"FredW" wrote in message news:kcu9p6hl67f46gpsq5fgc6m22r4hgpk2uk@4ax.com...

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:50:34 +0100, "Mr. Slow"
<millenniumgold@btinternet.invalid> wrote:
>
>Thank you but with respect, one can either nit-pick over obscure Usenet
>protocols which few understand, or comment on the (quite serious) subject
>matter. I (and the previous posters) would prefer the latter, you the
>former.

O please, do yourself and everybody else a favor and get rid of WLM 2011
(WLM 15).

Look at the post you wrote and see that it is not possible to see where
the previous post ends and where your reply begins.
That is called "quoting" which is not done by your WLM.
Other deficiencies of WLM are already mentioned by Vanguard.
Why don't you read and accept the failures of WLM?

It is not "nit-picking" but it is rude to use such a sloppy product.
If you really want to use WLM, please go back to WLM 2009.
WLM 2011 is the worst product from Microsoft in many years.

--
Fred W. (NL)

Bull****. If you have an issue with WLM, refer it to Microsoft not me. I am
not a rude person but hate to see legitimate spyware discussions derailed in
this way.

What's more important? The suggestion that Samsung may be distributing new
laptops with key loggers and rootkits installed, or some suggestions that
WLM misquotes postings (which anyone with half a brain can sort out anyway)?
I know here my money is . . .