Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Untrusted certificate

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Mike Easter Guest

    Re: Untrusted certificate

    ~BD~ wrote:
    > hxxps://60.251.127.208/general/common/before/en_us/before.html
    >
    > Something for you guys to play with!


    First, where did you get it? Or any part of it?

    Did that come from your opening and reading and pasting from spam for
    E-Detective?



    --
    Mike Easter

  2. #2
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Untrusted certificate

    Mike Easter wrote:
    > ~BD~ wrote:
    >> hxxps://60.251.127.208/general/common/before/en_us/before.html
    >>
    >> Something for you guys to play with!

    >
    > First, where did you get it? Or any part of it?
    >
    > Did that come from your opening and reading and pasting from spam for
    > E-Detective?


    Yes - IIRC it *was* from a SPAM notated post in Hotmail.

  3. #3
    Mike Easter Guest

    Re: Untrusted certificate

    ~BD~ wrote:
    > Mike Easter wrote:


    >> Did that come from your opening and reading and pasting from spam for
    >> E-Detective?

    >
    > Yes - IIRC it *was* from a SPAM notated post in Hotmail.


    I recommend that you cease opening and reading your spam.

    As a general rule, such practice profits the spam process in various
    ways, most of which are unexpected by the foolish spam handler.

    The best way for spam to be 'handled' is for it to be diverted from user
    accessibility by the mail handling processes; preferably by initially
    blocking/preventing its generation into the mail stream, secondarily by
    refusing its acceptance at the server level, tertiarily (new word) by
    the diversion into the spam/junk folder by the mail provider, and as a
    last resort by the user who finds the spam being accessible having the
    *discipline* to go no further in hir reading than to 'see' the
    To/Subject/From, at which time that user /must/ delete the item unopened
    and uninvestigated.

    Experienced anti-spam handlers and spam reporters who are actually doing
    some good about something as opposed to the spammee handlers who profit
    the spam process are to be distinguished from those spam-curious. The
    'rules' of investigation do not include starting the investigation by
    opening the spam like the spamcurious spam-profitting spam opening spam
    reading spamlink clicking spammee who is the 'cause' of spam working
    because it is profitable.


    --
    Mike Easter

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •