Aardvark wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:38:45 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> On 03/04/2011 15:12, Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:45:05 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 03/04/2011 13:10, Bullwinkle wrote:
>>>>> Why don't you ask?
>>>>
>>>> Ah! Good question!
>>>>
>>>> My friend went there recently.
>>>>
>>>> After his visit he encountered a problem with his computer!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No, he didn't, and you give a very good hint at what most probably
>>> caused the problem in your next paragraph:
>>
>> Yes - he did!
>>
>
> The two events aren't necessarily connected. In fact, I suspect they
> aren't.
Well I'm pleased that *you* suffered from no ill effects after *your* visit!
There again, maybe you didn't actually make a post there on U2U.
>>>> When he tried to switch off his machine before going to bed, he got a
>>>> message saying that an update needed to be installed - he OK'd that
>>>> and went to bed. Next morning, evidently, when he looked at his
>>>> computer he was dismayed to find that it had *still* not shut down!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So, as often happens, a Windoze update b0rked something.
>>
>> The thing was, according to Belarc Advisor, his computer was *already*
>> up-to-date as far as Windows updates were concerned.
>
> Means nothing.
I see.
>> As you know, I'm
>> sure, such updates are issued on the second Tuesday of each month
>> (almost always) - well removed from when this occurred!
>>
>
> And, occasionally, critical security updates are offered for download on
> whatever day they become available.
Indeed - as I said, "almost always!
>>>> Fortunately, he had Acronis installed, so was quickly able to restore
>>>> his computer to how it had been - to a point before he had visited
>>>> Annexcafe User2User.
>>>>
>>>> Methinks he'll not go *there* again for help with his computer!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What about the next time he downloads that update?
>>
>> There was *no* official 'update' relevant at that time!
>>
>
> See above re 'critical security updates'.
See above re 'almost always'.
D.


Reply With Quote