Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 77

Thread: Welcome to Computer Haven...

  1. #41
    Dustin Guest

    Re: The truth! :)

    ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in news:iq5j2e$anp$1@dont-email.me:

    > Dustin wrote:
    >> Seems as if 'they' didn't like me using a
    >>> corporate version of Symantec Anti-Virus on a trial basis.

    >
    > BD did, indeed, use a corporate Symantec Anti-Virus product.


    Which you didn't pay for.

    > BD did run a trial of its prowess.


    Which you had no actual right to do.

    > AumHa folk banned me from posting on their forum because of it.


    For using warez openly, sure.

    > No lies at all!


    You didn't have a trial copy. So you did lie.




    --
    Why drink the water from my hand?
    Contagious as you think I am
    Just tilt my sun towards your domain
    Your cup runneth over again

  2. #42
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: The truth! :)

    Peter Foldes wrote:

    > NO. That is not why you were banned. You were warned 2 times before Jim
    > pulled the plug. You did the same there as you do everywhere when you
    > get your hinky feeling (s) about someone (s)


    Your claim is interesting.

    But how can *you* - Peter Foldes - have *any* idea of what *actually*
    occurred? Methinks you are speculating, yet again!

  3. #43
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: The truth! :)

    Dustin wrote:

    > You didn't have a trial copy.


    I did not have a trial copy.

    > So you did lie.


    I did not lie.

    I reported that I carried out a trial using a properly licensed product.

    Such activity is no reason to ban anyone from posting on a forum.

  4. #44
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: The truth! :)

    > But how can *you* - Peter Foldes - have *any* idea of what *actually* occurred?
    > Methinks you are speculating, yet again!


    Crosspoting removed and answered in the other group since this subject has no
    business being posted here

    --
    Peter
    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    http://www.microsoft.com/protect


  5. #45
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: The truth! :)

    Peter Foldes wrote:
    >> But how can *you* - Peter Foldes - have *any* idea of what *actually*
    >> occurred? Methinks you are speculating, yet again!

    >
    > Crosspoting removed and answered in the other group since this subject
    > has no business being posted here
    >


    You really are an arrogant bar steward!

  6. #46
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: The truth! :)

    On Sun, 08 May 2011 17:52:08 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

    > I reported that I carried out a trial using a properly licensed product.


    Licensed to whom?

    > Such activity is no reason to ban anyone from posting on a forum.


    Once you've answered the above question, it's time to deal with that bit.
    Not before.



    --
    “Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, and socialism
    without freedom is slavery and brutality.” -Mikhail Bakunin

  7. #47
    Beauregard T. Shagnasty Guest

    Re: The truth! :)

    ~BD~ wrote:
    [stupid crosspost removed]

    > Dustin wrote:
    >> You didn't have a trial copy.

    >
    > I did not have a trial copy.


    Because there isn't one.

    >> So you did lie.

    >
    > I did not lie.


    You - as usual - sidestep the truth.

    > I reported that I carried out a trial using a properly licensed
    > product.


    Unfortunately, *you* did not own the license! Therein lies the rub.

    > Such activity is no reason to ban anyone from posting on a forum.


    Sure it is, because you are scum.

    --
    -bts
    -May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your narrowboat
    -and sink it in the deepest canal in all of England

  8. #48
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: The truth! :)

    Beauregard T. Shagnasty - fellow scum, wrote:

    > Sure it is, because you are scum.


    I expect that's why *you* are banned from posting on AumHa too, eh?

  9. #49
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: The truth! :)

    Aardvark wrote:
    > On Sun, 08 May 2011 17:52:08 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
    >
    >> I reported that I carried out a trial using a properly licensed product.

    >
    > Licensed to whom?


    One of my Financial Services clients of long ago - now a millionaire!

    >> Such activity is no reason to ban anyone from posting on a forum.

    >
    > Once you've answered the above question, it's time to deal with that bit.
    > Not before.


    Let's just say I became a temporary employee of said client, which thus
    complied with the Symantec license.



  10. #50
    Save_for_l8r Guest

    Re: Ping Jenn: BD lieing, software infringement! Fresh sample 05-07-2011


    I crossposted this reply to alt.politics.scorched-earth as a fresh
    example of BD LIEING for Jenn's benefit and my amusement. Please adjust
    your headers before hitting send!
    *****WARNING*****

    "LIEING"?

    JD




Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •