ASCII wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> he's a good man even though he smokes pot!
>
> In that case, he's an even better man!
> Likely relaxed and unburdened by life's intricacies.
Didn't stop him getting toothache though! ;-)
Maybe one day I'll try it (for medicinal reasons, of course!)
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:it9d61$qn5$1@dont-email.me...
[...]
> Have you then uninstalled MBAM and then *forensically examined* the machine to
> determine if MBAM has, possibly, surrupticially installed it's very own
> malware - maybe a rootkit?
Surreptitiously.
Just a warning this time, next time you will be hauled in
front of a spelling judge.
~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:itcb9g$4mp$1@dont-email.me:
> Dustin wrote:
>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
>> news:it9d61$qn5$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Dustin - you obviously know your stuff. No one is challenging you
>>> on that.
>>
>> Yes, I do. I told you I did in the beginning. In fact, I've
>> told you how I operate. I want you to know what I'm holding so that
>> when you do do something stupid, or get somebody else to, they
>> can't say they weren't warned that I'd pull and use the double
>> barrel and cut them in half. I play fair in that regard. You aren't
>> challenging me on it now, and Graham I doubt will be again any time
>> soon.
>
> Black hats know their stuff too, Dustin. <grin>
Well, just where do you suppose I learned most of it, David? I wasn't
always a nice guy...
> However, my comments are *not* intended to be a wind-up in any way.
> You've asked me to be straight-forward and ask you questions
Sure they aren't...Excuse me if I don't believe you, ok?
> I like Graham too - but he's certainly *not* "one of my lackies"!
Why the inuendo attack participation towards malwarebytes then? Nobody in
their right mind developing an antimalware product would risk doing
something so stupid as to have it do something and not let the user know
about it. You're a POS for even suggesting that.
>> Did you enjoy his schooling?
>
> I did find what you said interesting.
I'll bet you did. I told you, I don't ****ing bull**** and I don't play
games.
> You are wrong about that. I urge you to reconsider cutting Graham
> from your group of associates - he's a good man (even though he
> smokes pot! <s>)
I have no problem with pot, David. You've got me ****ed up with somebody
else. I've smoked it myself.
> *Why* did you do so?
Research purposes. I like reverse engineering software. I was examining
it's registration system. I cracked it for my own personal use in full
registered mode so I could tinker with it.
> *Why* did you? Were you suspicious about something?
See above.
>>> Have you ever tested SuperAntispyware in a similar manner?
>>
>> Again, YES I have.
>
> What made you decide to do so, Dustin?
I wanted all the features for free and didn't wanna do what everybody
else does, just download a keygen. I'm a curious person...
I have since acquired legitimate licenses and the executables are not
patched. [g]
>> Because I've done those things.
>
> An explanation of your reasons for so doing will be appreciated.
> Out of interest, *when* did you look so closely at these products?
Before I had decent cash flow...
> Might they have changed since you did your research? <rhetorical>
Nope.
>> I just wanted to see how far this would have to go before I
>> actually said something about it. Some people just don't learn.
>
> Please clarify what you mean by this, Dustin. I'm trying *not* to
> read between the lines! TIA.
It's self explanatory. You're paranoid as I said from the getgo because
you haven't got a clue how that box in front of you works inside, and
sadly, I don't think you ever will. It's mystical to you.
--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again
~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in news:itd35t$mjs$1@dont-email.me:
> ASCII wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> he's a good man even though he smokes pot!
>>
>> In that case, he's an even better man!
>> Likely relaxed and unburdened by life's intricacies.
>
> Didn't stop him getting toothache though! ;-)
Why would it? Alcohol is more likely to give you one. Know why? It rotts
them!
--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again
Dustin wrote:
[snip]
> It's self explanatory. You're paranoid as I said from the getgo
> because you haven't got a clue how that box in front of you works
> inside, and sadly, I don't think you ever will. It's mystical to you.
OT, but do you think BD and Bullwinkle could be the same person?
They use the same type of arguments and phrasing of sentences.
Just curious.
Buffalo
PS: Thanks for all you input in this NG.
Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:itcb9g$4mp$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
>>> news:it9d61$qn5$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> Dustin - you obviously know your stuff. No one is challenging you
>>>> on that.
>>>
>>> Yes, I do. I told you I did in the beginning. In fact, I've
>>> told you how I operate. I want you to know what I'm holding so that
>>> when you do do something stupid, or get somebody else to, they
>>> can't say they weren't warned that I'd pull and use the double
>>> barrel and cut them in half. I play fair in that regard. You aren't
>>> challenging me on it now, and Graham I doubt will be again any time
>>> soon.
>>
>> Black hats know their stuff too, Dustin.<grin>
>
> Well, just where do you suppose I learned most of it, David? I wasn't
> always a nice guy...
<shock> ;-)
>> However, my comments are *not* intended to be a wind-up in any way.
>> You've asked me to be straight-forward and ask you questions
>
> Sure they aren't...Excuse me if I don't believe you, ok?
You should believe me. I told you I tell the truth and *am* being
straight-forward.
>> I like Graham too - but he's certainly *not* "one of my lackies"!
>
> Why the inuendo attack participation towards malwarebytes then? Nobody in
> their right mind developing an antimalware product would risk doing
> something so stupid as to have it do something and not let the user know
> about it. You're a POS for even suggesting that.
>
>>> Did you enjoy his schooling?
>>
>> I did find what you said interesting.
>
> I'll bet you did. I told you, I don't ****ing bull**** and I don't play
> games.
You should smile more, Dustin! :-)
>> You are wrong about that. I urge you to reconsider cutting Graham
>> from your group of associates - he's a good man (even though he
>> smokes pot!<s>)
>
> I have no problem with pot, David. You've got me ****ed up with somebody
> else. I've smoked it myself.
You should smile more, Dustin! :-)
>> *Why* did you do so?
>
> Research purposes. I like reverse engineering software. I was examining
> it's registration system. I cracked it for my own personal use in full
> registered mode so I could tinker with it.
>
>> *Why* did you? Were you suspicious about something?
>
> See above.
>
>>>> Have you ever tested SuperAntispyware in a similar manner?
>>>
>>> Again, YES I have.
>>
>> What made you decide to do so, Dustin?
>
> I wanted all the features for free and didn't wanna do what everybody
> else does, just download a keygen. I'm a curious person...
>
> I have since acquired legitimate licenses and the executables are not
> patched. [g]
Thank you. Maybe someone else reading here also has the skill to
forensically examine a machine in the same way. They may even get
different results!
>>> Because I've done those things.
>>
>> An explanation of your reasons for so doing will be appreciated.
>> Out of interest, *when* did you look so closely at these products?
>
> Before I had decent cash flow...
A while back then?
>
>> Might they have changed since you did your research?<rhetorical>
>
> Nope.
That's a guess - it *must* be!
>>> I just wanted to see how far this would have to go before I
>>> actually said something about it. Some people just don't learn.
>>
>> Please clarify what you mean by this, Dustin. I'm trying *not* to
>> read between the lines! TIA.
>
> It's self explanatory. You're paranoid as I said from the getgo because
> you haven't got a clue how that box in front of you works inside, and
> sadly, I don't think you ever will. It's mystical to you.
I admit that I know more about cars/engines than I do about computers!
I love things which work 'automagically', btw! :-)
Others can, and do, help me with the technicalities of computers.
D.
LOL!
Highlight reel maker of the day.
bd is much further down the evolution ladder.
BTW you are still a leech.
"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:itdug0$q4j$1@dont-email.me...
Dustin wrote:
[snip]
> It's self explanatory. You're paranoid as I said from the getgo
> because you haven't got a clue how that box in front of you works
> inside, and sadly, I don't think you ever will. It's mystical to you.
OT, but do you think BD and Bullwinkle could be the same person?
They use the same type of arguments and phrasing of sentences.
Just curious.
Buffalo
PS: Thanks for all you input in this NG.
Bullwinkle. wrote:
> LOL!
>
> Highlight reel maker of the day.
>
> bd is much further down the evolution ladder.
>
> BTW you are still a leech.
Just for everyone's info:
Bullwinkle calls me a leech because I got drafted (USA) and served my two
years and got out. He stated that people that did that are cowards because
they didn't volunteer and HAD to be Drafted to serve in the military and he
also stated that those that served (after being Drafted) were people not
SMART enough to avoid it. Arrogant SOB!!
Yes, he sounds like a patriot, doesn't he?
Buffalo
PS: He is either at the same level or only a rung off.
From: "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid>
>
> Bullwinkle. wrote:
>> LOL!
>>
>> Highlight reel maker of the day.
>>
>> bd is much further down the evolution ladder.
>>
>> BTW you are still a leech.
>
> Just for everyone's info:
> Bullwinkle calls me a leech because I got drafted (USA) and served my two
> years and got out. He stated that people that did that are cowards because
> they didn't volunteer and HAD to be Drafted to serve in the military and he
> also stated that those that served (after being Drafted) were people not
> SMART enough to avoid it. Arrogant SOB!!
> Yes, he sounds like a patriot, doesn't he?
> Buffalo
> PS: He is either at the same level or only a rung off.
>
Buffalo:
T H A N K Y O U
For your service !
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in
news:itg8hq$t97$1@dont-email.me:
>
>
> Bullwinkle. wrote:
>> LOL!
>>
>> Highlight reel maker of the day.
>>
>> bd is much further down the evolution ladder.
>>
>> BTW you are still a leech.
>
>
> Just for everyone's info:
> Bullwinkle calls me a leech because I got drafted (USA) and served my
> two years and got out. He stated that people that did that are cowards
> because they didn't volunteer and HAD to be Drafted to serve in the
> military and he also stated that those that served (after being
> Drafted) were people not SMART enough to avoid it. Arrogant SOB!!
> Yes, he sounds like a patriot, doesn't he?
> Buffalo
> PS: He is either at the same level or only a rung off.
>
actually he comes across as being mentally disabled or at least a good
case of borderline personaility disorder.
<nods>
--
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
http://stopbeck.com|www.snuhwolf.9f....eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote