Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Server contact lost

  1. #1
    ~BD~ Guest

    Server contact lost

    Hi

    This URL (cached)from Google

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...43/forums.html

    Can anyone reach the *original* 66.39.69.143 site?

  2. #2
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: Server contact lost

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:iq378l$3cn$1@dont-email.me...
    > Hi
    >
    > This URL (cached)from Google
    >
    > http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...43/forums.html
    >
    > Can anyone reach the *original* 66.39.69.143 site?



    Will you stop beating this request of yours to death PLEASE ( sites whose owners
    have requested we not cache their content.)

    Read the following and understand once and for all. Especially the last line

    Cached links that do NOT SHOW
    Google takes a snapshot of each page examined as it crawls the web and caches these
    as a back-up in case the original page is unavailable. If you click on the "Cached"
    link, you will see the web page as it looked when we indexed it. The cached content
    is the content Google uses to judge whether this page is a relevant match for your
    query.

    When the cached page is displayed, it will have a header at the top which serves as
    a reminder that this is not necessarily the most recent version of the page. Terms
    that match your query are highlighted on the cached version to make it easier for
    you to see why your page is relevant.



    *********************************************

    The "Cached" link will be missing for sites that have not been indexed, as well as
    for sites whose owners have requested we not cache their content.

    **************************************

    Peter
    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    http://www.microsoft.com/protect


  3. #3
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Server contact lost

    Peter Foldes failed to answer my straight-forward question - *again*!

    **

    Which was:-

    Can *anyone* reach the *original* http://66.39.69.143 site?

    If not, why might that be?

    --
    Dave - few minutes spare - at a water point (filling with fresh water)

  4. #4
    Mike Easter Guest

    Re: Server contact lost

    ~BD~ wrote:

    > Can *anyone* reach the *original* http://66.39.69.143 site?


    66.39.69.143 is just an IP address in a Pair Networks netblock.

    As you well know, an IP address is not the usual way of running a
    website address for various good reasons.

    Whatever is the back story of why the MVP/DTS-l gang chose/needed to do
    it that way in the past is not worth the energy to grind it out -- but
    that is a subject we have briefly touched on in the past. I seem to
    recall that (it appeared) they didn't own the domain name they would
    have liked to, so they (must have - apparently) decided to do it with an IP.

    These old related MVP sites you are digging up to display/ emphasize/
    underline/ their staleness is not of nearly the interest to others as it
    seems to be to you.

    On this day, there is not a webserver answering port 80 at that IP
    address which IP does not (even) have a rDNS. In addition, there is
    nothing there that echoes pings.

    I would say that 'their' (for some unknown value of 'they') interest in
    maintaining the MVP/DTS-l website's forum with a name OR an IP addressed
    site has waned if not disappeared.



    --
    Mike Easter

  5. #5
    Beauregard T. Shagnasty Guest

    Re: Server contact lost

    ~BD~ wrote:

    > Can *anyone* reach the *original* http://66.39.69.143 site?


    How original must it be? Do you mean via an archive site?
    Otherwise, why are you interested in a site in Pittsburgh?

    > If not, why might that be?


    Your Mac and Skype is infected!!!1!!
    <http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2385044,00.asp>

    --
    -bts
    -May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your narrowboat
    -and sink it in the deepest canal in all of England

  6. #6
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Server contact lost

    Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    > ~BD~ wrote:
    >
    >> Can *anyone* reach the *original* http://66.39.69.143 site?

    >
    > How original must it be? Do you mean via an archive site?
    > Otherwise, why are you interested in a site in Pittsburgh?


    If you paste http://66.39.69.143 into a browser, are you whisked off to
    a URL - or advised 'page not found'?

    >> If not, why might that be?


    Just looking for the truth - nothing else!

    > Your Mac and Skype is infected!!!1!!
    > <http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2385044,00.asp>



    *Far Canal*!!!!

    Good job I'm using Windows right now, eh? 8-)


  7. #7
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: Server contact lost

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:iq4bd6$8jt$1@dont-email.me...

    Peter> If you paste http://66.39.69.143 into a browser, are you whisked off to
    > a URL - or advised 'page not found'?
    >
    >>> If not, why might that be?


    Because you and all your accessibility is banned with any of your IP's that you use.
    Now take that for the answer and stop beating a dead horse.

    Peter

    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    http://www.microsoft.com/protect


  8. #8
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Server contact lost

    Peter Foldes wrote:
    > "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    > news:iq4bd6$8jt$1@dont-email.me...
    >
    > Peter> If you paste http://66.39.69.143 into a browser, are you whisked
    > off to a URL - or advised 'page not found'?


    >> If not, why might that be?

    >
    > Because you and all your accessibility is banned with any of your IP's
    > that you use. Now take that for the answer and stop beating a dead horse.


    So ... does that explanation applies to all others reading here?

  9. #9
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: Server contact lost


    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:iq4f21$300$1@dont-email.me...
    > Peter Foldes wrote:
    >> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    >> news:iq4bd6$8jt$1@dont-email.me...




    >> Because you and all your accessibility is banned with any of your IP's
    >> that you use. Now take that for the answer and stop beating a dead horse.

    >
    > So ... does that explanation applies to all others reading here?


    You should be in the Guinness Book of World Records as the most ignorant and dumb
    person on this planet. Go back to boating and get a life already

    --
    Peter
    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    http://www.microsoft.com/protect


  10. #10
    Dustin Guest

    Re: Server contact lost

    ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
    news:iq378l$3cn$1@dont-email.me:

    > Hi
    >
    > This URL (cached)from Google
    >
    > http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...ttp://66.39.69.
    > 143/forums.html
    >
    > Can anyone reach the *original* 66.39.69.143 site?


    I checked the information records for the IP. What is your interest?


    --
    Why drink the water from my hand?
    Contagious as you think I am
    Just tilt my sun towards your domain
    Your cup runneth over again

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •