Dustin wrote:
> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still do!
Dave
Dustin wrote:
> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still do!
Dave
Your were not. That is another lie!
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me...
Dustin wrote:
> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still do!
Dave
~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me:
> Dustin wrote:
>
>> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
>
> Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
No. Amazingly enough, those who could have caused me problems didn't
do so. Riled me a bit, but Rl they didn't go for. You OTH took the
information provided by the remailer and ran with it. It's
inexcusable.
> I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
Which boggles the mind why you'd go out of your way to intentionally
try and cause RL problems for another...My opinion is simply, you
aren't the good guy you're trying to portray yourself as.
> The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still
> do!
Not necessarily...Credit card fraud (based on a description you
provided once before) doesn't always imply they had anything on you.
As I'm sure you'd be curious and would appreciate me elaborating on
that, I won't.
--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again
Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>
>>> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
>>
>> Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
>
> No. Amazingly enough, those who could have caused me problems didn't
> do so. Riled me a bit, but Rl they didn't go for. You OTH took the
> information provided by the remailer and ran with it. It's
> inexcusable.
>
>> I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
>
> Which boggles the mind why you'd go out of your way to intentionally
> try and cause RL problems for another...My opinion is simply, you
> aren't the good guy you're trying to portray yourself as.
>
>> The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still
>> do!
>
> Not necessarily...Credit card fraud (based on a description you
> provided once before) doesn't always imply they had anything on you.
>
> As I'm sure you'd be curious and would appreciate me elaborating on
> that, I won't.
Here's a thread from wa ...ay back, Dustin!
http://discussions.virtualdr.com/sho...d.php?t=196043
"I have recently had funds repaid to me by PayPal after a fraudulent
withdrawal from my Credit Card account. The matter is now also in the
hands of our Police; I reported the matter when I started to receive
*emails* from [Email link removed by moderator] demanding that "lost"
funds (reclaimed from them by PayPal) be paid directly to themselves.
The writer knew not only where I live - but who lives here with me, the
name of my next door neighbour, when I bought my cottage and how much I
paid for it! Rather disturbing."
~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:ittn7q$6du$1@dont-email.me:
> Dustin wrote:
>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
>> news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
>>>
>>> Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
>>
>> No. Amazingly enough, those who could have caused me problems
>> didn't do so. Riled me a bit, but Rl they didn't go for. You OTH
>> took the information provided by the remailer and ran with it. It's
>> inexcusable.
>>
>>> I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
>>
>> Which boggles the mind why you'd go out of your way to
>> intentionally try and cause RL problems for another...My opinion is
>> simply, you aren't the good guy you're trying to portray yourself
>> as.
>>
>>> The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously
>>> still do!
>>
>> Not necessarily...Credit card fraud (based on a description you
>> provided once before) doesn't always imply they had anything on
>> you.
>>
>> As I'm sure you'd be curious and would appreciate me elaborating on
>> that, I won't.
>
> Here's a thread from wa ...ay back, Dustin!
Funny you should mention way back david brooks. Turns out, you're in
some old ass software. [g]
--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:00:16 +0000, Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in news:itsg8t$g8j$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>
>>> I was *almost* a victim of cybercrime.
>>
>> Maybe it's because of the company you kept back-along.
>
> No. Amazingly enough, those who could have caused me problems didn't do
> so. Riled me a bit, but Rl they didn't go for. You OTH took the
> information provided by the remailer and ran with it. It's inexcusable.
>
>> I actually *was* the victim of Cybercrime, Dustin!
>
> Which boggles the mind why you'd go out of your way to intentionally try
> and cause RL problems for another...My opinion is simply, you aren't the
> good guy you're trying to portray yourself as.
>
>> The perpetrators *did* know my actual address - and obviously still do!
>
> Not necessarily...Credit card fraud (based on a description you provided
> once before) doesn't always imply they had anything on you.
>
> As I'm sure you'd be curious and would appreciate me elaborating on
> that, I won't.
LOL.
D'you know, if I had considered BD in any way trustworthy for all this
time, he'd have ****loads of personal info on me by now, freely given
with no need for slimy insinuation, impertinent questions and innuendo.
I don't know if you recall some months ago my telling him how trustworthy
I considered him NOT to be in no uncertain terms. All he had to say about
it was 'your comments noted' or some such macro bull**** he usually comes
out with.
His methods definitely fail, and fail badly.
--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.â€
Aardvark wrote:
> His methods definitely fail, and fail badly.
I think not.
You have shown yourself up as a shallow and arrogant individual who
cares only about himself, Aardvark.
On the other hand, Dustin is *still* posting in SE (that's a success?
Well, not necessarily a fail!) although he's also demonstrated that he
has many traits in common with Aardvark.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:12:02 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
> Dustin is *still* posting in SE (that's a success? Well, not necessarily
> a fail!) although he's also demonstrated that he has many traits in
> common with Aardvark.
That's a good thing. glad to hear it.
--
"Those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon
lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly
sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and
practical." - Dwight Macdonald, “The Root Is Man.â€
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote