TrendLabs 'Threat Trends 2010' - a very interesting report!

[Mike Easter]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> "Mike Easter"

>> The best way to see both halves of p2 is to use the hand tool to move
>> the 100% zoom level page manually from the left to the right, and then
>> you still can't actually make out what is written in the screenshots.

> There is nothing wrong at this end. Everything is clear and sharp and
> very readable

If you enlarge the poor resolution graphics on p2 R to 200% from 100%,
you will see that the graphics text is mostly in something resembling
Cyrillic. I don't believe that you are finding that 'readable'.

Re the text: I can read the gray on gray at 100%, but at 100% zoom, the
whole page isn't on the screen. That is inconvenient.

I can put the whole page on the screen in a black shadowbox arrangement
(black fields at bottom and top), but then the gray on gray text is much
smaller. While it is readable, it isn't my choice of 'clear and sharp'
because it would be clearer and sharper if there were either more
contrast or it were larger.


--
Mike Easter

[Peter Foldes]

"Mike Easter" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:93g8ksF3aeU1@mid.individual.net...
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>> "Mike Easter"
>
>>> The best way to see both halves of p2 is to use the hand tool to move the 100%
>>> zoom level page manually from the left to the right, and then you still can't
>>> actually make out what is written in the screenshots.
>
>> There is nothing wrong at this end. Everything is clear and sharp and very
>> readable
>
> If you enlarge the poor resolution graphics on p2 R to 200% from 100%, you will
> see that the graphics text is mostly in something resembling Cyrillic. I don't
> believe that you are finding that 'readable'.
>
> Re the text: I can read the gray on gray at 100%, but at 100% zoom, the whole page
> isn't on the screen. That is inconvenient.
>
> I can put the whole page on the screen in a black shadowbox arrangement (black
> fields at bottom and top), but then the gray on gray text is much smaller. While
> it is readable, it isn't my choice of 'clear and sharp' because it would be
> clearer and sharper if there were either more contrast or it were larger.



I do not see it at 200 Mike but at 400 it shows. Who would enlarge it when it is
perfectly ledgeable and readable at 100.

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect