For all the SAS users out there, this might be of interest to you.
As many of you have noticed with me over the years, I don't like
preamble - thus - the thread below:
<http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=301468>
Silj
--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:34:31 -0400, "siljaline" <spam@uce.gov> wrote:
>For all the SAS users out there, this might be of interest to you.
>As many of you have noticed with me over the years, I don't like
>preamble - thus - the thread below:
><http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=301468>
>
>Silj
I've finally given up on my paid version of SAS. It is such a system
hog! After installing CleanMem, I saw that SAS was using hundreds of
megabytes of the "commit total," and that the number was constantly
increasing. After disabling SAS I find that my system is much more
responsive, and without the total halts of programs that would occur
periodically whenever SAS was updating.
Maybe support.com can provide some support on this <grin>.
-dan z-
Protect your civil rights!
Let the politicians know how you feel.
Join or donate to the NRA today!
http://membership.nrahq.org/default....ignid=XR014887
The true measure of a people's freedom is whether they are armed or not. - Aristotle
http://www.davekopel.com/2a/Foreign/...the-greeks.htm
slate_leeper wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:34:31 -0400, "siljaline"<spam@uce.gov> wrote:
>
>> For all the SAS users out there, this might be of interest to you.
>> As many of you have noticed with me over the years, I don't like
>> preamble - thus - the thread below:
>> <http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=301468>
>>
>> Silj
>
>
> I've finally given up on my paid version of SAS. It is such a system
> hog! After installing CleanMem, I saw that SAS was using hundreds of
> megabytes of the "commit total," and that the number was constantly
> increasing. After disabling SAS I find that my system is much more
> responsive, and without the total halts of programs that would occur
> periodically whenever SAS was updating.
>
> Maybe support.com can provide some support on this<grin>.
>
>
> -dan z-
Silj *was* a VSOP.
http://web.archive.org/web/200902010...a.org/vsop.htm
He must know his stuff - so why has he been sacked? Hmmm!
(he's no longer mentioned here: http://aumha.org/vsop.htm)
You, 'dan z' obviously feel the software fails to meet your requirements
nowadays.
Maybe there's more to matters than first meets the eye! ;-)
Dave
~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in news:itfeps$7nk$1@dont-email.me:
> slate_leeper wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:34:31 -0400, "siljaline"<spam@uce.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> For all the SAS users out there, this might be of interest to you.
>>> As many of you have noticed with me over the years, I don't like
>>> preamble - thus - the thread below:
>>> <http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=301468>
>>>
>>> Silj
>>
>>
>> I've finally given up on my paid version of SAS. It is such a system
>> hog! After installing CleanMem, I saw that SAS was using hundreds of
>> megabytes of the "commit total," and that the number was constantly
>> increasing. After disabling SAS I find that my system is much more
>> responsive, and without the total halts of programs that would occur
>> periodically whenever SAS was updating.
>>
>> Maybe support.com can provide some support on this<grin>.
>>
>>
>> -dan z-
>
>
> Silj *was* a VSOP.
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/200902010...a.org/vsop.htm
>
> He must know his stuff - so why has he been sacked? Hmmm!
> (he's no longer mentioned here: http://aumha.org/vsop.htm)
>
> You, 'dan z' obviously feel the software fails to meet your
> requirements nowadays.
>
> Maybe there's more to matters than first meets the eye! ;-)
>
> Dave
In spite of posters like ~BD~ I still lurk here, and post occasionally.
But it is getting difficult to separate BD crap from the good stuff.
Silj, don't worry - I know who the good guy is ...
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Han wrote:
> In spite of posters like ~BD~ I still lurk here, and post
> occasionally. But it is getting difficult to separate BD crap from
> the good stuff.
That's very true. ~BD~ claims to 'tell the truth' but all he does is
spread malicious and slimy innuendos about good people (or good
software). He claims to be looking for 'bad guys' but since he does not
have the intelligence to actually find them, he attempts to make them up
by writing disparaging remarks about others.
He is a sad case indeed.
--
-bts
-"slime: -n Person from UK who has a boat"
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> That's very true. ~BD~ claims to 'tell the truth'
BD *does* tell the truth!
> but all he does is
> spread malicious and slimy innuendos about good people (or good
> software).
Cite an instance of when BD has maligned good people or software.
BD has asked questions - which have not been answered!
> He claims to be looking for 'bad guys' but since he does not
> have the intelligence to actually find them, he attempts to make them up
> by writing disparaging remarks about others.
Cite a reference regarding BD making a disparaging remark about 'others'.
> He is a sad case indeed.
BD is a very happy chap! :-)
Tell the folks why you were SACKED in the Navy.
While you are at it tell them why you got SACKED from AOL.
We could ask for more times you were SACKED but thought
we would leave the odd ball sex stuff out of it.
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:itfeps$7nk$1@dont-email.me...
He must know his stuff - so why has he been sacked?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/17/2011 02:34 AM, siljaline wrote:
> For all the SAS users out there, this might be of interest to you.
> As many of you have noticed with me over the years, I don't like
> preamble - thus - the thread below:
> <http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=301468>
>
> Silj
>
>
I am glad to hear that Nick is doing well. I remember when he first
posted here about his new software.
- --
Max Wachtel
Registered Linux User #393236
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk38D2wACgkQqjmhlpTkKUwiQwCeKDGJoReuq7 NXPIy5dhF9nqm9
M4AAn0i6uhb2DlqFanrySvHTyohUOV34
=lUaT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Max Wachtel <maxpro4u@hotmail.com> wrote in news:ith31e$oa2$1
@news.albasani.net:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/17/2011 02:34 AM, siljaline wrote:
>> For all the SAS users out there, this might be of interest to you.
>> As many of you have noticed with me over the years, I don't like
>> preamble - thus - the thread below:
>> <http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=301468>
>>
>> Silj
>>
>>
> I am glad to hear that Nick is doing well. I remember when he first
> posted here about his new software.
Yeah, I remember that too. He tactfully bowed out when the trolls tried to
stir him up. And maintained his credibility by doing so.
--
--- Everybody has a right to my opinion. ---
From: "Max Wachtel" <maxpro4u@hotmail.com>
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/17/2011 02:34 AM, siljaline wrote:
>> For all the SAS users out there, this might be of interest to you.
>> As many of you have noticed with me over the years, I don't like
>> preamble - thus - the thread below:
>> <http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=301468>
>>
>> Silj
>>
> I am glad to hear that Nick is doing well. I remember when he first
> posted here about his new software.
Yeah... it was borderline spam :-)
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote