Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:Ns-dnfCOJsL-30HQnZ2dnUVZ8vadnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>
>> See
>> http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php...1&hl=BugHunter
>
> I've seen the thread, since you brought it up the first time in 2007.
> It means about the same to me now as it did then. It's just another
> example of your slimeball antics. When you can write something even
> close to what BugHunter is, then we'll compare notes.

Again you choose to misunderstand my motives. I'm simply searching for
the truth but I do realise that the bad guys won't give up their secrets
easily.

What I am particularly confused about is why you simply dropped what is
(was?) a unique product and blame it on the lack of time. You find
plenty of time to post here!

Maybe the moderator at Kaspersky was right - one man simply cannot hope
to cope with such a huge task.

Have you ever considered asking your colleagues at Malwarebytes to feed
you rogue items to add to your BugHunter data base? Surely quite an easy
thing to achieve in this day and age, if they were willing to share. And
why wouldn't they - they are in the business of defeating Malware,
however it may be achieved?

If you had the will, surely you could find a way.