G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> You all know what BD is thinking! ;-)
>
> See this? http://ca.linkedin.com/in/randyknobloch
>
No, I hadn't. Thanks.
Interesting that his photograph on Linkedin appears to be *exactly* the
same photo as the one that has been removed here!
http://i56.tinypic.com/smge3s.jpg
~BD~ wrote:
> You all know what BD is thinking! ;-)
I do not have a clue. I cannot link together that stream of unrelated
pastings.
--
Mike Easter
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> You all know what BD is thinking! ;-)
>
> I do not have a clue. I cannot link together that stream of unrelated
> pastings.
>
>
There are no "pastings".
The implication *should* have been crystal clear to a fellow like you!
~BD~ wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> You all know what BD is thinking! ;-)
>>
>> I do not have a clue. I cannot link together that stream of unrelated
>> pastings.
>>
>>
>
> There are no "pastings".
Yes there are. A pasting is a function of your computer copying and
pasting from one place to another.
> The implication *should* have been crystal clear to a fellow like you!
No. Your brain's thinking processes aren't typical - one might say not
'normal'.
I wouldn't want my brain to follow or 'see' the loose (and
inappropriate) associations which are manufactured in your mind.
So, if BD is thinking something which he wishes to convey to others, he
should just spit it - a specific idea or notion - out and not allude to it.
--
Mike Easter
~BD~ wrote:
> You all know what BD is thinking! ;-)
For example, it would be zany for BD to be 'thinking' that PF =
siljaline = Randy Knobloch because of the Montreal 'connection'.
People who do identity sleuthing and draw false ridiculous conclusions
are nuts.
For BD to think that other people should be 'following' his thinking is
also nuts.
Ergo, BD is illustrating one variety (or perhaps two) of his nuttiness
in this thread.
--
Mike Easter
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> You all know what BD is thinking! ;-)
>
> For example, it would be zany for BD to be 'thinking' that PF =
> siljaline = Randy Knobloch because of the Montreal 'connection'.
>
> People who do identity sleuthing and draw false ridiculous conclusions
> are nuts.
Only if they are wrong! You don't *know* that I'm wrong. ;-)
> For BD to think that other people should be 'following' his thinking is
> also nuts.
I'm aware that not all knives in a drawer are always sharp!
> Ergo, BD is illustrating one variety (or perhaps two) of his nuttiness
> in this thread.
You failed to mention *the German connection*!
What is *your* explanation for the removal of said 'siljaline' from the
AumHa page?
Some evidence for your own eyes: http://i56.tinypic.com/smge3s.jpg
--
Dave - I admit that I don't have the skill to manipulate the screenshot!
~BD~ wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> You all know what BD is thinking! ;-)
>>
>> I do not have a clue. I cannot link together that stream of unrelated
>> pastings.
>>
>>
>
> There are no "pastings".
>
> The implication *should* have been crystal clear to a fellow like you!
All I got from it is that you're a stalker.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> You all know what BD is thinking! ;-)
"What can I do today to cast more aspersions and innuendos toward my
fellow posters and other people I don't know, and what can I add to my
personal dossiers of these people?"
>>> I do not have a clue. I cannot link together that stream of
>>> unrelated pastings.
>>
>> There are no "pastings".
>>
>> The implication *should* have been crystal clear to a fellow like
>> you!
>
> All I got from it is that you're a stalker.
...especially of people associated with that Auhma place. He is truly an
obsessed stalker.
--
-bts
-This poast is valid through December 21, 2012
Beauregard T. Shagnasty bleated but offered no explanation.
> ..especially of people associated with that Auhma place. He is truly an
> obsessed stalker.
>
I'm happy to listen to your explanation of *why* siljaline's details
have been removed. <ird61e$ak7$1@dont-email.me>
~BD~ wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty bleated but offered no explanation.
Why don't you understand that nobody cares? I certainly don't.
>> ..especially of people associated with that Auhma place. He is truly
>> an obsessed stalker.
>
> I'm happy to listen to your explanation of *why* siljaline's details
> have been removed.
Why are you so obsessed with it? Go get a real life, stalker!
--
-bts
-May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your narrowboat
-and sink it in the deepest canal in all of England
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote