Just got it.
Buffalo
Just got it.
Buffalo
Buffalo wrote:
> Just got it.
It's fairly easy to determine what the new database is, when you've downloaded the new
database, before you enable all new protection, look at the numbers as to what you are
*not* protected against, that makes for an update post
As such ....
14281 total items in database | 56 New | 22 new IE ClSID's | 34 New Restricted Site entries
for IE | No new items for Mozilla.
Silj
--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
siljaline wrote:
> Buffalo wrote:
>> Just got it.
>
> It's fairly easy to determine what the new database is, when you've
> downloaded the new
> database, before you enable all new protection, look at the numbers
> as to what you are
> *not* protected against, that makes for an update post
>
> As such ....
>
> 14281 total items in database | 56 New | 22 new IE ClSID's | 34 New
> Restricted Site entries
> for IE | No new items for Mozilla.
>
> Silj
I knew you would do it.
Buffalo
PS: I just wanted to alert those that had the free version that there was an
update.
Buffalo wrote:
> I knew you would do it.
Aha![]()
> PS: I just wanted to alert those that had the free version that there was an
> update.
That works for me.
Regards,
Silj
--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
siljaline wrote:
> Buffalo wrote:
>> Just got it.
>
> It's fairly easy to determine what the new database is, when you've
> downloaded the new
> database, before you enable all new protection, look at the numbers
> as to what you are
> *not* protected against, that makes for an update post
>
> As such ....
>
> 14281 total items in database | 56 New | 22 new IE ClSID's | 34 New
> Restricted Site entries
> for IE | No new items for Mozilla.
>
> Silj
Do you still think SB is usefull when using FF ?
Buffalo
PS: There seems to be almost no new items ever added for it.
Buffalo wrote:
<snip>
> Do you still think SB is usefull when using FF ?
Yes to that and there are so many add-on widgets for FF that you
cannot use on IE.
Some examples >
(https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir...vacy-security/)
> PS: There seems to be almost no new items ever added for it.
I do notice this as well as I do use FF as a back-up Browser.
Sign-up ! Let your thoughts be known.
(http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
Silj
--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
siljaline wrote:
> Buffalo wrote:
> <snip>
>> Do you still think SB is usefull when using FF ?
>
> Yes to that and there are so many add-on widgets for FF that you
> cannot use on IE.
> Some examples >
> (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir...vacy-security/)
>
>> PS: There seems to be almost no new items ever added for it.
>
> I do notice this as well as I do use FF as a back-up Browser.
>
> Sign-up ! Let your thoughts be known.
> (http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
>
> Silj
As always, your comments and suggestions are among the very best.
Buffalo
Buffalo wrote:
<snip>
> As always, your comments and suggestions are among the very best.
Thank you for the tip of the Hat !! It is appreciated more than you know.
Silj
--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)