Aardvark wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:47:11 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> SNIP
>
> Got a point?
>
>
>
Linux is good for you! ;-)
Aardvark wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:47:11 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> SNIP
>
> Got a point?
>
>
>
Linux is good for you! ;-)
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:SOKdnc4y24nyUkTRnZ2dnUVZ8jednZ2d@bt.com...
> Introduction
[...]
Synopsis - apples are like oranges except for where there are
differences between them and apples may be preferred if you are baking a
pie or selling the ingredients needed for an apple pie recipe they tell
you that you *must* have as if you have no choice.
> Ref: http://www.webroot.com/shared/pdf/Sp...VS-Viruses.pdf
Haven't read it yet, but I suspect a similar scenario.
Could they explain how cryptovirology is not financially motivated, or
how stand-alone application malware can be harder to detect than a
polymorphic file infector is? Perhaps I'll find out by reading that
nifty PDF file.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)