IE 6,7,8

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:B92dnZwoZawENETRnZ2dnUVZ8imdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Mike Easter wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>
>>>> In such interactions, I do not believe what PF is telling BD and
>>>> I do not believe how BD interprets PF.
>>>>
>>>> So, (even) if PF said that to BD in some other thread at some
>>>> other time it would not be commentary worth evaluating.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Peter Foldes said (recently) .......
>>
>> Anything that starts with PF said to BD or BD said to PF is not
>> worth reading.
>>
>>
>
> You *did* read it though, Mike!
>

Are you keeping track of the amount of helpful persons you alienate and
turn away? It's painfully obvious you'll never get a clue.


--
Stupidity isn't a crime. So you're free to go.

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:B92dnZwoZawENETRnZ2dnUVZ8imdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In such interactions, I do not believe what PF is telling BD and
>>>>> I do not believe how BD interprets PF.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, (even) if PF said that to BD in some other thread at some
>>>>> other time it would not be commentary worth evaluating.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter Foldes said (recently) .......
>>>
>>> Anything that starts with PF said to BD or BD said to PF is not
>>> worth reading.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You *did* read it though, Mike!
>>
>
> Are you keeping track of the amount of helpful persons you alienate and
> turn away? It's painfully obvious you'll never get a clue.
>
>

Maybe it would be good if *you* were to explain why someone is using IE6
for business purposes, Dustin.

A WAG would be better than nothing at all.