Six rising threats from cybercriminals

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:ir90ke$ii5$1@dont-email.me:

> Yes - but still interestin, don't you agree?

It's FUD to me.

>> Your efforts to hunt bad guys are a lost cause then. Until you
>> understand them and can discuss the technology which is their
>> world, you're screwed.
>
> Those really clever technical fellows are already being screwed as
> you so eloquently put it!

That's the way the world works. Some get ****ed over, some get ****ed,
some just get some. The world just isn't fair.

>> For the most part, in the digital age, it does and *you* typically
>> don't win.
>
> I'd like you to have used *we* - rather than *you*!

I'm not "hunting" bad guys. We wouldn't apply.

> It sounds as if you are on the opposite side to me, Dustin!

I'm not trying to annoy or otherwise irritate people just because I
can, no.

> Surely you've changed your spots - haven't you?

Again with the spots. Fact is, unless you can find something I wrote
after the year 2000 which is inherently malicious, you are ****ed. You
will never be able to support that accusation. Ever.

> I meant that I was doing such stuff 30 years ago with my boys! Duh!

Then you should have *easily* determined what each line did.

>> I've noticed you avoided the simple task I provided you, yes. And
>> instead are asking about SSL again. (that's the [s] in http(s))
>
> I've been busy enjoying real life Dustin! Maybe I'll post a photo or
> two later!

Why bother asking questions of a technical nature if you intend to
learn nothing from them? And will not put the information to good use?

> You *never* show the curiosity I expect from a young and bright
> mind!

I'm curious about things *I don't already know*, David. Not things I do
and that have been done to death.

> I did it all years ago, Dustin. In the whole scheme of things, it's
> not necessary for *me* to remember such detail!

You didn't do ****, you aren't **** and you will never be ****.


--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:ir90ke$ii5$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Yes - but still interestin, don't you agree?
>
> It's FUD to me.
>
>>> Your efforts to hunt bad guys are a lost cause then. Until you
>>> understand them and can discuss the technology which is their
>>> world, you're screwed.
>>
>> Those really clever technical fellows are already being screwed as
>> you so eloquently put it!
>
> That's the way the world works. Some get ****ed over, some get ****ed,
> some just get some. The world just isn't fair.
>
>>> For the most part, in the digital age, it does and *you* typically
>>> don't win.
>>
>> I'd like you to have used *we* - rather than *you*!
>
> I'm not "hunting" bad guys. We wouldn't apply.

Maybe you *should* be!

>> It sounds as if you are on the opposite side to me, Dustin!
>
> I'm not trying to annoy or otherwise irritate people just because I
> can, no.

Now that is good to hear! Maybe you are growing up at last.

>> Surely you've changed your spots - haven't you?
>
> Again with the spots. Fact is, unless you can find something I wrote
> after the year 2000 which is inherently malicious, you are ****ed. You
> will never be able to support that accusation. Ever.

I'm accusing you of nothing.

However, here in this very group, you have admitted that you and your
cohorts steal music, thus - you are *still* a criminal.

>> I meant that I was doing such stuff 30 years ago with my boys! Duh!
>
> Then you should have *easily* determined what each line did.

I didn't try.

>>> I've noticed you avoided the simple task I provided you, yes. And
>>> instead are asking about SSL again. (that's the [s] in http(s))
>>
>> I've been busy enjoying real life Dustin! Maybe I'll post a photo or
>> two later!
>
> Why bother asking questions of a technical nature if you intend to
> learn nothing from them? And will not put the information to good use?

You have no idea how much I learn!

>> You *never* show the curiosity I expect from a young and bright
>> mind!
>
> I'm curious about things *I don't already know*, David. Not things I do
> and that have been done to death.

OK - so answer this question!

http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t...st=0&sk=t&sd=a

>> I did it all years ago, Dustin. In the whole scheme of things, it's
>> not necessary for *me* to remember such detail!
>
> You didn't do ****, you aren't **** and you will never be ****.

I've always been ****-hot at *everything* I've ever done Dustin!

--
Dave - 'nite!

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:BY2dnd7ult7yFETQnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com...
> Dustin wrote:
>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in


>OK - so answer this question!
>
> http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t...st=0&sk=t&sd=a


I can answer you if you are willing to hear it

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
>
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
> news:BY2dnd7ult7yFETQnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Dustin wrote:
>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
>
>
>> OK - so answer this question!
>>
>> http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t...st=0&sk=t&sd=a
>
>
> I can answer you if you are willing to hear it
>

I'll most certainly listen to anything you wish to say.

I would much prefer you to be truthful too. Perhaps that involves
providing some *evidence* to corroborate what you have to say!

Please continue - the floor is yours!

[Bullwinkle.]

LOL That why you washed out of flying because you were **** hot?

More likely because you were/are just ****.


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:BY2dnd7ult7yFETQnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com...

I've always been ****-hot at *everything* I've ever done Dustin!

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:rfWdnXdiw94xgEfQnZ2dnUVZ8mGdnZ2d@bt.com...
> Peter Foldes wrote:


> I'll most certainly listen to anything you wish to say.
>
> I would much prefer you to be truthful too. Perhaps that involves providing some
> *evidence* to corroborate what you have to say!
>
> Please continue - the floor is yours!


Here is your answer so as you would know and shows that I do answer your concerns
about bad people. Now for the answer straight out of the good book "It is none of
your friggin business"

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:BY2dnd7ult7yFETQnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com:

> Maybe you *should* be!

Why should I meddle in other peoples affairs? I have enough to contend
with in my own life.

>> Again with the spots. Fact is, unless you can find something I
>> wrote after the year 2000 which is inherently malicious, you are
>> ****ed. You will never be able to support that accusation. Ever.
>
> I'm accusing you of nothing.

Slimeball. You make innuendo comments often.

> However, here in this very group, you have admitted that you and
> your cohorts steal music, thus - you are *still* a criminal.

Perhaps you should look up the definition of stealing. As you don't
seem to have a very good grasp on it. If I stole something, I've taken
it from you; I have it, you don't. Obviously, that's not what's going
on here.

I'm not going to debate the crminality of it, I simply don't care. In
fact, I'm okay with it. I and my "co-horts" and MILLIONS of other
people around the world are okay with what we do. To quote Cold, "Kill
the ****in music industry!"

> I didn't try.

*yawn*. ok.

> You have no idea how much I learn!

I have a good idea, based on the questions you still present after the
information has been provided by various individuals. let's take, HTML
for example. [g]

> OK - so answer this question!
>
> http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t...st=0&sk=t&sd=a

No.

> I've always been ****-hot at *everything* I've ever done Dustin!

Not true. I thought you said you never lied? You did flunk out of
flying, didn't ya?




--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:BY2dnd7ult7yFETQnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Maybe you *should* be!
>
> Why should I meddle in other peoples affairs? I have enough to contend
> with in my own life.

You need to ask me why?! You have been blessed with the skill required
to help track down and expose cybercriminals.

Such folk steal $billions every year, the effect of which is to increase
expenditure for everyone. Not only that, I'm confident that much funding
for terrorist training and action will be achieved by stealing on-line.

Life wasn't meant to be easy! You could, and should, try to make a
difference and help protect others.

>>> Again with the spots. Fact is, unless you can find something I
>>> wrote after the year 2000 which is inherently malicious, you are
>>> ****ed. You will never be able to support that accusation. Ever.
>>
>> I'm accusing you of nothing.
>
> You make innuendo comments often.

Sometimes. At other times you read the wrong meaning into things I say
(write) because you don't stop to think for a moment or two.

>> However, here in this very group, you have admitted that you and
>> your cohorts steal music, thus - you are *still* a criminal.

> Perhaps you should look up the definition of stealing. As you don't
> seem to have a very good grasp on it. If I stole something, I've taken
> it from you; I have it, you don't. Obviously, that's not what's going
> on here.
>
> I'm not going to debate the crminality of it, I simply don't care. In
> fact, I'm okay with it. I and my "co-horts" and MILLIONS of other
> people around the world are okay with what we do. To quote Cold, "Kill
> the ****in music industry!"

I've heard you say this before. Just because *you* don't care, doesn't
make something lawful. Not a biggie for me either, though, btw!

>> I didn't try.
>
> *yawn*. ok.
>
>> You have no idea how much I learn!
>
> I have a good idea, based on the questions you still present after the
> information has been provided by various individuals. let's take, HTML
> for example. [g]

There is method in my madness!

>> OK - so answer this question!
>>
>> http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t...st=0&sk=t&sd=a
>
> No.

You forgot to add "I can't"! Beyond your skill level, eh?

>> I've always been ****-hot at *everything* I've ever done Dustin!
>
> Not true. I thought you said you never lied? You did flunk out of
> flying, didn't ya?

Very few reach this stage, Dustin!
http://i357.photobucket.com/albums/o...twings1968.jpg

Let's just say that I was advised much later, after many hours flying
*fast* jets low level around the hills and valleys of Wales, that a
career change might be in my own best interest!

HTH
HAND

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:xuCdnT-CEtpqwEbQnZ2dnUVZ8iSdnZ2d@bt.com:

> You need to ask me why?! You have been blessed with the skill
> required to help track down and expose cybercriminals.

I've learned alot about computers and networks. One has nothing to do
with the other. My skills are neutral. It's upto me what good/bad is
done with them.

> Life wasn't meant to be easy! You could, and should, try to make a
> difference and help protect others.

I have.
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk

> I've heard you say this before. Just because *you* don't care,
> doesn't make something lawful. Not a biggie for me either, though,
> btw!

Slavery was lawful once too, wasn't right. Law<>just,moral,the right
thing to do.

> There is method in my madness!

OTW, You don't grasp the concepts.

>>> OK - so answer this question!
>>>
>>> http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t...st=0&sk=t&sd=a
>>
>> No.
>
> You forgot to add "I can't"! Beyond your skill level, eh?

Has the attempts at reverse psy worked for you yet? Have you been able
to get me to do anything for you? Do you really think, I'll do it just
to prove I can? The fact it has aumha.net in the url and I know how
badly you want info on it, is why I said No. [g]

I won't do anything on purpose to help you in any fashion, David. You
may call my skills into question if you like, I find it hillarious when
you do. It only shows how uneducated you really are concerning me.

> Very few reach this stage, Dustin!

Flunking out? That's pretty easy to do.


--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
> news:xuCdnT-CEtpqwEbQnZ2dnUVZ8iSdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> You need to ask me why?! You have been blessed with the skill
>> required to help track down and expose cybercriminals.
>
> I've learned a lot about computers and networks. One has nothing to do
> with the other. My skills are neutral. It's up to me what good/bad is
> done with them.

You think?

>> Life wasn't meant to be easy! You could, and should, try to make a
>> difference and help protect others.
>
> I have.
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk

So why did *you* 'flunk out'?

It never reached maturity, did it?