Dustin wrote:

>Evidently you didn't catch my clarification request... MBAM has
>proprietary technology which allows it to hook lol (hehehe.. damn, I
>wish I could tell you) the file system.

And I wish I knew!

> MBAM is NOT malicious and
>doesn't install a rootkit or do anything else. I just can't tell you
>any specifics man, sorry. If you think it's malicious, your about as
>bright as BD.

I don't think it's malicious, it's installed on my machines!


>Did you seriously not catch what I really intended with my question?

Of course I did, we'll see what he comes up with. ;-)

>> That is not a trade secret I'm sure.
>
>Sadly, it is. Everybodies is. SuperAntispyware isn't going to cough up
>their specs either. LOL.

I'm not talking about revealing code, I'm more interested in the
methodology. I guess I will have to do my own research. Maybe I can
get you to confirm or deny my suppositions when I learn a little more?