompatible. Any effort to have a nice 'discussion' is
met with failure. Watching you two go back and forth is nothing but a
well illustrated exercise of futility.


>Seriously though, how
>much does this post, and several others he's supposedly made recently,
>remind you of Jenn?

Does that irritate you? You can plonk me too, instead of *****ing and
whining.

[SeaNymph]

"G. Morgan" <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in message
news9km07lr11a3ekkldh4se7jmp0nan3ai40@Osama-is-dead.net...
> SeaNymph wrote:
>
>>
>>"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>>news:jiFOp.16410$fQ4.9925@newsfe16.ams2...
>>> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:19:10 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>>>
>>>> SeaNymph wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>If he's suffered the loss of a child, then I'm sorry for that. But,
>>>>>being the liar and hateful person he is, I don't know what the truth
>>>>>is.
>>>>
>>>> Shame on you then. Are you a Holocaust denier too?
>>>
>>> WTF?????
>>>
>>> Now *that* was some leap of logic you made there, mate.
>>
>>The word "logic" has nothing to do with his post.
>
> I used as much logic as you do, like when you engage Jenn.

That's not true. I often provide reasonable, civil discussion, right up to
the point that she starts acting like a child.

>
> It would seem to me your best course of action is to plonk Jenn, since
> she bothers you so much. All your 'arguments' and her 'viewpoints' have
> proven to be incompatible. Any effort to have a nice 'discussion' is
> met with failure. Watching you two go back and forth is nothing but a
> well illustrated exercise of futility.

And what does this have to do with anything? What sort of a tangent have
you wandered off onto? If you don't like my posts, don't read them.
>
>
>>Seriously though, how
>>much does this post, and several others he's supposedly made recently,
>>remind you of Jenn?
>
> Does that irritate you? You can plonk me too, instead of *****ing and
> whining.

You become more laughable by the day. Your posts don't address the issues,
you're stuck on Jenn and not much you post makes any sense. Whining and
*****ing? Pointing out the obvious is neither of those things. Why do you
ignore the whining, *****ing and cry baby antics from Jenn? Why you have
elected yourself lord protector of those incapable of supporting their own
statements? Don't bother, it's a rhetorical question, and I'm pretty sure I
know the answer <g>

>

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:41:37 -0400, SeaNymph wrote:

> G. Morgan wrote:

>> I used as much logic as you do, like when you engage Jenn.
>
> That's not true. I often provide reasonable, civil discussion, right up
> to the point that she starts acting like a child.

And usually for some time thereafter.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:57:39 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>
>>> Why not report him on suspicion of illegal possession of a banned
>>> firearm? After all, a crime is a crime.
>>
>> I don't know what he has in his possession, nor do I care.
>>
>
> I doubt if he's seen or handled a small-arm of any sort since his pilot
> days. Or, if he's seen one or more, he certainly hasn't handled it.


You are quite wrong about that, Aardvark! :-)

[Peter Foldes]

"Li'l Abner" <blvstk@dogpatch.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9F12D11FA4B42butter@wefb973cbe498...
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:iudiob$7i1$1@speranza.aioe.org:

> Actually, I am the one that started this thread and it was on topic
> at the time. So if you guys decided to take it off topic, then you should
> have started a new thread in the first place.
> Not that I care. I like to watch little kids just being themselves.


Li'l Abner

You are absolutely correct and I tried to re-direct their stupid conversation to the
other group where it belongs.
You can see the stupidity of these people and thanks for your understanding


^%$(*&()=24%

[Peter Foldes]

"G. Morgan" <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in message
news:8u6l07lgb94o2u14d0l4s01vvmmdplqfta@Osama-is-dead.net...
> Aardvark wrote:
>
>>Necessary cross-posting reinstated.
>
> +1



Both of you are (Aardvark and you Morgan ) clueless when it comes to posting what
the subject and name of the group say's. Both of you are like little children at
times.

^%$(*&()=24

[Bullwinkle.]

"By their fruits ye shall know them."


"G. Morgan" <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in message
news9km07lr11a3ekkldh4se7jmp0nan3ai40@Osama-is-dead.net...
I used as much logic as you do,

[Bullwinkle.]

They both need mums support to exist, even put food on the table.


"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iufrr0$ala$1@speranza.aioe.org...

"G. Morgan" <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in message
news:8u6l07lgb94o2u14d0l4s01vvmmdplqfta@Osama-is-dead.net...
> Aardvark wrote:
>
>>Necessary cross-posting reinstated.
>
> +1



Both of you are (Aardvark and you Morgan ) clueless when it comes to posting
what
the subject and name of the group say's. Both of you are like little
children at
times.

^%$(*&()=24