Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: =?windows-1252?Q?=95=95=95=95=95=95=3E_Privacy_Statement_Int ernational_?==?windows-1252?Q?Rollformms_Inc=2E?=

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    VanguardLH Guest

    Re: =?us-ascii?Q?=95=95=95=95=95=95=3E_Privacy_Statement?== ?us-ascii?Q?_International_Rollformms_Inc=2E?=

    David H. Lipman wrote:

    > From: "internationalxxxxforms"
    >
    >| International xxxxforms Incorporated is a company that respects the
    >| privacy of the users of the International xxxxforms Incorporated
    >| website. We recognize and acknowledge the vital importance of
    >| continuously protecting the privacy of our web visitors.
    >
    > But...
    > You'll habe no problems bew a jerkoff Googler Grouper spammer !


    Oh, you really thought a spammer using Google Groups would really see
    your response? Bwaahaahaahaahaa! They don't come here to read posts.
    They just dump their turds here. You're stomping on the litter after
    the litterer is long gone. Just blanket delete all Google Groups posts.
    Between the spammers and severe ignorants that post from there, you
    won't miss the dearth of remaining worthwhile posts.

    So why haven't you yet added Google Groupers to your killfile list?
    Yes, you're still using Outlook Express which won't let you test on the
    Message-ID header; however, that doesn't prevent you from incorporating
    a proxy to overcome OE's deficiencies, like nFilter (aka NewsProxy), to
    tag when the MID contains "googlegroups.com" and use a rule back in OE
    to delete/hide the tagged posts.

  2. #2
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: ••••••> Privacy Statement International Rollformms Inc.

    From: "VanguardLH" <V@nguard.LH>

    | David H. Lipman wrote:

    >> From: "internationalxxxxforms"


    >>| International xxxxforms Incorporated is a company that respects the
    >>| privacy of the users of the International xxxxforms Incorporated
    >>| website. We recognize and acknowledge the vital importance of
    >>| continuously protecting the privacy of our web visitors.


    >> But...
    >> You'll habe no problems bew a jerkoff Googler Grouper spammer !


    | Oh, you really thought a spammer using Google Groups would really see
    | your response? Bwaahaahaahaahaa! They don't come here to read posts.
    | They just dump their turds here. You're stomping on the litter after
    | the litterer is long gone. Just blanket delete all Google Groups posts.
    | Between the spammers and severe ignorants that post from there, you
    | won't miss the dearth of remaining worthwhile posts.

    | So why haven't you yet added Google Groupers to your killfile list?
    | Yes, you're still using Outlook Express which won't let you test on the
    | Message-ID header; however, that doesn't prevent you from incorporating
    | a proxy to overcome OE's deficiencies, like nFilter (aka NewsProxy), to
    | tag when the MID contains "googlegroups.com" and use a rule back in OE
    | to delete/hide the tagged posts.

    Some google groupers do read replies because they don't know hat Usenet spamming is or
    don't think what THEY DID was Usenet spam.

    As for killfiles, I rarely use them. If I did a regular expression on *ALL* Google
    Groupers would be used.

    --
    Dave
    Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •