John wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>> There is nothing wrong with my 17" screen's ability to provide more real
>> estate and pixels than I need to read properly designed .pdf/s.
>>
>
> @ Mike Easter
>
> It's time for my bed now - but you might like to report your
> observations on the Trend forum, here:-
>
> http://community.trendmicro.com/t5/H...d-p/homeoffice
Well, I'm not a big one for trying to convince someone to fix something
they built into a manner to suit me.
The ideal way to demonstrate my many gripes, and I haven't even gotten
to what I think is wrong with the way they built a couple of their pie
graphs, would be to 'rebuild' the .pdf into a proper configuration.
And one still wouldn't be able to fix the poor resolution of the
graphics without having some good rez graphics to begin with.
Maybe someone built/created this paper into a little square printed
booklet and they took the booklet and scanned it in OCR mode so that
made it possible to copy the text and the result was something designed
for a square printed booklet, not a screen display.
Whereas the linux magazine was designed with Scribus from the ground up
for screen display.
What needs to happen with the Trend doc if there is digital content of
all of the pieces is to 'republish' the document in a better format.
--
Mike Easter
Reply With Quote