VanguardLH wrote:
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
>> VanguardLH wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I see how detailed you were in showing how to trace the
>>> delivery of an e-mail without the appropriate headers in the
>>> exhibit.
>>
>> As if headers cannot be forged.
>
> Not once it is past the e-mail server under the control of the
> phisher. That's why you trace backwards and watch out for bogus
> headers inserted by the phisher. Spend some time in the Spamcop
> newsgroup or forums to get a feel on how to decipher the headers.
>
>> In other words, the headers are useless to the purpose of
>> determining the legitimacy of the email.
>
> Yeah, sure, we believe you. They mean absolutely nothing, uh huh.
> The source of an e-mail is never relevant to its content, yeah, right.
>
>>> If you don't have anything relevant to contribute, why do you post?
>
> Your reply (to me) was even less "relevant" than my reply to the OP
> (to get more info to allow tracing the routing of the e-mail -
> something only you claim is not relevant).

<plonk>