Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> The FUD-Spreader named ~BD~ wrote:

Provocation?

>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.com>
>>>> [6-yr-old copyrighted material was snipped by Mr Lipman]

Provocation?

>>> The word is compromised.
>>> Being infected does not necessarily mean the platform has been compromised.

Now was *that* provocative, or what!

>> If one needs to resort to utilising David H Lipman's "Multi-AV Scanning
>> Tool" would one's machine have merely been 'infected' or would it have
>> been 'compromised'?
>
> One's machine would not be affected at all, and you know it. Can you
> ever post anything without attempting to provoke someone? Other than
> that woman, of course.
>

Maybe it's because you are an American that you cannot understand
English 'as she is wrote', eh? Perhaps a simple misunderstanding?

No-one (except me! I have tried it out! <smile>) would use Mr Lipman's
tool _in anger_ *unless* their computer had been /either/ infected *or*
compromised, would they?

It was a *serious* question (OK - with an undertone, I concede!)

Now then, have you been snooping and disrupting play on Scorched-Earth
using a different nym? You are more than welcome to join in as BTS!