Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Am I violating MBam's EULA?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Li'l Abner Guest

    Am I violating MBam's EULA?

    OK. Here's my story. I'm retired and I enjoy helping people out with
    computer problems. I don't have a store front and word of my abilities has
    just spread by word of mouth. However I only take enough money to replace
    any parts or software I use. So in that sense, I guess these people could
    be called clients. I prefer to just call them friends or frineds of
    friends.

    I asked a question in the MalwareBytes forum about purchasing copies of the
    paid version of MBam and installing it on other people's computers. Lots of
    people are reluctant to use their credit cards online. The person who
    answered suggested that I might be violating their EULA by using
    MalwareBytes to clean up other people's computers. I do have the paid
    version installed on *my* computer, but on computers I work on I always
    download the latest free version and install it. It's the best there is so
    naturally I'm goind to use it... usually first. But I'm not using MY copy.
    So here's the way the EULA starts. Line 1 is the one that counts.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    EULA - End User License Agreement

    Subject to the restrictions below, you may use the Malwarebytes' Software
    for any legitimate purpose.

    In return, we simply require that you agree:

    1. Not to use this software for commercial use without proper licensing.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    What is "proper licensing"?

    What is the difference if I download and install it on Joe's computer and
    Joe doing it himself?

    If I help you shingle your roof, do I have to have a license to use the
    hammer?

    (I'm probably going to lose this one)

    --
    --- Everybody has a right to my opinion. ---

  2. #2
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: Am I violating MBam's EULA?

    Li'l Abner wrote:

    >In return, we simply require that you agree:
    >
    >1. Not to use this software for commercial use without proper licensing.
    >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >What is "proper licensing"?


    I had to think a little on that. My best guess is using the same
    licence on all the machines on a commercial LAN.


  3. #3
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: Am I violating MBam's EULA?

    From: "Li'l Abner" <blvstk@dogpatch.com>

    > OK. Here's my story. I'm retired and I enjoy helping people out with
    > computer problems. I don't have a store front and word of my abilities has
    > just spread by word of mouth. However I only take enough money to replace
    > any parts or software I use. So in that sense, I guess these people could
    > be called clients. I prefer to just call them friends or frineds of
    > friends.
    >
    > I asked a question in the MalwareBytes forum about purchasing copies of the
    > paid version of MBam and installing it on other people's computers. Lots of
    > people are reluctant to use their credit cards online. The person who
    > answered suggested that I might be violating their EULA by using
    > MalwareBytes to clean up other people's computers. I do have the paid
    > version installed on *my* computer, but on computers I work on I always
    > download the latest free version and install it. It's the best there is so
    > naturally I'm goind to use it... usually first. But I'm not using MY copy.
    > So here's the way the EULA starts. Line 1 is the one that counts.
    > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > EULA - End User License Agreement
    >
    > Subject to the restrictions below, you may use the Malwarebytes' Software
    > for any legitimate purpose.
    >
    > In return, we simply require that you agree:
    >
    > 1. Not to use this software for commercial use without proper licensing.
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > What is "proper licensing"?
    >
    > What is the difference if I download and install it on Joe's computer and
    > Joe doing it himself?
    >
    > If I help you shingle your roof, do I have to have a license to use the
    > hammer?
    >
    > (I'm probably going to lose this one)
    >
    > --
    > --- Everybody has a right to my opinion. ---


    If you install the free version on other people's computers, clean them and leave the
    software on their respective computters, I don't think its a EULA violation.

    In those circumstances you should be forthcoming and indicate, to the client, that MBAM is
    installed, was used to clean their respective computer(s) and strongly suggest the
    purchase of the full version.


    --
    Dave
    Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  4. #4
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: Am I violating MBam's EULA?

    From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net>

    > If you install the free version on other people's computers, clean them and leave the
    > software on their respective computters, I don't think its a EULA violation.
    >
    > In those circumstances you should be forthcoming and indicate, to the client, that MBAM
    > is
    > installed, was used to clean their respective computer(s) and strongly suggest the
    > purchase of the full version.
    >


    ADDENDUM:
    I should state I am NOT sure and I *amy* be wrong.



    --
    Dave
    Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  5. #5
    Li'l Abner Guest

    Re: Am I violating MBam's EULA?

    "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in
    news:it6hnb020gr@news7.newsguy.com:

    > From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net>
    >
    >> If you install the free version on other people's computers, clean
    >> them and leave the software on their respective computters, I don't
    >> think its a EULA violation.
    >>
    >> In those circumstances you should be forthcoming and indicate, to the
    >> client, that MBAM is
    >> installed, was used to clean their respective computer(s) and
    >> strongly suggest the purchase of the full version.
    >>

    >
    > ADDENDUM:
    > I should state I am NOT sure and I *amy* be wrong.


    And then again you *amy* be right... :-)

    --
    --- Everybody has a right to my opinion. ---

  6. #6
    Dustin Guest

    Re: Am I violating MBam's EULA?

    "Li'l Abner" <blvstk@dogpatch.com> wrote in
    news:Xns9F03CF0B05719butter@wefb973cbe498:

    > OK. Here's my story. I'm retired and I enjoy helping people out with


    I've snipped your story. Dude, listen...

    I don't want to hear about this again. Ok? I'm not going to bring it up
    and i'm not going to address it.

    > 1. Not to use this software for commercial use without proper
    > licensing.
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------


    Corp versions. Like, if you were an onsite technician. If you charge them
    for the cleaning, you would be using a corp edition and you make special
    arrangements for it. You aren't doing this, so your okay man.



    --
    Why drink the water from my hand?
    Contagious as you think I am
    Just tilt my sun towards your domain
    Your cup runneth over again

  7. #7
    Li'l Abner Guest

    Re: Am I violating MBam's EULA?

    Dustin <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:Xns9F03EE5419CDEHHI2948AJD832@no:

    > "Li'l Abner" <blvstk@dogpatch.com> wrote in
    > news:Xns9F03CF0B05719butter@wefb973cbe498:
    >
    >> OK. Here's my story. I'm retired and I enjoy helping people out with

    >
    > I've snipped your story. Dude, listen...
    >
    > I don't want to hear about this again. Ok? I'm not going to bring it
    > up and i'm not going to address it.
    >
    >> 1. Not to use this software for commercial use without proper
    >> licensing.
    >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

    >
    > Corp versions. Like, if you were an onsite technician. If you charge
    > them for the cleaning, you would be using a corp edition and you make
    > special arrangements for it. You aren't doing this, so your okay man.


    Thanks. That's what I was wanting to hear... :-)

    --
    --- Everybody has a right to my opinion. ---

  8. #8
    VanguardLH Guest

    Re: Am I violating MBam's EULA?

    Li'l Abner wrote:

    > OK. Here's my story. I'm retired and I enjoy helping people out with
    > computer problems. I don't have a store front and word of my abilities has
    > just spread by word of mouth. However I only take enough money to replace
    > any parts or software I use. So in that sense, I guess these people could
    > be called clients. I prefer to just call them friends or frineds of
    > friends.
    >
    > I asked a question in the MalwareBytes forum about purchasing copies of the
    > paid version of MBam and installing it on other people's computers. Lots of
    > people are reluctant to use their credit cards online. The person who
    > answered suggested that I might be violating their EULA by using
    > MalwareBytes to clean up other people's computers. I do have the paid
    > version installed on *my* computer, but on computers I work on I always
    > download the latest free version and install it. It's the best there is so
    > naturally I'm goind to use it... usually first. But I'm not using MY copy.
    > So here's the way the EULA starts. Line 1 is the one that counts.
    > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > EULA - End User License Agreement
    >
    > Subject to the restrictions below, you may use the Malwarebytes' Software
    > for any legitimate purpose.
    >
    > In return, we simply require that you agree:
    >
    > 1. Not to use this software for commercial use without proper licensing.
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > What is "proper licensing"?
    >
    > What is the difference if I download and install it on Joe's computer and
    > Joe doing it himself?
    >
    > If I help you shingle your roof, do I have to have a license to use the
    > hammer?
    >
    > (I'm probably going to lose this one)


    You can download it once and then copy the installer to as many hosts as
    you want. If it's the free version, no more requirements. If it's the
    paid version, you'll be prompted for the license key when you do the
    install. There is no restrictions on how many copies of the installer
    you have as that itself is not an installation or use of the licensed
    software (in fact, there's a good chance that the installer is NOT their
    product but someone else's product they used to bundle their software
    files).

    Whether the free or paid version, you can have as many copies of the
    installer as you want as you haven't installed anything yet with it.
    The license applies to the software delivered by the installer, not to
    the installer itself. If the free version, you can use the same
    installer on multiple hosts or make copies of the installer and use that
    on other hosts. Same for the paid version EXCEPT the step where you
    have to enter the license key after which you actually have an
    *instance* of the software against which the license applies.

    When you run MBAM's installer and get to a dialog where you can click on
    the titlebar icon (left end) to select About, you will see the install
    is Inno Setup (www.innosetup.com). That's Inno's product, not MBAM's.
    They don't own Inno. They cannot regulate the distribution or execution
    of their installer for a license of a product that isn't their property.
    Put the installer on a USB thumb drive, memory card, DVD, e-mail it, FTP
    it, store it on online storage to retrieve it from there (although by
    then you might as well as just download it from MBAM) or do whatever you
    want with the installer to get it to the other hosts. MBAM's license
    doesn't apply against that installer program. It only applies against
    whatever the installer delivers.

    MBAM's license applies only against their property, not Inno's property.
    Only after you run the installer to deliver MBAM's property is their
    licensing applicable. Even MBAM knows that. Read their EULA which
    states, "By installing or running this software, ...". "This software"
    is their software, not Inno's installer program. The clause "This
    License applies to one instance of the Software, which may only be
    installed on one computer at a time." is to restrict the distribution of
    the license (which is moot in the case of the free version regarding
    distribution). It's for the paid version to ensure that one license is
    installed on only one computer, not repeatedly installed on other
    computers.

    So it looks like you are just fine the way you are doing things. Their
    license doesn't apply against the Inno installer so you can make as many
    copies as you want and distribute it to as many hosts as you want. It's
    when you *run* the installer to then deposit MBAM's software that their
    license comes into play - but really don't make logical sense regarding
    the free version and applies to their commercial version. Since you
    aren't repeatedly installing the same paid-for version on multiple
    computers, you are not violating their EULA.

  9. #9
    Dustin Guest

    Re: Am I violating MBam's EULA?

    VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote in news:it6uit$sn2$1@news.albasani.net:

    > You can download it once and then copy the installer to as many
    > hosts as you want. If it's the free version, no more requirements.


    Not exactly. You can download it, install it and make use of it, but
    you cannot be making money by doing so. if you are, you legally should
    be acquiring the corporate version license. The free version is
    intended for end users who aren't charging to clean a machine as it's
    usually, well, theirs.

    > product, not MBAM's. They don't own Inno. They cannot regulate the
    > distribution or execution of their installer for a license of a
    > product that isn't their property. Put the installer on a USB thumb


    Malwarebytes most certainly can regulate the distribution of the
    installer, Vanguard. You should see inno's licensing terms. You are,
    again, talking completely runny **** from your ass. Violent, explosive
    diarhea.


    > installer to get it to the other hosts. MBAM's license doesn't
    > apply against that installer program. It only applies against
    > whatever the installer delivers.


    The "installer" is carrying malwarebytes software. It's a glorified
    shell for stupid windows users. Malwarebytes does legally have the
    right to dictate how that executable is distributed.

    I told you last time, if you talk ****, I might call you on it.

    > MBAM's license applies only against their property, not Inno's
    > property. Only after you run the installer to deliver MBAM's


    Idiot.

    > So it looks like you are just fine the way you are doing things.


    He is, because he isn't running a shop and charging people. If he was,
    he'd be against the terms of the licensing.

    > Their license doesn't apply against the Inno installer so you can
    > make as many copies as you want and distribute it to as many hosts
    > as you want. It's when you *run* the installer to then deposit


    Actually, If Malwarebytes wanted to be pissy about that, they could
    change who/what can host the executable. Inno does own the installer,
    but they sublease rights to authors who make use of it. IE: They don't
    interfere. You are talking 100% explosive ****, again.

    > MBAM's software that their license comes into play - but really
    > don't make logical sense regarding the free version and applies to


    Considering I believe you still run a keygenned version right? What do
    you care one way or the other?


    --
    Why drink the water from my hand?
    Contagious as you think I am
    Just tilt my sun towards your domain
    Your cup runneth over again

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •