Dustin wrote:
> G. Morgan<G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
> news:jpqfv65ck9spb8bttjo8fms4c2nkj34ipu@Osama-is-dead.net:
>
>> I don't know why you thought I was being "cheeky", I certainly
>> didn't mean anything smart-ass. I already told you (I thought) I
>> don't write code.
>
> I didn't remember you mentioning that.. Sorry. It just seemed cheeky to
> me.
>
>

Dustin - you obviously know your stuff. No one is challenging you on that.

Have you *ever*, though, loaded MBAM onto a fresh/clean computer and
then run the programme? (the result should of course be that nothing
untoward would have been found).

Have you then uninstalled MBAM and then *forensically examined* the
machine to determine if MBAM has, possibly, surrupticially installed
it's very own malware - maybe a rootkit?

Have you ever tested SuperAntispyware in a similar manner?

If you have *not* done so ..... how can you be *certain* that nothing
has been 'left behind'?

Nobody has so far claimed that this exercise *has* been carried out. It
appears that everyone simply assumes all is above board, so to speak. It
may not be!

D.