Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: david brooks AKA boaterdave from Devon area

  1. #11
    Jenn Guest

    Re: Would YOU sign these terms?!!!

    ~BD~ wrote:
    > Aardvark wrote:
    >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:32:40 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:
    >>
    >>> BD
    >>>
    >>> That is the link you were posting back in 08.

    >>
    >> Can you prove that assertion? Like, provide a link or MID or
    >> whatever? No? Then STFU with your ****ing lies.
    >>
    >>> Bully

    >>
    >> I take it you're referring to the coward of many nyms which hides
    >> behind x-privat.org.
    >>
    >>> just brought it to
    >>> your attention that it was you who posted that link originally
    >>> stating that it was you who helped build it.

    >>
    >> And you know exactly what goes on in what passes for the brain of
    >> said coward. I wonder why.
    >>
    >>> What a 2 faced screwed up Troll you
    >>> are
    >>>

    >>
    >> PKB.
    >>
    >>> And now you want to wash your hands from it. You are a real sick
    >>> ****up

    >>
    >> PKB X 2


    > Might Aardvark and BD end up becoming *real* friends?!!!


    He just more or less compared you to be the same as PF (PKB)...


    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)



  2. #12
    ~BD~ Guest

    The start! February 2006

    Jenn wrote:

    > He just more or less compared you to be the same as PF (PKB)...


    Maybe - maybe not!

    I've NO CLUE as to what reference Mr Foldes was trying to give to
    Aardvark - all seems fine to me. If you think he's actually provided
    something involving me with a pornographic site(s) please email me Jenn.
    Thanks.

    Here's where things started really.

    http://groups.google.com/group/micro...+I+believe%3F#


    An extract
    **********

    Karl's correct, but I would still applaud BoaterDave for his concern.
    Unless you have a pretty good understanding of URL formats, and the way
    they are processed, anything more complex than
    http://www.example.com/directoryname/filename.html should be treated as
    suspicious.

    It's a sad fact that Microsoft have these sesquipedalien links for their
    downloads, that look oh-so-similar to the similarly obfuscated links
    that are used by phishers to confuse their targets, through public
    redirectors (Yahoo is the most frequent example I've seen in the past)
    and the like. I understand why this happens - because it's easier for
    Microsoft to automate - but it is a mess of code that helps cause the
    confusion that phishers take advantage of.

    It's easier to trust the http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=4538415 links,
    because you can retype those. [Links that you can type into the browser
    yourself are much safer than those that you click - there's always the
    possibility of a "homograph attack" - something that looks like an 'o',
    for instance, but isn't the same code to the computer.]
    Does that mean it's safe to trust the http://www.************ links? No,
    because tinyurl is a public service, that anyone can post a good or bad
    link to.

    So, BoaterDave, maintain that paranoia and distrust of things you don't
    understand - and build up some trust for people who understand more than
    you.

    Alun.
    ~~~~
    [Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.]
    --
    Texas Imperial Software | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email
    23921 57th Ave SE | a...@wftpd.com.
    Washington WA 98072-8661 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers.
    Fax/Voice +1(425)807-1787 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.


    **********************************

    The same thread in an easier to read format here:-

    http://www.webservertalk.com/archive...2-1403474.html

    HTH

    Dave

  3. #13
    John Doe Guest

    Re: The start! February 2006

    On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:31:33 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:

    > Jenn wrote:
    >
    >> He just more or less compared you to be the same as PF (PKB)...

    >
    > Maybe - maybe not!
    >
    > I've NO CLUE


    A TRUER STATEMENT HAS NEVER BEEN MADE!!!!!

    Kwitcher damn stupid cross-posting, you moron.

  4. #14
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: Would YOU sign these terms?!!!

    On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:08:43 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:

    >> Can you prove that assertion? Like, provide a link or MID or whatever?

    >
    >
    > Crosspost removed
    >
    > Aardvark
    >
    > Here you go
    >
    > "~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    > news:eTCBsyIMJHA.2036@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...


    That's not a complete MID, ****wit.



    --
    "En un lugar de la Mancha, de cuyo nombre no quiero acordarme,
    no hace mucho tiempo que vivĂ*a un hidalgo de los de lanza en
    astillero, adarga antigua, rocĂ*n flaco y galgo corredor."
    -Cervantes, 'Don Quixote'

  5. #15
    StevieO Guest

    Re: Would YOU sign these terms?!!!

    Why waste your time.

    Moocher and fatt jenn are in the tank for bd.

    He probably pays them and the bunny dude.


    "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:ic7aj0$7o7$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    > Can you prove that assertion? Like, provide a link or MID or whatever?



    Crosspost removed

    Aardvark

    Here you go

    "~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message
    news:eTCBsyIMJHA.2036@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...


    --
    Peter
    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    http://www.microsoft.com/protect


  6. #16
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: Would YOU sign these terms?!!!

    On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:18:04 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:

    > Aardvark
    >
    > And if you need further proof you can ask anyone on Annex including MS
    > MVP's to this fact.


    Still no MID, eh, ****wit? No cite.

    You make all these assertions and accusations with nothing but your sock-
    puppets to back up what you have to say.

    You're a ****ing joke.

    > Mr. Dave did a PcButts
    > a couple of times.


    What? Stole someone else's code and used it as his own? Don't make me
    laugh.

    > He is a 2 faced person trying to act the good boy.


    I've never found him to be anything other than straightforward, if a
    little misguided and slow to understand some things. You, on the other
    hand...

    > You have no idea what this person did in the newsgroups from 2005-2008
    > and now hiding under skirts..
    >


    Well then, why not provide some meat to the bones you're throwing about-
    y'know, like MIDs and other citation material. Until you do, then shut
    the **** up.

    > Do not want to take my word for this.


    If you promised me that the sun would rise in the East tomorrow morning
    I'd stay up all night just to make sure by witnessing the event myself.

    > Then go outside to
    > Ahuma,Annexcafe,AOL to name a few.


    Why the **** should I go anywhere? You come out with baseless bull****
    about someone else, it's up to you to provide proof- it's not up to the
    reader to search for proof of that which you assert. Until you do, what
    you have to say remains baseless.

    > I am sure your jaw will drop.
    >


    Proof- put up or shut the **** up, you ****wit.

    > Yes Then STFU with your mixed up head Aardvark.


    Nothing mixed up about *my* head.

    > But hey,I still like you
    > and your style


    Like I give a **** about anything you have to say?



    --
    "En un lugar de la Mancha, de cuyo nombre no quiero acordarme,
    no hace mucho tiempo que vivĂ*a un hidalgo de los de lanza en
    astillero, adarga antigua, rocĂ*n flaco y galgo corredor."
    -Cervantes, 'Don Quixote'

  7. #17
    StevieO Guest

    Re: Would YOU sign these terms?!!!

    LMAO!! You keep responding to him
    like easter to bd...Two ****WITS!


    "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
    news:ic8in0$1ui$4@news.eternal-september.org...

    Like I give a **** about anything you have to say?





  8. #18
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: Would YOU sign these terms?!!!


    "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
    news:ic8i22$1ui$3@news.eternal-september.org...
    > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:08:43 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:
    >
    >>> Can you prove that assertion? Like, provide a link or MID or whatever?



    Aardvark

    Well that is what you get from a saved post from 2007 on the
    microsoft.public.security

    --
    Peter
    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    http://www.microsoft.com/protect



  9. #19
    Dustin Guest

    Re: The start! February 2006

    ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
    news:LaSdnWZ8Cpb4GnrRnZ2dnUVZ8qadnZ2d@bt.com:


    > Here's where things started really.


    You have some posts which need answering in your troll group.

    > http://groups.google.com/group/micro...y/browse_threa
    > d/thread/a2c46d36b9403825/c575164e625e45ac?hl=en&q=Perplexed+-+who+sh
    > ould+I+believe%3F#


    Another demonstration of your googling masterskillset; wonderful.

    Btw, I've detrolled your work; crossposts to the following groups:
    ,microsoft.public.security,alt.politics.scorched-earth has been removed.
    If you continue crossposting offtopic crap to them, I'll forward copies
    to your ISP.

    > So, BoaterDave, maintain that paranoia and distrust of things you
    > don't understand - and build up some trust for people who understand
    > more than you.


    Very well put. You should heed the posters. advice.


    --
    Stupidity isn't a crime. So you're free to go.

  10. #20
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Would YOU sign these terms?!!!

    Aardvark wrote:
    > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:18:04 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:
    >
    >> Aardvark
    >>
    >> And if you need further proof you can ask anyone on Annex including MS
    >> MVP's to this fact.

    >
    > Still no MID, eh, ****wit? No cite.
    >
    > You make all these assertions and accusations with nothing but your sock-
    > puppets to back up what you have to say.
    >
    > You're a ****ing joke.
    >
    >> Mr. Dave did a PcButts
    >> a couple of times.

    >
    > What? Stole someone else's code and used it as his own? Don't make me
    > laugh.
    >
    >> He is a 2 faced person trying to act the good boy.

    >
    > I've never found him to be anything other than straightforward, if a
    > little misguided and slow to understand some things. You, on the other
    > hand...
    >
    >> You have no idea what this person did in the newsgroups from 2005-2008
    >> and now hiding under skirts..
    >>

    >
    > Well then, why not provide some meat to the bones you're throwing about-
    > y'know, like MIDs and other citation material. Until you do, then shut
    > the **** up.
    >
    >> Do not want to take my word for this.

    >
    > If you promised me that the sun would rise in the East tomorrow morning
    > I'd stay up all night just to make sure by witnessing the event myself.
    >
    >> Then go outside to
    >> Ahuma,Annexcafe,AOL to name a few.

    >
    > Why the **** should I go anywhere? You come out with baseless bull****
    > about someone else, it's up to you to provide proof- it's not up to the
    > reader to search for proof of that which you assert. Until you do, what
    > you have to say remains baseless.
    >
    >> I am sure your jaw will drop.
    >>

    >
    > Proof- put up or shut the **** up, you ****wit.
    >
    >> Yes Then STFU with your mixed up head Aardvark.

    >
    > Nothing mixed up about *my* head.
    >
    >> But hey,I still like you
    >> and your style

    >
    > Like I give a **** about anything you have to say?
    >
    >
    >


    You've just qualified for another beer or three aboard my boat!

    I might even treat you to a few drams of malt, too, Aardvark!

    Cheers ol' pal!

    D.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •