Phishing warnings

[~BD~]

On 08/04/2011 16:45, FromTheRafters wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:34:10 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Would not such warnings not be helpful in alerting you (and others) to
>> possible danger?
>
> No.
>
> Err ... and not no (i.e., yes) they would not be not helpful in alerting
> others, but for 'and me' they would indeed be not helpful but rather an
> annoyance.
>
> So, no - because of the implied 'and me' and possibly not no otherwise.
>

That took a bit of deliberation, did it not? ;-)

I shouldn't not concentrate .... mix computing with decorating!

[FromTheRafters]

On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:48:54 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> On 08/04/2011 16:45, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:34:10 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Would not such warnings not be helpful in alerting you (and others) to
>>> possible danger?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> Err ... and not no (i.e., yes) they would not be not helpful in
>> alerting others, but for 'and me' they would indeed be not helpful but
>> rather an annoyance.
>>
>> So, no - because of the implied 'and me' and possibly not no otherwise.
>>
>>
> That took a bit of deliberation, did it not? ;-)

Yes, it certainly did not not take a bit of doing.

> I shouldn't not concentrate .... mix computing with decorating!

)