Computer security tales of woe: =?windows-1252?Q?What=92s_your?==?windows-1252?Q?s=3F?=

[~BD~]

Quote:
*****

I recently received two email messages from people who had been the
victims of cybercrime. These people weren’t just readers of our
blog—they work on our team. That means that they spend almost every day
thinking about viruses, online fraud, security updates, and other issues
of computer security.

And they still weren’t immune to the threat.

I got permission to share these stories in an effort to prove that
cybercriminals are so tricky that they can even fool people who should
know better.

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/securitytips...t-s-yours.aspx

[Bullwinkle.]

Watching you type out lies everyday.

That is a Crime.


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:itb2cd$ubn$1@dont-email.me...

[Bullwinkle.]

Davey boy, you claim to be part of MI5, so
you going after these guy? Or are you just all bull****, still.
------------------------------------------------

The anarchist hackers of the world are uniting.

In a statement released over the weekend, rogue hacker group LulzSec --
which in recent weeks has defaced and disabled sites from Sony to the CIA --
has pledged to unite with its sister collective Anonymous in a new
cybercampaign against the world’s governments.

Codenamed Operation Anti-Security, the statement was widely propagated by
the two organizations on their official Twitter feeds.

The two underground hacker collectives promised to target any government
websites or systems that got in their way.

“Welcome to Operation Anti-Security,” the note read. “We encourage any
vessel, large or small, to open fire on any government or agency that
crosses their path. We fully endorse the flaunting of the word 'AntiSec' on
any government website defacement or physical graffiti art.”


The groups are now looking to pick up any would-be allies as well. “To
increase efforts, we are now teaming up with the Anonymous collective and
all affiliated battleships,” the statement read.

The group doesn’t shy away from making its objective and its target crystal
clear, stating that its “Lulz Lizard battle fleet is now declaring immediate
and unremitting war on the freedom-snatching moderators of 2011,” alluding
to the major governments attempting to regulate the Internet.

“Top priority is to steal and leak any classified government information,
including email spools and documentation. Prime targets are banks and other
high-ranking establishments.”

This new hacker campaign announcement comes just as the U.S. has reported
potential plans to increase maximum sentencing for cyberterrorists. If the
new laws are passed, hackers caught breaking into government systems could
face 20 years behind bars.

LulzSec recently broke into mainstream consciousness after a string of
attacks on governments and companies alike. The outfit emphasizes that it
does not hack for financial profit and its main motivation is simply “to
have fun by causing mayhem.”

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:itb2cd$ubn$1@dont-email.me:

> Quote:
> *****
>
> I recently received two email messages from people who had been the
> victims of cybercrime. These people weren’t just readers of our

I was almost a victim of cybercrime. Had you been provided the correct
streetaddress.



--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:

> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.

Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.

I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!

The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still do!

Dave

[Bullwinkle.]

Your were not. That is another lie!


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me...
Dustin wrote:

> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.

Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.

I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!

The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still do!

Dave

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
>
> Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.

No. Amazingly enough, those who could have caused me problems didn't
do so. Riled me a bit, but Rl they didn't go for. You OTH took the
information provided by the remailer and ran with it. It's
inexcusable.

> I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!

Which boggles the mind why you'd go out of your way to intentionally
try and cause RL problems for another...My opinion is simply, you
aren't the good guy you're trying to portray yourself as.

> The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still
> do!

Not necessarily...Credit card fraud (based on a description you
provided once before) doesn't always imply they had anything on you.

As I'm sure you'd be curious and would appreciate me elaborating on
that, I won't.


--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>
>>> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
>>
>> Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
>
> No. Amazingly enough, those who could have caused me problems didn't
> do so. Riled me a bit, but Rl they didn't go for. You OTH took the
> information provided by the remailer and ran with it. It's
> inexcusable.
>
>> I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
>
> Which boggles the mind why you'd go out of your way to intentionally
> try and cause RL problems for another...My opinion is simply, you
> aren't the good guy you're trying to portray yourself as.
>
>> The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still
>> do!
>
> Not necessarily...Credit card fraud (based on a description you
> provided once before) doesn't always imply they had anything on you.
>
> As I'm sure you'd be curious and would appreciate me elaborating on
> that, I won't.

Here's a thread from wa ...ay back, Dustin!
http://discussions.virtualdr.com/sho...d.php?t=196043

"I have recently had funds repaid to me by PayPal after a fraudulent
withdrawal from my Credit Card account. The matter is now also in the
hands of our Police; I reported the matter when I started to receive
*emails* from [Email link removed by moderator] demanding that "lost"
funds (reclaimed from them by PayPal) be paid directly to themselves.
The writer knew not only where I live - but who lives here with me, the
name of my next door neighbour, when I bought my cottage and how much I
paid for it! Rather disturbing."

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:00:16 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>
>>> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
>>
>> Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
>
> No. Amazingly enough, those who could have caused me problems didn't do
> so. Riled me a bit, but Rl they didn't go for. You OTH took the
> information provided by the remailer and ran with it. It's inexcusable.
>
>> I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
>
> Which boggles the mind why you'd go out of your way to intentionally try
> and cause RL problems for another...My opinion is simply, you aren't the
> good guy you're trying to portray yourself as.
>
>> The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still do!
>
> Not necessarily...Credit card fraud (based on a description you provided
> once before) doesn't always imply they had anything on you.
>
> As I'm sure you'd be curious and would appreciate me elaborating on
> that, I won't.

LOL.

D'you know, if I had considered BD in any way trustworthy for all this
time, he'd have ****loads of personal info on me by now, freely given
with no need for slimy insinuation, impertinent questions and innuendo.

I don't know if you recall some months ago my telling him how trustworthy
I considered him NOT to be in no uncertain terms. All he had to say about
it was 'your comments noted' or some such macro bull**** he usually comes
out with.

His methods definitely fail, and fail badly.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.�

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:

> His methods definitely fail, and fail badly.

I think not.

You have shown yourself up as a shallow and arrogant individual who
cares only about himself, Aardvark.

On the other hand, Dustin is *still* posting in SE (that's a success?
Well, not necessarily a fail!) although he's also demonstrated that he
has many traits in common with Aardvark.