On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:52:31 -0500, "siljaline" <spam@uce.gov> wrote:

>Autumn wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 09:37:37 -0500, "siljaline" <spam@uce.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>Running Avira perhaps ?
>>>(http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=288444)
>>>
>>>Silj
>>
>> Thanks for posting this, Silj. I have the problem. Avira seems to be
>> a bit slow regarding posting a hotfix. Perhaps, as suggested in the
>> link, they should revert back to the previous engine until they
>> (Avira) can get this figured out.
>
>If whatever Avira suggests I would go with that in the interim, Autumn.
>AV Support in situations where they are in damage control can be funky.
>
>Best of luck !
>
>Silj

Silj,

Isn't there a certain amount of redundancy in running Spywareblaster
and a Hosts file? So, if one lets Avira run the way it is...with SWB
at least partially running...wouldn't one be better off?. I don't
feel comfortable unchecking the protection the Avira temporary
solution suggests.