Win 7 Security 2012

[Bullwinkle.]

You were pals back then you should know.


"FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:itnjiv$3k6$1@dont-email.me...
"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
newsGHLp.8386$z96.1521@newsfe20.ams2...
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:08:30 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:
>
>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
>> news:itlua0$rns$1@dont-email.me...
>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> It is NONE of you f'n business - that's why !
>>>
>>> *WRONG*!
>>>
>>> In July 2010, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), at Secretary
>>> Janet Napolitano's direction, launched a national "If You See
>>> Something, Say SomethingT" public awareness campaign -a simple
> and
>>> effective program to raise public awareness of indicators of terrorism
>>> and violent crime, and to emphasize the importance of reporting
>>> suspicious activity to the proper state and local law enforcement
>>> authorities. The campaign was originally used by New York's
>>> Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), which has licensed the use
>>> of the slogan to DHS for anti-terrorism and anti-crime efforts.
>>>
>>> http://www.dhs.gov/files/reportincid...something-say-
> something.shtm
>>
>> Prior to 2010, what lame rationalization did you use to explain away, to
>> yourself, this obsession of yours?
>
> Just that anyone who refuses to answer his impertinent questions must be
> a criminal or a 'terrorist'.
>
> Or both.

My point being that he just now used that DHS document as a
reason (read 'excuse') for him asking such questions (i.e., they
*are* his business) - and yet the lack of this would not have
stopped him in years previous.

What was his excuse *then* - back when PF purportedly had a
visit from them.

Shame on Janet for being such an enabler. D

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in news:ithqfh$3eo$1@dont-email.me:

> Peter Foldes replied incognito ........
>
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> OK - *you* explain, dear Peter, why Siljaline has been removed from
>>> the list of VSOP's at Aumha - a place where you've resided since its
>>> inception. Has he upset the hierarchy there?
>>
>> a. Maybe he found other work.
>> b. Maybe he doesn't have the extra time anymore.
>> c. Maybe he wasn't "removed" but quit for those reasons.
>> d. Maybe he wants to spend more time with family.
>> e. Maybe he bought a boat.
>
> Nah!
>
> He's pretty active here!
>
> http://www.wilderssecurity.com/searc...archid=4150390
>
> The truth *will* out! ;-)
>

Do your local authorities know you're stalking people online David?


--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:37:45 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in news:ithqfh$3eo$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Peter Foldes replied incognito ........
>>
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> OK - *you* explain, dear Peter, why Siljaline has been removed from
>>>> the list of VSOP's at Aumha - a place where you've resided since its
>>>> inception. Has he upset the hierarchy there?
>>>
>>> a. Maybe he found other work.
>>> b. Maybe he doesn't have the extra time anymore. c. Maybe he wasn't
>>> "removed" but quit for those reasons. d. Maybe he wants to spend more
>>> time with family. e. Maybe he bought a boat.
>>
>> Nah!
>>
>> He's pretty active here!
>>
>> http://www.wilderssecurity.com/searc...archid=4150390
>>
>> The truth *will* out! ;-)
>>
>>
> Do your local authorities know you're stalking people online David?

"In the United Kingdom, the Malicious Communications Act (1998)
classified cyberstalking as a criminal offense".

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking>

Looks to me like BD could at least be charged under the Protection from
Harassment Act (1997). Quite a few people on usenet and other places
would be well within their rights to report him under the act.

Quite a few of his posts could be deemed 'offensive' under the MCA
(1998), and therefore actionable by the authorities. Even under the PFA
(1997), BD, if convicted, could have a restraining order placed upon him
to prevent him contacting his targets again, under pain of a nice long
stay in HMP.

"Under section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1998 it is an
offence to send an indecent, offensive or threatening letter, electronic
communication or other article to another person and sections 85 Postal
Services Act 2000 or s127 Communications Act 2003 there are similar
specific offences relating to sending postal or telephone messages which
are indecent offensive or threatening. Both offences are punishable with
up to six months imprisonment and/or a fine. Because the Malicious
Communications Offence is more wide ranging than the Telecommunications
offence it is more likely to be charged by the Police than the Postal
Services or Communications Act offences.

In most cases involving malicious communications however there will be
more than one offensive or threatening letter or telephone call and
therefore the police will often choose to charge the offender with an
offence contrary to section 2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
Part of the reason for using this charge is that when someone is
convicted of an offence under the Protection from Harassment Act the
court can make a Restraining Order preventing them from contacting their
victim again. Breach of a Restraining Order is punishable with up to Five
years imprisonment. A Restraining Order cannot be imposed for a
conviction under the Postal Services or Communications Act offences".

<http://www.neiladdison.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/comm.htm>

FYI
HTH



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:47:24 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com>
>>>
>>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:iteu28$8d1$1@dont-email.me
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm surprised that you didn't recommend a non-ASAP member too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You were a VSOP, weren't you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://web.archive.org/web/200902010...a.org/vsop.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps you feel the site fails to meet requirements nowadays?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some other reason you'd like to mention?
>>>>>
>>>>> David the Troll
>>>>>
>>>>> You lying discriminating piece of crap Troll. It is none your friggin
>>>>> business what people do and on top of that you accuse by innuendos
>>>>> good people
>>>>> Instead of making accusations and innuendos involve yourself with
>>>>> learning how to jump into the middle of the Ocean and holding your
>>>>> breath for 10 minutes underwater and all that time watching the
>>>>> sharks that are circling you.
>>>>>
>>>>> ^%$(*&()
>>>>
>>>> OK - *you* explain, dear Peter, why Siljaline has been removed from
>>>> the list of VSOP's at Aumha - a place where you've resided since its
>>>> inception. Has he upset the hierarchy there?
>>>>
>>>> It's a reasonable question to ask - IMO.
>>>>
>>>> Do you know Silj personally, Peter - he lives in your small town?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It is NONE of you f'n business - that's why !
>>
>> *WRONG*!
>>
>> In July 2010, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), at Secretary
>> Janet Napolitano's direction, launched a national "If You See Something,
>> Say Something™" public awareness campaign –a simple and effective
>> program to raise public awareness of indicators of terrorism and violent
>> crime, and to emphasize the importance of reporting suspicious activity
>> to the proper state and local law enforcement authorities. The campaign
>> was originally used by New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authority
>> (MTA), which has licensed the use of the slogan to DHS for
>> anti-terrorism and anti-crime efforts.
>>
>> http://www.dhs.gov/files/reportincid...something-say-
> something.shtm
>
> What others do is none of your ****ing business.the only crime going on
> is in your highly ****ing fertile imagination.
>
> <http://************/24wtz7>

You are *WRONG* - *again*!

How does that feel?

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:08:30 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:
>
>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
>> news:itlua0$rns$1@dont-email.me...
>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> It is NONE of you f'n business - that's why !
>>>
>>> *WRONG*!
>>>
>>> In July 2010, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), at Secretary
>>> Janet Napolitano's direction, launched a national "If You See
>>> Something, Say Something™" public awareness campaign –a simple
> and
>>> effective program to raise public awareness of indicators of terrorism
>>> and violent crime, and to emphasize the importance of reporting
>>> suspicious activity to the proper state and local law enforcement
>>> authorities. The campaign was originally used by New York's
>>> Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), which has licensed the use
>>> of the slogan to DHS for anti-terrorism and anti-crime efforts.
>>>
>>> http://www.dhs.gov/files/reportincid...something-say-
> something.shtm
>>
>> Prior to 2010, what lame rationalization did you use to explain away, to
>> yourself, this obsession of yours?
>
> Just that anyone who refuses to answer his impertinent questions must be
> a criminal or a 'terrorist'.
>
> Or both.

*WRONG* - *again*!

None of the questions I ask are 'impertinent' - that is subjective.

Normal, everyday 'ordinary' folk respond just as one might expect.

Those who chose to react in some other manner will obviously fall under
suspicion of the authorities and those of us who care about others.

You are a master of spin Aardvark - I have never accused anyone of being
a terrorist. The only criminal I have knowingly encountered is Dustin
(he's admitted same) though I'd not be at all surprised to learn that
/you/ had fallen foul of the law during your lifetime. I know FTR has! ;-)

D.

[Bullwinkle.]

How about in Ireland.

Many records can be had if you know where to ask.


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:itshe0$n6m$1@dont-email.me...
Aardvark wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:08:30 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:
>
>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
>> news:itlua0$rns$1@dont-email.me...
>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> It is NONE of you f'n business - that's why !
>>>
>>> *WRONG*!
>>>
>>> In July 2010, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), at Secretary
>>> Janet Napolitano's direction, launched a national "If You See
>>> Something, Say Something™" public awareness campaign –a simple
> and
>>> effective program to raise public awareness of indicators of terrorism
>>> and violent crime, and to emphasize the importance of reporting
>>> suspicious activity to the proper state and local law enforcement
>>> authorities. The campaign was originally used by New York's
>>> Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), which has licensed the use
>>> of the slogan to DHS for anti-terrorism and anti-crime efforts.
>>>
>>> http://www.dhs.gov/files/reportincid...something-say-
> something.shtm
>>
>> Prior to 2010, what lame rationalization did you use to explain away, to
>> yourself, this obsession of yours?
>
> Just that anyone who refuses to answer his impertinent questions must be
> a criminal or a 'terrorist'.
>
> Or both.

*WRONG* - *again*!

None of the questions I ask are 'impertinent' - that is subjective.

Normal, everyday 'ordinary' folk respond just as one might expect.

Those who chose to react in some other manner will obviously fall under
suspicion of the authorities and those of us who care about others.

You are a master of spin Aardvark - I have never accused anyone of being
a terrorist. The only criminal I have knowingly encountered is Dustin
(he's admitted same) though I'd not be at all surprised to learn that
/you/ had fallen foul of the law during your lifetime. I know FTR has! ;-)

D.

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:50:41 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> I'd not be at all surprised to learn that /you/ had fallen foul of the
> law during your lifetime.

Well, you'll never ****ing know, will you?



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:itshe0$n6m$1@dont-email.me:

> You are a master of spin Aardvark - I have never accused anyone of
> being a terrorist. The only criminal I have knowingly encountered is
> Dustin (he's admitted same) though I'd not be at all surprised to
> learn that /you/ had fallen foul of the law during your lifetime. I
> know FTR has! ;-)

Excuse me? You sure do like making slimy comments about people. Inferring
they might be much more dangerous to society than they really are.



--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:55:46 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in news:itshe0$n6m$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> You are a master of spin Aardvark - I have never accused anyone of
>> being a terrorist. The only criminal I have knowingly encountered is
>> Dustin (he's admitted same) though I'd not be at all surprised to learn
>> that /you/ had fallen foul of the law during your lifetime. I know FTR
>> has! ;-)
>
> Excuse me? You sure do like making slimy comments about people.
> Inferring they might be much more dangerous to society than they really
> are.

All he's saying is that he avoids being up front and forthright at all
costs.

No surprise there.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.”

[SeaNymph]

"Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9F0CACCEAFF98HHI2948AJD832@no...
> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:itshe0$n6m$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> You are a master of spin Aardvark - I have never accused anyone of
>> being a terrorist. The only criminal I have knowingly encountered is
>> Dustin (he's admitted same) though I'd not be at all surprised to
>> learn that /you/ had fallen foul of the law during your lifetime. I
>> know FTR has! ;-)
>
> Excuse me? You sure do like making slimy comments about people. Inferring
> they might be much more dangerous to society than they really are.

One can only wonder why BD is so intent on labeling others as criminals, but
ignores his own criminal behavior.