Ping: David H. Lipman

[~BD~]

@ David H. Lipman

Some questions! (as yet unanswered!)

There was a time when you, DHL, used to publish quite a long list of
URL's - places for folk to visit to get detailed help with interpreting
their HJT logs.

For a long time, you never included www.aumha.net - yet after I
questioned you about same you did, eventually, include Aumha in that list.

This is the relevant URL for Malware removal:-

http://www.aumha.net/viewforum.php?f...t&sd=d&start=0

Do you still publish that list? (If so, where, please?)
Do you still include Aumha in such a listing?
Do you consider Aumha a 'safe' place to visit and advice given there to
be 'sound'?

Original request, here:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...37169365?hl=en

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:YK2dnTgt3ZPCdSbQnZ2dnUVZ8l6dnZ2d@bt.com...
>@ David H. Lipman
>
> Some questions! (as yet unanswered!)
>
> There was a time when you, DHL, used to publish quite a long list of
> URL's - places for folk to visit to get detailed help with interpreting
> their HJT logs.
>
> For a long time, you never included www.aumha.net - yet after I
> questioned you about same you did, eventually, include Aumha in that list.
>
> This is the relevant URL for Malware removal:-
>
> http://www.aumha.net/viewforum.php?f...t&sd=d&start=0
>
> Do you still publish that list? (If so, where, please?)
> Do you still include Aumha in such a listing?
> Do you consider Aumha a 'safe' place to visit and advice given there to
> be 'sound'?
>
> Original request, here:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...37169365?hl=en



David Brooks

Please stop beating a dead horse. There is nothing wrong with and at Aumha aside
from you having been banned from there. You are Trolling and trying to involve good
folks in your stOopid quest to prove Auhma is a bad Organization. Get a life and
move on

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

[G. Morgan]

Peter Foldes disgraced "alt.privacy.spyware" on Sat, 30 Apr 2011
08:42:13 -0400 by spewing:

>You are Trolling and trying to involve good
>folks in your stOopid quest to prove Auhma is a bad Organization.


Is it?

[~BD~]

On 30/04/2011 13:42, Peter Foldes wrote:
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in message
> news:YK2dnTgt3ZPCdSbQnZ2dnUVZ8l6dnZ2d@bt.com...
>> @ David H. Lipman
>>
>> Some questions! (as yet unanswered!)
>>
>> There was a time when you, DHL, used to publish quite a long list of
>> URL's - places for folk to visit to get detailed help with interpreting
>> their HJT logs.
>>
>> For a long time, you never included www.aumha.net - yet after I
>> questioned you about same you did, eventually, include Aumha in that
>> list.
>>
>> This is the relevant URL for Malware removal:-
>>
>> http://www.aumha.net/viewforum.php?f...t&sd=d&start=0
>>
>> Do you still publish that list? (If so, where, please?)
>> Do you still include Aumha in such a listing?
>> Do you consider Aumha a 'safe' place to visit and advice given there to
>> be 'sound'?
>>
>> Original request, here:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...37169365?hl=en
>>
>
>
>
> David Brooks
>
> Please stop beating a dead horse. There is nothing wrong with and at
> Aumha aside from you having been banned from there. You are Trolling and
> trying to involve good folks in your stOopid quest to prove Auhma is a
> bad Organization. Get a life and move on
>

What I have been doing is trying to assess *the truth* - bad *or* good!

My question was directed to Mr Lipman - WTF has it got to do with you?

Some might think you have some sort of vested interest. Have you?

[Mike Easter]

~BD~ wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>> "~BD~"
>>> @ David H. Lipman

> My question was directed to Mr Lipman - WTF has it got to do with you?

It doesn't work like that.

When you post a public message, it is a message broadcast to the public
for public consumption. Anyone can comment on it - how it is a stupid
or impertinent question - or what the answer to the question is - or
some other observation about the quality or integrity of your message.

Putting someone's name or handle in the subject or 'at' function does
not construct a 'wall' around your message restricting it to just that
name or handle's attention.


--
Mike Easter

[~BD~]

On 30/04/2011 16:24, Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>> "~BD~"
>>>> @ David H. Lipman
>
>> My question was directed to Mr Lipman - WTF has it got to do with you?
>
> It doesn't work like that.
>
> When you post a public message, it is a message broadcast to the public
> for public consumption. Anyone can comment on it - how it is a stupid or
> impertinent question - or what the answer to the question is - or some
> other observation about the quality or integrity of your message.
>
> Putting someone's name or handle in the subject or 'at' function does
> not construct a 'wall' around your message restricting it to just that
> name or handle's attention.
>
>

Understood. Thank you for reminding me, Mike!

In Message-ID: <inin6u$ag0$1@speranza.aioe.org>

This is what Foldes said .........

"I post and have been posting in Aumha *since it's inception* along with
other news group servers. I was around when you joined us at Aumha and I
was sure around when you pulled the terrorist and bad guy routine there.
You also did the same at Annex and with AOL. Go and screw yourself
David. You do not know me as you think you do. I on the other hand do
know you since I have a lot of advantage over knowing you which you have
not even dreamed about."

*

BD was/is fascinated by that last sentence!

FYI http://classic-web.archive.org/web/*...rum.aumha.org/

[Mike Easter]

~BD~ wrote:

> This is what Foldes said .........

What you should do about whatever Foldes posts (for your consumption) is
either -1- algorithmically ignore it or -2- first take 10 deep breaths,
a nap, a chill pill, and then mentally ignore it.

Some things rattle your cage. You should avoid them.

--
Mike Easter

[~BD~]

On 30/04/2011 16:41, Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> This is what Foldes said .........
>
> What you should do about whatever Foldes posts (for your consumption) is
> either -1- algorithmically ignore it or -2- first take 10 deep breaths,
> a nap, a chill pill, and then mentally ignore it.
>
> Some things rattle your cage. You should avoid them.
>



I've been really pleased that you have been keeping an eye out for me, Mike.

In *your* expert, unbiased, opinion - has Aumha been 'take over' and/or
abandoned by the original site owner?

[Mike Easter]

~BD~ wrote:

> In *your* expert, unbiased, opinion - has Aumha been 'take over' and/or
> abandoned by the original site owner?

I don't pay any attention to what is going on at aumha, so I have no
idea or concept of whatever it is you are talking about nor any interest
in finding out. It is completely unimportant to me.

Perhaps it would be better if you tuned it out of your consciousness as
well. Clearly you would be better off for that.


--
Mike Easter

[Polk Salad]

In article <KZydnRKddPperCHQnZ2dnUVZ7v2dnZ2d@bt.com>, ~BD~@nomail.afraid.com
says...
>
>
>On 30/04/2011 16:41, Mike Easter wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> This is what Foldes said .........
>>
>> What you should do about whatever Foldes posts (for your consumption) is
>> either -1- algorithmically ignore it or -2- first take 10 deep breaths,
>> a nap, a chill pill, and then mentally ignore it.
>>
>> Some things rattle your cage. You should avoid them.
>>
>
>
>
>I've been really pleased that you have been keeping an eye out for me, Mike.
>
>In *your* expert, unbiased, opinion - has Aumha been 'take over' and/or
>abandoned by the original site owner?

Row, row, row your boat. Tomorrow is Sunday!
Does that mean we get a day of rest?