TrendLabs 'Threat Trends 2010' - a very interesting report!

[Peter Foldes]

"Mike Easter" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:93g8ksF3aeU1@mid.individual.net...
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>> "Mike Easter"
>
>>> The best way to see both halves of p2 is to use the hand tool to move the 100%
>>> zoom level page manually from the left to the right, and then you still can't
>>> actually make out what is written in the screenshots.
>
>> There is nothing wrong at this end. Everything is clear and sharp and very
>> readable
>
> If you enlarge the poor resolution graphics on p2 R to 200% from 100%, you will
> see that the graphics text is mostly in something resembling Cyrillic. I don't
> believe that you are finding that 'readable'.
>
> Re the text: I can read the gray on gray at 100%, but at 100% zoom, the whole page
> isn't on the screen. That is inconvenient.
>
> I can put the whole page on the screen in a black shadowbox arrangement (black
> fields at bottom and top), but then the gray on gray text is much smaller. While
> it is readable, it isn't my choice of 'clear and sharp' because it would be
> clearer and sharper if there were either more contrast or it were larger.



I do not see it at 200 Mike but at 400 it shows. Who would enlarge it when it is
perfectly ledgeable and readable at 100.

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

[Mike Easter]

Peter Foldes wrote:

> Are you answering BD or John Mike? They are one and the same

BD adopts more and more pure troll behaviors - nymshifting,
crossposting, instigating.

Strange. Like watching a weed grow.


--
Mike Easter

[John]

Peter Foldes wrote:
>
> "Mike Easter" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
> news:93gd4oF36iU1@mid.individual.net...
>> John wrote:
>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>
>>>> There is nothing wrong with my 17" screen's ability to provide more
>>>> real
>>>> estate and pixels than I need to read properly designed .pdf/s.
>>>>
>
>
> Are you answering BD or John Mike? They are one and the same
>

Can you *prove* that, Mr Foldes?

[Mac User]

On 18/05/2011 10:00, John wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>
>> "Mike Easter" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:93gd4oF36iU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> John wrote:
>>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>>
>>>>> There is nothing wrong with my 17" screen's ability to provide more
>>>>> real
>>>>> estate and pixels than I need to read properly designed .pdf/s.
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> Are you answering BD or John Mike? They are one and the same
>>
>
> Can you *prove* that, Mr Foldes?


Of course he can't prove it!

It's *all supposition* on his part. He's a ****wit!

[Bullwinkle.]

"bd lite" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:93gajkFhc5U1@mid.individual.net...

Just another stooge

[Peter Foldes]

"Mac User" <A_BetterM@chine.I'm.sure> wrote in message
news:ir0243$utr$1@dont-email.me...
> On 18/05/2011 10:00, John wrote:
>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>
>>> "Mike Easter" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:93gd4oF36iU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> John wrote:
>>>>> Mike Easter wrote:



LOL. Now you added Mac User. You are an idiot

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
>
> "Mac User" <A_BetterM@chine.I'm.sure> wrote in message
> news:ir0243$utr$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 18/05/2011 10:00, John wrote:
>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Mike Easter" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:93gd4oF36iU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> John wrote:
>>>>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>
>
>
> LOL. Now you added Mac User. You are an idiot
>

http://members.shaw.ca/dts-l/default.htm

[John]

Peter Foldes wrote:
>
> "Mac User" <A_BetterM@chine.I'm.sure> wrote in message
> news:ir0243$utr$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 18/05/2011 10:00, John wrote:
>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Mike Easter" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:93gd4oF36iU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> John wrote:
>>>>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>
>
>
> LOL. Now you added Mac User. You are an idiot
>

As I said, it's *all supposition* on your part, Foldes. You're a ****wit!

[Bullwinkle.]

but you are an abuser.

Did you do the dna tests yet?

Afraid ????

Hmmm maybe you are both a grandpa and daddy to the child.




"John" <John@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:ir0pab$408$1@speranza.aioe.org...
Peter Foldes wrote:
>
> "Mac User" <A_BetterM@chine.I'm.sure> wrote in message
> news:ir0243$utr$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 18/05/2011 10:00, John wrote:
>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Mike Easter" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:93gd4oF36iU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> John wrote:
>>>>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>
>
>
> LOL. Now you added Mac User. You are an idiot
>

As I said, it's *all supposition* on your part, Foldes. You're a ****wit!

[Dustin]

Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in
news:93fkbeFqsU1@mid.individual.net:

> That is an interesting article, but it is a very poorly 'designed'
> .pdf. Very very poor.

Doesn't seem that bad here. I had to increase to 100% to read it without
squinting tho. That's Foxit and firefox...
200% is overkill, my eyes aren't that bad yet.

> It would be easier to read if all of the text were extracted. Or
> perhaps I will see if Calibre can convert the .pdf to something else
> which displays better.

Foxit won't lemme extract the text, but I can always tell firefox I want
to print the document, er to a "text file."


--
Why drink the water from my hand?
Contagious as you think I am
Just tilt my sun towards your domain
Your cup runneth over again