Computer security tales of woe: =?windows-1252?Q?What=92s_your?==?windows-1252?Q?s=3F?=

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:12:02 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Dustin is *still* posting in SE (that's a success? Well, not necessarily
> a fail!) although he's also demonstrated that he has many traits in
> common with Aardvark.

That's a good thing. glad to hear it.



--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.�

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:ittn7q$6du$1@dont-email.me:

> Dustin wrote:
>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
>> news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
>>>
>>> Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
>>
>> No. Amazingly enough, those who could have caused me problems
>> didn't do so. Riled me a bit, but Rl they didn't go for. You OTH
>> took the information provided by the remailer and ran with it. It's
>> inexcusable.
>>
>>> I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
>>
>> Which boggles the mind why you'd go out of your way to
>> intentionally try and cause RL problems for another...My opinion is
>> simply, you aren't the good guy you're trying to portray yourself
>> as.
>>
>>> The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously
>>> still do!
>>
>> Not necessarily...Credit card fraud (based on a description you
>> provided once before) doesn't always imply they had anything on
>> you.
>>
>> As I'm sure you'd be curious and would appreciate me elaborating on
>> that, I won't.
>
> Here's a thread from wa ...ay back, Dustin!

Funny you should mention way back david brooks. Turns out, you're in
some old ass software. [g]


--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again