In article <ic6iaf$sf0$1@news.albasani.net>, V@nguard.LH says...
>
>
>Polk Salad wrote:
>
>> Anymore every time I come here ususally half the posts are m bunch of
>> "BD" drivel. He's always starting subjects about crap just to try and
>> make people thinks he knows something about anything. And the worst part
>> of it is that the regulars who "do" know something keep feeding him. Now
>> he's flaming and cross posting crap about people lying and all the other
>> usuall bull****. It is not even good entertainment anymore.
>> Damn, I wish he'd just automagically go away!
>
>http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/software/winvn/winvn.html
>
>As I recall when I looked before, that newsreader sucks. Nothing at
>http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/software.../wvnguide.html about
>defining rules or filters. That means you will waste time with lots of
>posts that are spam, trolls, ranting children, diary entries, off-topic
>posts, malcontents, cross-posts to flame or garbage groups, fanatics
>(religious, Windows, Linux, etc), and other undesirable posts or the
>sources for them. You can't even filter out the Google Groupers to get
>rid of the major source of Usenet spam. Start reconsidering what
>newsreader you use to participate in Usenet.
>
>You're screwed until you get a newsreader where you can define rules to
>filter out the noise.
Don't worry. I just use this antique for a little anonymity!
I am pretty much of a regular here and I really don't want to get on "his"
list.. :-)
Yes, WinVn sucks. But back when I started out, that's about all there was. I
don't remember if Outlook Express even did news back then. But then that
would *really* be as low as you could go.


Reply With Quote