Dealing with Unwanted Spyware and Parasites

[~BD~]

Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Btw, I don't know about the 'markers' you mentioned.
>
> There are switches to turn on and off a quote <q> </q> which can also be
> used to turn on and off sarcasm or TIC tongueincheek <TIC> </TIC>.
>
> Of course, I also believe that you can't just use TIC or even OMG omigod
> on the assumption that everyone knows what that means.
>
> I believe that ambiguity and other lack of clarity and understanding are
> a big big problem in this type of medium exchange, and so therefore
> everyone should go to a little extra trouble to make themselves
> perfectly clear.

<TIC> You almost always make yourself absolutely clear, Mike! </TIC>

Hahaha! You do, actually!

> It isn't that much trouble to spellout some quaint abbreviation, such as
> IAWTP Iagreewiththispost
>

Thanks. When stuck, I invariably resort to the Urban dictionary!
http://www.urbandictionary.com/

[Mike Easter]

~BD~ wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:

>> It isn't that much trouble to spellout some quaint abbreviation, such as
>> IAWTP Iagreewiththispost
>>
>
> Thanks. When stuck, I invariably resort to the Urban dictionary!
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/

No. That dictionary isn't a good one, especially for usenet
abbreviations. That urbandictionary is more like a blog-wiki where
people get to use/enter their own definitions for things.

In this specific example, there are 4 entries by various people, one of
whom/which is correct, one of whom/which is 'half' correct and half
zany, and two of which are totally zany.

That isn't my idea of a good resource. You might compare it to BD
getting advice from PF about something.


--
Mike Easter

[~BD~]

Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>
>>> It isn't that much trouble to spellout some quaint abbreviation, such as
>>> IAWTP Iagreewiththispost
>>>
>>
>> Thanks. When stuck, I invariably resort to the Urban dictionary!
>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/
>
> No. That dictionary isn't a good one, especially for usenet
> abbreviations. That urbandictionary is more like a blog-wiki where
> people get to use/enter their own definitions for things.
>
> In this specific example, there are 4 entries by various people, one of
> whom/which is correct, one of whom/which is 'half' correct and half
> zany, and two of which are totally zany.

I actually agree - but it *has* helped me!

> That isn't my idea of a good resource. You might compare it to BD
> getting advice from PF about something.

You really lift my spirits, Mike! Thanks!

D.

[Dustin]

Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in
news:G4aKo.106$II4.74@newsfe22.ams2:

> On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:12:13 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>
>> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:id8e62$ird$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>
>>> And as usual I will continue to post and try to help others with
>>> computer related issues as I have been doing since 1993
>>
>> Your not much better than BD... Try helping yourself, fix your damn
>> client; It's not wordwrapping for ****.
>
> Foldes reckons that it's my client that's at fault. He's such a
> ****ing expert that he just *has* to be right,
>
> If his posts aren't wrapping in your client, it must definitely be
> the fault of this here Pan 0.133 I'm running here.

Possibly, if I was using the same software and configuration; obviously
I'm not and this entire response is meant in a joking fashion.

> Don't blame Foldes, blame me.

Fork me a new blue dew, then.


--
Hackers are generally only very weakly motivated by conventional
rewards such as social approval or money. They tend to be attracted by
challenges and excited by interesting toys, and to judge the interest
of work or other activities in terms of the challenges offered and the
toys they get to play with.

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in
news:ks2dnR6xJMNgB2XRnZ2dnUVZ8gmdnZ2d@bt.com:

> 100% correct! Here's a positive reference so there can be *no*
> dispute.

I didn't think you'd be able to dispute something that was written by
you with verifable headers.

> Message ID <uf6dnfDt-LfgU0DWnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d@bt.com>
>
> You obviously have the same problem as Foldes in getting a Message
> ID from your personal server!

You would be incorrect. Evidently, you can't read well. I already said
I would provide the message ID if you still denied the post existed;
but to show you I wasn't BSing about it, I provided a snippit of that
post for you refresh your memory; I don't want you being able to say
you "forgot." Spin your way out of that, BD.

>>> I will respond to you IDC, Dustin.
>>
>> I'm looking forward to reading your excuse for commiting criminal
>> computer trespass and abuse of services. Surely you have a good and
>> noble reason to abuse malwarebytes in such a fashion?
>
> You 'forgot' to mention the other part of that post, in which I said

I didn't forget to mention anything. Your selfish reason for doing it
has no relevence. You are commiting criminal computer trespass and
abuse/theft of services you aren't authorized to access. And you *know*
this, for an absolute fact. You wouldn't have a viable defense in an
American Court.

> It was also in the Honorary Members group which is not, as far as
> I'm aware, accessible by the general public or children."

You would be wrong. Anyone could at that time achieve honorary member
status with a certain number of posts. You simply reached the
requirement.

> Now Mr Cook, if you review recent correspondence between us, you
> will determine that I had not denied I made that comment. You
> interpreted things that way! When you eventually understand that I
> tell the truth, we'll get on fine, I'm sure!

You inferred that you might? not have made the post, or that I may be
making it up. When you asked for the Message ID; You incorrectly
assumed I'd be unable to provide the message for evidence. This is
simply your way of trying to spin it into something it wasn't. Typical,
for a dishonest piece of **** like yourself.

> Here is a past PM conversation:

You post private messages, as well.. Just another example of why and
how your such an awful piece of ****.

> I had hoped you would take the place of Paul, Dustin - simply check.

I'm checking you out, BD. Thoroughly, son. I intend to put it all to
very good use.


--
Hackers are generally only very weakly motivated by conventional
rewards such as social approval or money. They tend to be attracted by
challenges and excited by interesting toys, and to judge the interest
of work or other activities in terms of the challenges offered and the
toys they get to play with.

[Peter Foldes]

"Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9E42CE9262A40HHI2948AJD832@no...
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:id8e62$ird$1@speranza.aioe.org:


"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:id8e62$ird$1@speranza.aioe.org:

> And as usual I will continue to post and try to help others with
> computer related issues as I have been doing since 1993

Your not much better than BD... Try helping yourself, fix your damn
client; It's not wordwrapping for ****.


How is it now Dustin ??? Took out UTF- 8 and back to Western European

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:23:13 -0800, Mike Easter wrote:

> If they did converse, I'm sure it resulted in PF recommending that
> everyone get a newsreader which works just like OE.

How old were you when you first noticed that you had psychic powers, Mike?



--

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:24:10 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:

> "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9E42CE9262A40HHI2948AJD832@no...
>> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:id8e62$ird$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:id8e62$ird$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>
>> And as usual I will continue to post and try to help others with
>> computer related issues as I have been doing since 1993
>
> Your not much better than BD... Try helping yourself, fix your damn
> client; It's not wordwrapping for ****.
>
>
> How is it now Dustin ??? Took out UTF- 8 and back to Western European

How the **** would you doing something to the configuration of your
client make any difference (which it has), if it was my ****ing client at
fault?



--

[Aardvark]

On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 03:25:24 +0000, Aardvark wrote:

> On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:24:10 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:
>
>> "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9E42CE9262A40HHI2948AJD832@no...
>>> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:id8e62$ird$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>
>>
>> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:id8e62$ird$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>
>>> And as usual I will continue to post and try to help others with
>>> computer related issues as I have been doing since 1993
>>
>> Your not much better than BD... Try helping yourself, fix your damn
>> client; It's not wordwrapping for ****.
>>
>>
>> How is it now Dustin ??? Took out UTF- 8 and back to Western European
>
> How the **** would you doing something to the configuration of your
> client make any difference (which it has), if it was my ****ing client
> at fault?

Of course, the true results won't be seen until you make a post or reply
containing a few long sentences.



--

[Peter Foldes]

"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message news:EwiKo.4813$II4.2875@newsfe22.ams2...
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:24:10 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:
>
>> "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9E42CE9262A40HHI2948AJD832@no...
>>> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:id8e62$ird$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>
>>
>> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:id8e62$ird$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>
>>> And as usual I will continue to post and try to help others with
>>> computer related issues as I have been doing since 1993
>>
>> Your not much better than BD... Try helping yourself, fix your damn
>> client; It's not wordwrapping for ****.
>>
>>
>> How is it now Dustin ??? Took out UTF- 8 and back to Western European
>
> How the **** would you doing something to the configuration of your
> client make any difference (which it has), if it was my ****ing client at
> fault?

Aardvark

Because I forgot to change it back from posting in the MS Forums. This server does not like the UTF-8 Encoding on OE but it likes Western European.

My bad and I deserved the ****.

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect